Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 8 no. 10 (2023)

The Use of Individualized Materials in Relation to Learners’ Reading Comprehension

Mary Jeane Capangpangan | Teresita Sambo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the contribution of individualized reading materials to the reading comprehension of Grade VI learners at Francisco Ll. Laya Memorial Integrated School, Pindugangan, Tipanoy, Iligan City during the school year 2019-2020. Specifically, the study determined how this strategy helped in terms of the pretest-posttest reading performances using the PHIL-IRI selections in Comparative and Individualized Group; the significant difference between the pretest and posttest reading performances of the participants in the Comparative and Individualized group; and finally the reading materials to be compiled based on the results of the study. Quasi-experimental research design was utilized and a standard Phil-IRI questionnaire was used in gathering data. Frequency and percentage, independent t-test and paired t-test were performed to find out the significant relationship between the pretest and posttest reading performances of the respondents in the two groups. The study revealed that using individualized reading materials contributed in improving the reading comprehension skills of the learners. Significant conclusions were given that the use of the individualized reading materials created a new learning atmosphere which motivated the pupils to improve their comprehension of the read text.



References:

  1. Aberilla, E. (2015). The use of contextualized module in teaching Biology: Basis for teachers’ training. Master’s thesis, Capitol University, Cagayan de Oro City.
  2. Adler, C. (2013). Seven strategies to teach student’s reading comprehension. Retrieved August 10,2019 from Rocketorg reading. https://www.readingrockets.org
  3. Aguilera, A (2014). Strategy intervention to enhance reading comprehension of 15-year-old students in Mexico. Retrieved July 5 , 2 0 1 9 f r o m https://file///c:/users/user/Desktop/phd_thesisethesis_correct_correct_pag es.pdf
  4. Altman DG. (2011). Comparability of randomized groups. The Statistician 34: 125–136. 10.2307/2987510. Applegate, M. &
  5. Applegate, A., (2013). Overcoming obstacle to deep comprehesion of text: A continuum of narrative comprehension.Retrieved July 18, 2019 from https://books.google.com.ph/
  6. Ausubel, (2008). Cognitive learning theory: Meaningful learning theory, subsumption theory and motivational theory. Retrieved on August 2, 2019 from http://cimtprelims.wikia.com/wiki/
  7. Baier, S. (2005) Metacognitive process and reading comprehension. Retrieved August 10, 2019 at https://www.journalwriting/publication/educ.pdf.4132
  8. Bastug,M.(2014).The structural relationship of reading attitude ,reading comprehension and academic achievement. International J.Soc.Scie. & Education
  9. Berkely, S. (2011). Reading comprehension strategy instruction and attribution retraining for secondary students with disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts: Humanities and Social Sciences 68 (3-A) : 949. Retrieved from ldx.sagepub.com/content/44
  10. Best, J.W. ( 2011). Research in education: USA: Prentice Hall
  11. Brown, H. D. (2011). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
  12. Branzuela, A.N. (2008). An assessment of reading ability of the elementary pupils at St.Peters College. M.A.thesis .St.Peters College Iligan City.
  13. Brantmeier, C. (2006). Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: Sources of interest, perceived situational interest, and comprehension. Reading in Foreign Language.
  14. Busick, T. (2013). Effect of reading intervention strategies for elementary students at-risk of reading disabilities. Retrieved on A u g u s t 2 0 1 9 f r o m https://www.nmu.edu/education/sites/DrupalEducation/files/userfile s/Busic k-Traci-MR.pdf.
  15. Cada, E.& Tenio J. (2013). English for you and me language 6, bookwise, Joyce Publishing House.
  16. Carlisle JF, et al. (2011). First-grade teachers’ response to three models of professional development in reading. Reading and Writing Journal.
  17. Cayubit, R.F. (2012). Vocabulary and reading comprehension as a measure of reading skills of Filipino children. Retrieved July 12, 219 from http://www.Academia.Edu/2469690/vocabulary-and-readingcomprehension-as-a-measure-of-reading-skills-of-Filipino-children
  18. Ciampa, C.I. (2012). Students takes flight with Daedalus: Learning Spanish in a networked classroom. Foreign Language Annals,30 (1),27.37. Retrieved August 16,2019 at www.googlesearch.com
  19. Connor CM, Phillips B, et al. (2014). Comprehension tools for teachers: Reading for understanding from prekindergarten through fourth grade. Educational Psychology Review.
