Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 1 no. 3 (2023)

Pupils’ Learning Styles and Academic Performance in Modular Learning

June Albert Cavite | Maria Victoria Gonzaga

 

Abstract:

This study assesses the student learning styles and academic performance in modular learning among Grade IV, V, and VI learners of Hindang Central School. This considered the learning styles and academic performance of the respondents in modular learning. A total of 252 learners from Hindang Central School participated as respondents in the evaluative method of research that consists of two parts questionnaires. This study used a modified survey questionnaire from the University of California at Merced, Student Advising and Learning Center to gather the data of the respondents. As to the significance of learning styles and academic performances of the respondents in modular learning, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the significant differences. The study's findings indicated that auditory learning was the respondents' preferred method of learning. This learning style is best through speaking or listening. Moreover, auditory learners prevail dominantly amidst the health crisis faced. The respondents' academic achievement in the academic year 2020–2021 was also revealed to be Very Satisfactory. According to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), there was no apparent connection between learning preferences and academic achievement in the new typical education. Therefore, there was no relation or correlation between the two variables.



References:

  1. Aboe, R. M. (2019). Correlation Between Students Learning Styles and Their Learning Achievement. Research Gate, 1-10. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330410976_Correlation_Between_Students_Learning_Styles_and_Their_Learning_Achievement/citations
  2. Adipat, S. (2021). Why Web-Conferencing Matters: Rescuing Education in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from Frontiers in Education: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.752522/full
  3. Almigbal, T. H. (2015). Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi Medical Journal, 36(3), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.3.10320
  4. Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
  5. Carlton, G. (2021). Adapting Learning Styles During COVID-19. The Best Schools. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://thebestschools.org/magazine/types-of-learners/
  6. Cetin-Dindar, A. (2016). Student Motivation in Constructivist Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 233-247. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1399a
  7. Dangle, Y. R. P., & Sumaoang, J. D. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools. In 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education (Vol. 100, p. 108)
  8. Dayagbil FT, P. D. (2021). Teaching and Learning Continuity Amid and Beyond the Pandemic. (J. Royel, Ed.) Teaching and Learning Continuity Amid and Beyond the Pandemic, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692
  9. Felder, R., & Solomon, B. (2017). Learning Styles and Strategies. Retrieved July 16, 2022, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.htm
  10. García, E., & Weiss, E. (2020). COVID-19 and Student Performance, Equity, and US Education Policy: Lessons from Pre-Pandemic Research to Inform Relief, Recovery, and Rebuilding. Economic Policy Institute.
  11. Gilbert C. Magulod, J. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.504
  12. Guiamalon, T. (2021). Teachers’ issues and concerns on the use of modular learning modality. IJASOS-International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 7(20), 457-469.
  13. Ilcin, N. T. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2
  14. Kayalar, F., & Kayalar, F. (2017). The effects of Auditory Learning Strategy on Learning Skills of Language Learners (Students' Views). Research Gate, 1-22. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320880247_The_effects_of_Auditory_Learning_Strategy_on_Learning_Skills_of_Language_Learners_Students'_Views#:~:text=Auditory%20learning%20style%20enables%20auditory,all%20important%20to%20these%20learners.
  15. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7-44.
  16. Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the Potential Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Academic Achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918
  17. Alforque, L. (2023). Flipped Classroom and ManyChat Delivering Online-Offline (MCDOO) Learning for Science, Technology and Engineering Curriculum (STEC) Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(2), 96-118. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7947194. https://www.ijmeri.com/alforque-l
  18. McLeod, S. (2019). Constructivism as a theory for teaching and learning. Simply Psychology. Retrieved July 17, 2019, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
  19. Mehmet Fatih Ayaz, H. S. (2015). The Effects of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Student’s Academic. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14, 143-156. Retrieved October 2015, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077612.pdf
  20. Olivo, M. G. (2021). Parents’ perception on printed modular distance learning in Canarem Elementary School: Basis for proposed action plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(4), 296-309.
  21. Panganiban, G. L., & Madrigal, D. V. (2021). Grappling with the learning modules: Experience of public elementary pupils attending English written modular classes. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 20, 263.
  22. Ramirez, M. A. (2022). Learning Styles of Students Amidst Pandemic Vis-À-Vis Academic Performance in Science 10: A Basis for Proposed Intervention Plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(1), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.01.06
  23. Shabani, M. (2012). Different Learning Style Preference of Male and Female Iranian Non-academic EFL Learners. Canadian Center of Science and Education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p127
  24. Yasmin, F., Akbar, A., & Hussain, B. (2016). The impact of perceptual learning styles on academic performance of masters' level education students. Science International (Lahore), 2953-2958.
  25. Yazici, H. (2016). Role of Learning Style preferences and interactive response system on student learning outcomes. Int J Inf Oper Manag Educ 6, 109-34.
  26. Yufrizal, H., Sudirman, & Hasan, B. (2015). The effect of learning styles and motivation on Indonesian students’ English achievement. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i2.630

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic