Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 3 (2024)

Effects of the Implementation of an Interactive Students’ Notebook (ISN) on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Atomic Structure and Motivation Towards Science

Jay Meng S Jusgado

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the impact of an interactive student's notebook on Grade 8 Junior high school chemistry students' conceptual understanding of atomic structure and motivation toward science. Using a mixed-method sequential explanatory approach, a quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups design was employed, with pretest and posttest assessments, interviews, and questionnaires. The experimental group (using interactive notebooks) showed significantly higher conceptual understanding gains compared to the control group. The interactive notebook intervention also positively affected students' motivation, particularly intrinsic and career motivation. The study provides compelling evidence that incorporating Interactive Student Notebooks positively influences students' conceptual understanding of atomic structure and their motivation toward science. The use of ISNs facilitates higher levels of conceptual understanding, as reflected in the increased percentage of students achieving Level 4 proficiency in interpreting atomic theory and accurately representing atomic models. Moreover, ISNs contribute to higher levels of motivation, particularly in terms of career motivation and intrinsic motivation.



References:

  1. Davis, B. J. (2018). Conceptual change in learning: The role of reflection. Routledge.
  2. Drigas, A., & Zografos, V. (2018). Motivating collaborative learning through the use of self-assessment and peer assessment. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(1), 10-17.
  3. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
  4. Engelshaft, P., & Kruger, D. (2021). Modeling as Scientific Reasoning: The Role of Abductive Reasoning for Modeling Competence.
  5. Gilbert, J. K. (2010). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1091.
  6. Glynn, S. M. (2011). University of Georgia, USA. Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II).
  7. Hmelo-Silver, B. K., Duncan, C. E., & Chinn, J. (2018). Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 199-221.
  8. Jones. (2019). The Implications of Blended Learning in Today’s Classroom: A Look into the History, Views, Impacts, and Research.
  9. Kiewra, K. A., Duft, D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). The effects of note-taking on learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 269-287.
  10. Krell, M., Vorholzer, A., & Nehring, A. (2022). Scientific Reasoning in Science Education: From Global Measures to Fine-Grained Descriptions of Students’ Competencies.
  11. Kühn, S., & Gallinat, J. (2016). Individual differences in memory training success and neural plasticity. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 1(3), 217-225.
  12. Lee, Y., & Hong, H. (2016). The impact of a constructivist learning environment on student achievement and engagement in a blended learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 199-219.
  13. Mallozzi, F.N. (n.d.). The effects of using interactive student notebooks and specific written feedback on seventh grade students? Science process skills.
  14. Mollet, A. A. (2017). Science Interactive Notebooks: A Case Study on Learning In High School Students.
  15. Sayed, J. I., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: An evidence-based approach. Science Education, 100(3), 420-448.
  16. Smith, L., et al. (2020). Conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children (pp. 139-152). Routledge.
  17. Stevens, V. (2019). CALL-IS academic session on SMALL: Research, practice, impact of social media-assisted language learning-webcasting.
  18. Twar, B. J. (2011). The Effects of Using an Interactive Student Notebook on The Understanding Of The Concepts And Algorithms Of Addition And Subtraction Of Fractions And Mixed Numbers For Fifth Grade Mathematics Students.
  19. Z Fitriza and F Gazali. (2018). Diagnosing Students' conception on atomic structure using open ended question

Tools

All Comments (1)

Jocelyn A.Gueta
4 months ago

can i request a copy of the result of your paper. thanking you in advance


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic