HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 14 no. 1 (2023)

Perceptions on the Utilization of Grammarly Application to Enhance Students’ Research Writing Skills

Alnoury Cauring | Norjanna Sama | Sheminith Love Boreros | Allea Panansaran

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

To overcome problems in students’ writing, some students use computer-based writing methods like Grammarly which helps to check for errors in students’ writing. This study examined the students’ perceptions of utilizing the Grammarly application to enhance their research writing skills. The study employed a descriptive-survey research design, utilizing a modified survey questionnaire from Cavaleri and Dianati (2016) to gather data from the Grade 9 to 12 student-researchers of ARMM Regional Science High School. Results showed that most students perceived positively the need for digital support, especially in proofreading from the Grammarly application yet they have enough background in research writing (mean = 3.1). Also, they gave positive responses towards Grammarly how helpful was Grammarly (mean = 3.7), no drawbacks (mean = 3.7), and extremely useful and easy it to use. Therefore, it concluded that the use of the Grammarly application has positive and helpful feedback, is easy to use, and was extremely useful that it can improve students’ writing skills.



References:

  1. Bello, Z. Y. 2008. Global Journal of Finance and Banking Issues, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008. Retrieved on May 22, 2023 from  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id_1536156.
  2. Bryne, D. 1988. Teaching Writing Skills. Singapore. Longman. Retrieved on April 03, 2023 from https://repository.upi.edu/28514/9/T_ING_1402124.
  3. Cavaleri, M., and S. Dianati. 2016. You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), 223. Retrieved on April 05, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366851890.
  4. Elbow, P.  1989. Toward a phenomenology of freewriting. Journal of Basic Writing, 8(2), 42-71. Retrieved on April 01, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net./publication/325529807.
  5. Fowler, D. 2007. Facilitating Program, Faculty, and Student Transformation: A Framework for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved on April 05, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282851376.
  6. Ghufron, M. A. 2019. Exploring an automed feedback program ‘grammarly’ and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment. In proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference. Retrieved on April 05, 2023 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1288928.pdf.
  7. Mcnamara, D. S. 2010. The Development of Polysemy and Frequency Use in English Second Language Speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573-605. Retrieved on April 05, 2023 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x.
  8. Macmilan, D. S. 1995. Atmospheric gradients from very long baseline interferometry observation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1041-1044, 1995. Retrieved on April 05, 2023 from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/97GL00143&hl.
  9. Pratiwi, K. D. 2015. Students’ difficulties in Writing. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 46-54. Retrieved on April 01, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication /366851890.
  10. Vanderpyl, G. 2012. The Process Approach as Writing Instruction in EFL Classrooms. MA TESOL Collection, 545. Retrieved on April 01, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net./publication/325529807.
  11. Wibowo, H., and S. Raihani. 2019. “An Indonesian model of successful School in Leadership”. J.Educ.Adm., Vol.46, no.4, pp. 481-496. Retrieved on January 05, 2023 from https://eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1299511.pdf.
  12. Widiati, B.Y., and U. Cahyono. 2011.  Teaching of EFL Listening in the Indonesian Context: State of Art. TEFLINJ 20:194-211. Retrieved on January 05, 2023 from https://unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/7391.