Home⇛JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journal⇛vol. 53 no. 3 (2023)

Flexible Learning in Higher Education Institution: Experiences of Instructors in a Private Higher Institution

Jane Paderog

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research investigates instructors’ experiences at Agusan del Sur College concerning Flexible Learning in the New Normal. The study adopts a mixed-method approach integrating quantitative and qualitative components. Participants are 30 fulltime instructors across nine departments. The findings reveal that instructors need more training and technical competencies to conduct online courses, affecting the effectiveness of hybrid classes. Technical problems, including slow internet connections and unannounced power interruptions, despite these challenges, instructors value the flexibility inherent in Flexible Learning, spanning modalities, assessment methods, and instructional delivery, promoting greater student responsibility and time management, ultimately enhancing engagement and attentiveness. Moreover, smartphones and mobile applications serve as prevalent educational tools and eLearning resources, and there remains a preference for face-to-face classes over online learning. The study also underscores the positive impact of Flexible Learning, encompassing synchronous and asynchronous platforms, in enhancing digital and technological competencies, with 45.4% of students and 48.8% of instructors reporting its benefits. Additionally, instructors with 0-5 years of teaching experience exhibit excellent proficiency in Flexible Learning modalities and assessment methods. In conclusion, this research suggests that Flexible Learning could constitute a sustainable mode of delivery in higher education institutions, contingent on instructors receiving adequate training and support to navigate the challenges the New Normal poses effectively.



References:

  1. Alfatihah, I., Nugroho, A. S., Haessel, E., & Maharani, A. (2021). The influence of work-life balance with work motivation as mediating factor on job satisfaction A prediction toward transition to new normal situation. The Management Journal of Binaniaga.
  2. Ali, I. (2020). The covid-19 pandemic: Making sense of rumor and fear: Op-ed. Medical anthropology, 39(5), 376-379.
  3. Al-Jarf, R. (2021). EFl speaking practice in distance learning during the coronavirus pandemic 2020-2021. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(7), 179-196.
  4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in US Higher Education, 2014. Babson Survey Research Group.
  5. Arpaci, I., Karatas, K., Kusci, I., & Al-Emran, M. (2022). Understanding the social sustainability of the Metaverse by integrating UTAUT2 and big five personality traits: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Technology in Society, 71, 102120.
  6. Aydın, Ö. (2023). Teacher Education Curricula Change: Faculty Members’ perceptions And Factors Influencing Their Perceptions.
  7. Cabrejas, M. M., & Mendoza, R. O. (2023). College Students’ Engagement and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies: Its Influence to The Academic Performance in The Flexible Learning Modality. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(3), 73-84.
  8. Carillo, F. J., Maganding, M., & San Jose, A. (2023). Rewards and Drawbacks of Flexible Learning: The Case of Students in Public Higher Education Institution. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(4), 342-352.
  9. Charlier, B., & Lambert, M. (2020). Evaluating the effects of faculty development: theoretical framework and empirical implementation. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 162-175.
  10. CHED Memorandum No. 04 Series of 2020. https://bit.ly/472J3LI
  11. Chen, Y., Abel, K. T., Janecek, J. T., Chen, Y., Zheng, K., & Cramer, S. C. (2019). Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 123, 11-22.
  12. Chet, C., Sok, S., & Sou, V. (2022). The Antecedents and consequences of study commitment to online learning at higher education institutions (HEIs) in Cambodia. Sustainability, 14(6), 3184.
  13. Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and higher education: First-year students’ expectations toward distance learning. Sustainability, 13(4), 1889.
  14. Costan, F., Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Valle, L., Dela Cruz, J., Alcantara, G., ... & Ocampo, L. (2022). Teachers’ Turnover Intentions in View of Implementing a Flexible Learning System: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability, 14(20), 13009.
  15. Danchikov, E. A., Prodanova, N. A., Kovalenko, Y. N., & Bondarenko, T. G. (2021). The potential of online learning in modern conditions and its use at different levels of education. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 578-586.
  16. Dean, B. F. (2023). The 'Disconnect' Between What Nurses Want and What Hospitals Are Offering. Becker's Hospital Review. https://bit.ly/40wblMk
  17. Declaration, I. (2015). Education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. In World Education Forum (pp. 19-22).
  18. Detyna, M., & Koch, M. (2023). An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2023(1).
  19. Ding, L., & Zeng, Y. (2015). Evaluation of Chinese higher education by TOPSIS and IEW—the case of 68 universities belonging to the Ministry of Education in China. China Economic Review, 36, 341-358.
  20. Donner, R. V., Lindner, M., Tupikina, L., & Molkenthin, N. (2019). Characterizing flows by complex network methods. A mathematical modeling approach from nonlinear dynamics to complex systems, 197-226.
  21. Gaba, A., Bhushan, B., & Rao, D. K. (2021). Factors influencing the preference of distance learners to study through online during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 194-206.
  22. Gillwald, A., & Partridge, A. (2023). Gendered Nature of Digital Inequality: evidence for policy considerations. Expert Group Meeting of the sixty-seventh session of the Commission on the Status of Women. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/BP.1_Alison%20Gillwald.pdf.
  23. Ginaya, G., Rejeki, I. N. M., & Astuti, N. N. S. (2018). The effects of blended learning to students’ speaking ability: A study of utilizing technology to strengthen the conventional instruction. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(3), 1-14.
  24. Green, J. K. (2022). Designing hybrid spaces for learning in higher education health contexts. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 93-115.
  25. Grynyuk, S., Kovtun, O., Sultanova, L., Zheludenko, M., Zasluzhena, A., & Zaytseva, I. (2022). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of Ukraine's higher education system. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 20(3), pp242-256.
  26. Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19: Key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 3-16.
  27. Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., ... & Tienken, C. H. (2018). Creativity and technology in education: An international perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 409-424.
  28. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.
  29. Hung, L. N. Q. (2021). Teachers' Perceptions of the Transition from Onsite to Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(4), 416-422.
  30. Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovijk, V. (2021). