Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 1 no. 4 (2023)

Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Self-Efficacy in Blended Learning

Jessa A. Garzon | Julius R. Garzon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examines the relationship between technological profile, digital literacy, and self-efficacy among teachers in blended learning. The study utilized the descriptive correlational design. The participants involved 35 teachers selected via purposive sampling from urban schools in Maasin City implementing printed and online teaching modalities. Standardized tools assessed teachers’ digital technology profile, literacy, and self-efficacy. Significant findings revealed that teachers have easy access to digital technology, are somewhat familiar with technological concepts, often utilize ICT-based technologies, and perceive usage purposes as necessary. Teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy are at the average level. Correlation analysis established a significant and strong relationship between the technological profile of teachers and their digital literacy. Digital literacy also significantly and strongly correlated with self-efficacy. This study concluded that the technological profile of teachers influences their digital literacy level. Teachers with high digital literacy skills increase their self-efficacy in technology integration. The blended learning approach constitutes teachers’ digital literacy and self-efficacy as critical players of effectiveness.



References:

  1. Abouelnaga, H. M., Metwally, A. B. AlDhmour, M., Shoshan, H., Saleh, M., Mazouz, L. A., Abouelmagd, H., Alsmadi, S., Aljamaeen, R., Eljawad, L., & Hamad, L. (2019). A survey on educational technology in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(22), 4146-4160.
  2. Alchamdani, Fatmasari, Anugrah, E. R., Sari, N. P., Putri, F., & Astina. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the online learning process in the College at Southeast Sulawesi. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 12(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v12i1si.
  3. Area-Moreira, M., Bonilla, P. J. S., & Mesa, A. L. S. (2020). La transformación digital de los centros escolares. Obstáculos y resistencias. Digit. Educ. Rev., 37, 15–31.
  4. Aslan, S. (2021). Analysis of digital literacy self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47
  5. Bach, A. J., Wolfson, T., & Crowell, J. K. (2018). Poverty, literacy, and social transformation: An interdisciplinary exploration of the digital divide. Jmle, 10(1), 22–41. doi:10.23860/jmle-2018-10-1-2
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, pp. 84, 191–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  7. Beck, E., Goin, M. E., Ho, A., Parks, A., & Rowe, S. (2021). Critical digital literacy as a method for teaching tactics of response to online surveillance and privacy erosion. Computers and Composition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102654
  8. Bedran, P. F. (2016). Digital literacy and language teacher education in contemporary times. Rev. Entrelinguas, 2, 225–247.
  9. Beurer-Zuellig, B., & Meckel, M. (2008). Smartphones enable mobile collaboration. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 49–59). Waikoloa, HI. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.399
  10. Blaskó, Z., Costa, P. D., & Schnepf, S. V. (2022). Learning losses and educational inequalities in Europe: Mapping the potential consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(4), 361–375.
  11. Blažič, B. J., & Blažič, A. J. (2020). It is overcoming the digital divide with a modern approach to learning digital skills for elderly adults. Educ. Inf. Tech., 25(1), 259–279.
  12. Darlis, V., & Sari, D. K. (2020). The effectiveness of blended learning: The impact of student’s characteristics and digital literacy on student performance. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020) (pp. 561–566). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 506(1). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200818.106
  13. Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpiński, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent international datasets (Vol. 30275). Publications Office of the European Union.
  14. Faraj, S., Renno, W., & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100337
  15. Francisco, E., Ferreira, H. M., & Goulart, I. D. V. (2019). Digital literacy: What is discussed about the use of digital technologies in the formation of Portuguese-speaking teachers? Texto Livre-Líng. E Tecnologia, 12, 109–127.
  16. Greene, J. A., Yu, S., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.011
  17. Gummess, G. (2019). Faculty initiative and the role of self-efficacy in raising digital literacy: A study. ProQuest LLC, East Eisenhower Parkway.
  18. Hadiyanti, N. F. D., Hobri, Prihandoko, A. C., Susanto, Murtikusuma, R. P., Khasanah, N., & Maharani, P. (2021). Development of mathematics e-module with STEM-collaborative project-based learning to improve mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012031
  19. Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and school ICT use. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1144580
  20. Hatlevik, I. K., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation, and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(935). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
  21. Herrera-Aguilar, M., Medina-Aguilar, G. A., & Martínez-Musiño, C. (2015). La alfabetización informacional y la alfabetización digital en estudiantes de Comunicación: El caso de la Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. In Claves para la comprensión de la cultura digital (pp. 11–41). Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.
  22. Jenson, J., Tomin, B., & Terzopoulos, T. (2018). Making Space for Innovation: Teacher Perspectives on a Wearable Technology Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI, 2018), Seville, Spain, 12–14 November 2018; p. 4360.
  23. Karunaratne, T., Zhemchugova, H., Byungura, J.C., & Olsson, U. (2019). Towards an agile-based process model for practical teacher training on LMS. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on E-learning (ECEL), Copenhagen, Denmark, 7–8 November 2019; pp. 284–293.
  24. Kent, A.M., & Giles, R.M. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy. SRATE Journal, 26(1), 9-20.
  25. Lai, J., & Widmar, N.O. (2021). Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID-19 Era. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 458–464. doi:10.1002/aepp.13104
  26. Liang, Y., Abbott, D., Howard, N., Lim, K., Ward, R., & Elgendi, M. (2019). How Effective Is Pulse Arrival Time for Evaluating Blood Pressure? Challenges and Recommendations from a Study Using the MIMIC Database. Journal of clinical medicine, 8(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030337
  27. Lordache, C., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing Digital Skills and Competences: A Quick-Scan Analysis of 13 Digital Literacy Models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1). doi:10.14658/pupj-ijse-2017-1-2
  28. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
  29. Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ digital literacy self-efficacy scale development. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(5), 1427-1436.
  30. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50, 1084–1091.
  31. Perifanou, M., Tzafilkou, K., & Economides, A.A. (2021). The Role of Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube Frequency of Use in University Students’ Digital Skills Components. Education Sciences, 11(766). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120766
  32. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, pp. 2, 923–945.
  33. Seers, K., & Crichton, N. (2001). Quantitative research: Designs relevant to nursing and healthcare. NT Research, 6(1), 487-500.
  34. Senemoğlu, N. (2018). Development, learning, and teaching: From theory to practice. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  35. Supriyadi, T., Julia, J., Aeni, A. N., & Sumarna, E. (2020). Action research in hadith literacy reflects hadith learning in the digital age. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.6
  36. Nugraha, A. A. P. P. Y., & Widiana, I. W. (2021). Learning Alternative Energy Using Graphic Video Media. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 224–230. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i2.35154
  37. Tulinayo, F. P. (2018). Digital technologies in resource-constrained higher learning institutions: A study on students’ acceptance and usability. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(36), 1-19.
  38. Vartanova, E., & Gladkova, A. (2019). New Forms of the Digital Divide. Digital media inequalities: Policies against divides, distrust, and discrimination, 193–213.
  39. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250.
  40. Walker, W. (2005). The strengths and weaknesses of research designs involving quantitative measures. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10(5), 571–82.
  41. Yu, T.-K., Lin, M.-L., & Liao, Y.-K. (2017). Understanding Factors Influencing Information Communication Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderators of Information Literacy and Digital Skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.005

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic