Home⇛Universal Journal of Educational Research⇛vol. 2 no. 4 (2023)

Exploring The Insights into Grade 11 Learners’ Understanding of the “Roots” of Quadratic Equations

Tšhegofatšo Phut Makgakga

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This article provides insights into Grade 11 learner understanding of the roots of quadratic equations, how learners used solution strategies to find equations with given roots, how they determine the unknown values and the other root when one root is given and how they determine the unknown values when two roots of the equation are given. The study was underpinned by Skemp’s relational and instrumental understanding, and Kilpatrick, Swafford and Findel’s conceptual and procedural understanding to gain the insights into Grade 11 learners’ understanding of the roots of quadratic equations. A case study design was espoused to answer the main research questions of this study. A written test was administered to 42 learners, and eight learners were purposively sampled to participate in a clinical interview based on their responses to the test. The findings of this study revealed that learners find it difficult to describe the roots, determine the other root when one root is given, to solve quadratic equations written in standard form, to represent the roots to determine the value of unknown variable(s), and to execute the reversal process using the given roots to find the equation.



References:

  1. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. eds. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  2. Cahyani, L., & Rahaju, E. B. (2019). Students’ reflective abstraction of middle school in reconstructing quadratic equation concept based on high mathematical ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012044
  3. Carpenter, T.P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. (In Fennema, E. & Romberg, T. eds. Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 19–32).
  4. Clark, M. K. (2012). History of mathematics: Illuminat¬ing understanding of school mathematics concepts for prospective mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 67–84.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design : qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.: New Delhi.
  6. Didis, M. G., & Erbas, A. K. (2015). Performance and Difficulties of Students in Formulating and Solving Quadratic Equations with One Unknown. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(4), 1137–1150.
  7. Gözde, M., & Kabar, D. (2018). Secondary School Students’ Conception of Quadratic Equations with One Unknown. In International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning (Vol. 1).
  8. Herawaty, D., Widada, W., Gede, W., Lusiana, D., Pusvita, Y., Widiarti, Y., & Anggoro, A. F. D. (2021). The cognitive process of students understanding quadratic             equations. Journal of Physisc: Conference Series 1731 012053, 1 – 11
  9. Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3–19.
  10. Hu, Q., Son, J. W., & Hodge, L. (2021). Algebra teachers’ interpretation and responses to student errors in solving quadratic equations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 637-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10166-1
  11. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational Research, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approach. (4th ed). California: SAGE Publication
  12. Kabar, M. G. D. (2018). Secondary school students’ conception of quadratic equations with one unknown. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 112-129.
  13. Katz, V., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9023-7
  14. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  15. Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2022). HOTS in Quadratic Equations: Teaching Style Preferences and Challenges Faced by Malaysian Teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 15-33.
  16. Kotsopoulos, D. (2007). Unraveling student challenges with quadratics: A cognitive approach. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(2), 19–24.
  17. Lima, R. N. (2008). Procedural embodiment and quadratic equations. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/701.
  18. Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2010). An example of the fragility of a procedural approach to solving quadratic equations (Draft). Available from: http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/downloads.html.
  19. Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276
  20. López, J., Robles, I., & Martίnez-Planell, R. (2016). Students’ understanding of quadratic equations. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 552–572.
  21. Machaba, F. M. (2016). The concepts of area and perimeter: insights and misconceptions of Grade 10 learners. Pythagoras, 37(1), 1–11.
  22. Mestre, J. (1987). Why should mathematics and science teachers be interested in cognitive research findings? Academic Connections, 3-11.
  23. Moosavi, H., Tehranian, A., Doostie, H., & Shahvarani, A. (2022). A New Tool for Assessing the Understanding of Calculus by Relying on Relational and Instrumental Understanding, Educatio Siglo XXI, 40(1), 55–78.
  24. Murphy, P., & Alexander, P. (2004). Persuasion as a dynamic, multidimensional process: An investigation of individual and intraindividual differences. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 337-363.
  25. Ojose, B. (2015). Students’ misconceptions in mathematics: analysis of remedies and what research says. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 72, 30-35.
  26. Pegg, J. 2010. Promoting the acquisition of higher order skills and understandings in primary and secondary mathematics. Make it count: what research tells us about effective mathematics teaching and learning. Camberwell: ACER (pp. 35–39).
  27. Pike, M., Barnes, H., Jawurek, A., Kitto, A., Laridon, P., Myburgh, M., Rhodes-Houghton, R., Scheiber, J., Sigabi, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Classroom mathematics learner’s book grade 10. Heinemann Publishers (Pty) Lts.
  28. Prima Sari, I. F. D., & Jailani, J. (2019). Error analysis for grade IX students in completing the materials of quadratic equation. Annals of Mathematical Modelling, 1(2), 64-          80.
  29. Reotutar, M. A., Riboroso, R. A., Llagas, R. M., & Taban, J. G. (2023). Employment of the Master of Arts in Mathematics Education Graduates of a University in Northern Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 226-240.
  30. Sağlam, R., & Alacacı, C. (2012). A comparative analysis of quadratics unit in Singaporean, Turkish and IMDP mathe¬matics textbooks. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 131–147.
  31. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
  32. Slamet, P., Irawati, C. S. D. S., & Prayekti, N. (2020). Critical thinking ability of high school students in solving a quadratic equation problem. Journal of Critical Review, 7(6), 2061-2069.
  33. Sosa-Moguel, L., & Aparicio-Landa, E. (2021). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ perceptions about inductive reasoning and their interpretation in teaching. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 239-256. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.12863.239-256
  34. Tall, D., de Lima, R. N., & Healy, L. (2014). Evolving a three-world framework for solving algebraic equations in the light of what a student has met before. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 1–13.
  35. Tendere, J., & Mutambara, L. H. N. (2020). An analysis of errors and misconceptions in the study of quadratic equations. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 1(2), 81-90.
  36. Thomas, D. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Analysis of students’ error in solving quadratic equations using Newman’s procedure. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11760
  37. Vaiyavutjamai, P., Ellerton, N. F., & Clements, M. A. (2005). Students’ attempts to solve two elementary quadratic equations: A study in three nations. Retrieved from www.merga.net.au/documents/RP852005.pdf
  38. Vaiyavutjamai, P., & Clements, M. A. (2006). Effects of classroom instruction on students’ understanding of quadratic equations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 47–77.
  39. Van de Walle, J. (Ed.) (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  40. Van de Walle, J. (Ed.) (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  41. Wilkie, K. J. (2021). Seeing quadratics in a new light: Secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ creation of figural growing patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09997-6
  42. Yasin, A. (2017). A review of research on the misconceptions in mathematics education. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology 2017, 21-31
  43. Yeow P. C., Thavamani, R., Kamalah, R., Wong J. W., & Santhanasamy V. D. (2019). Buku Teks Matematik Tingkatan Empat. Penerbit Pustaka Yakin

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic