HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 1 (2024)

Learning with Mobile Phone: Evaluating Grammar Learning in Learning Objects

Charlene Joy Oliveros

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the customized mobile application comprised of learning objects (LOs). The mobile app evaluated was personally developed by the researcher to serve as supplemental material for learning grammar (i.e., the active and passive voice) with the aim of improving the learners’ grammar competence. The study employed the descriptive-evaluative research design focusing on the perspectives of the students on the mobile application through the “Learning Object Evaluation Scale for Students (LOES-S)” in terms of three constructs: (1) learning, (2) quality, and (3) engagement. Significant findings of the study included how beneficial and valuable the mobile application was to the learners in terms of “learning” with WM = 4.55, (2) “quality” with WM = 4.56, and (3) “engagement” with WM = 4.68. The study developed mobile application for learning grammar (i.e., the active and passive voice) was proven effective based on the evaluation of the students. Hence, recommended for wide dissemination.



References:

  1. Amane, M., Aissaoui, K., & Berrada, M. (2023). New perspective of learning objects in e-learning system. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(3), 269-279.
  2. Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students' Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533.
  3. Demir, K., & Akpinar, E. (2018). The Effect of Mobile Learning Applications on Students' Academic Achievement and Attitudes toward Mobile Learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 48-59.
  4. Dumitrica, D., & Jarmula, P. (2022). Teaching Qualitative Research Methods in Media and Communication: The Benefits and Limitations of Digital Learning Objects. The Qualitative Report, 27(9), 1934-1951.
  5. Gryzun, L. E., & Tokariev, V. V. (2023). Mobile applications design for digital education: IT-students’ engagement experience on conditions of online learning the course “Mobile technologies”. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (pp. 110-123).
  6. Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Belanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191-216.
  7. Kumar, K. (2023, August 16). Mobile Learning: Empowering education in the Digital age. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/mobile-learning-empowering-education-in-the-digital-age
  8. Mallidis-Malessas, P., Iatraki, G., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2022). Teaching physics to students with intellectual disabilities using digital learning objects. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(4), 510-522.
  9. Méndez, A. G. (2017). Contribution to the authoring, distribution, evaluation and integration of learning objects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spanish.
  10. Onofrei, G., & Ferry, P. (2020). Reusable learning objects: a blended learning tool in teaching computer-aided design to engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(10), 1559-1575.
  11. Pechenkina, E., Laurence, D., Oates, G., Eldridge, D., & Hunter, D. (2017). Using a gamified mobile app to increase student engagement, retention and academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-12.
  12. Santos, F. R. P., Concilio, I. D. A. S., & Pessoa Filho, J. (2018, October). Development of Learning Objects for Teaching Mathematics using SCORM. In 2018 XIII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO) (pp. 264-269). IEEE.
  13. Wong, W. (2022). Student-Created Learning Objects for Mathematics Renewable Assignments: The Potential Value They Bring to the Broader Community (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University).