  20. Connor CM. (2015). Individualizing teaching in beginning reading. Better: Evidence-based Education, Autumn. 2014:4–7.
  21. Cronbach LJ. & Snow RE. (2007). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington; Ebisa, E. (2006). Reading predictors and their relationship to the reading ability of grade four pupils at Dona Juana Actub Lluch Memorial Central School: Basis for an intervention program (accessed June 19, 2019)
  22. Dole, J. (2007). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journal. University of Chicago Press.
  23. Grade 6 reading comprehension worksheets. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from https://www.eastteacherworksheets.com/langarts/readingcomp.grade6.html
  24. Gunning, T. (1996). Theory of reading comprehension. Retrieved on August 2, 2019 from www.domain.edu
  25. Harris. A. (2010). How to increase reading ability, New York, Longsmans: Green and Company.
  26. Hausheer,R., Hanseen A. & Doumas, D.M, (2010 ).Improving reading fluency and comprehension among elementary students’ evaluation of a school remedial reading program. Baise State University. Retrieved August 8, 2019 from http://,SC.Montanaedu/article/v9n9.pdf.
  27. Hilson, H. (2008). Individualized reading in first grade. “Educational Leadership vol. 16.
  28. Hersch, J. & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading.
  29. Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching reading and writing: A guidebook for tutoring and remediating students. Estofer Road, Playmouth: Rowman & Littlefield Education
  30. Logsdon, A. (2019) Reading comprehension problems, causes, symptoms and support. Retrieved on July 1, 2019 from eprints.uny.ac.id/
  31. Macaruso, P., Hook .P. E. & McCabe,R, (2006).The efficacy of computer-based supplement phonics programs for advancing reading skills elementary students. Retrieved September 2, 2019 from http://www.lexiauk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/efficacystudy.pdf
  32. Mcgeown, C., Norgate, A. & Warhurst, J. (2012). Electronic texts in ESOL classroom, TESOL Quarterly,34/3, 585-589. Retrieved June 20, 2019 at www.googlescholar.com
  33. Miff, H. (2009) Fluency in education place. Retrieved on August 10, 2019 from https://www.eduplace.com.
  34. Oguz, E. (2009). Assessing reading habits of future classroom teachers in the context of their socio-demographic features. International Journal of Behavioral Cognitive, Educational, and Psychological Sciences.
  35. Pangcatan, (2006). The effectiveness of dimensional appproach in teaching reading among grade VI pupils. MSU. MARAWI: Marawi City.
  36. Paris,E. & Paris M. (2007). Introduction to research in education,7th Ed. Belmont , CA: Retrieved July 2,.2019 from Thomson & I Wadsworth Research /oc/c/318408193.
  37. Piaget,J.(1968) Cognitive development. Retrieved on August 2, 2019 from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/piaget.htm
  38. Rand Reading Study Group(2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement
  39. Rivera,C.,Nicor,R.& Bacugar, M.(2005). Workbook in English 6,5775 reverse the education crisis
  40. Sun, L. (2013). The effect of meta-cognitive learning strategies on english learning. Retrieved October 24, 2017 from https://search.proquest.com/docview/
  41. Sundling, N. (2012). Effective mathematics intervention programs for students in Grades Three through Five. Retrieved April 26, 2 0 1 7 f r o m https://www.nmu.education/sites/DrupalEducation/files/UserFiles Sunding_Nicky_MP.pdf.
  42. Therrien, W., Wickstron K., & Jones K. (2006).Effect of a combined repeated reading and questions generation intervention reading achievement at http://www.googlesscholary.com.ph/
  43. Tizon, M. (2013). Reading comprehension ability of grade VI pupils of Kinangay Sur Elementary. Retrieved on July 12, 2019 from http://worldconference.net/proceedings/gse2013/
  44. Tuckman, B. W. (2010). Educational psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  45. Wells, J. (2015). Fluency sequel. Retrieved on August25, 2019 from www.amazon.com>...>kindle eBooks>Science Fiction& Fantasy
  46. Winkiel, (2003). Effects of conceptual fluency on memory and linking. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from Department of Psychosocial Science University of Bergen, Norway http://www.He/sinki.fi?
  47. Youvanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo J. & Tindal G.(2005). Gradelevel invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24 (3), 4-12.
  48. Ye, Y.(2005). Importance of reading skills. Retrieved July 2, 2019 from https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.w/bitstream./

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic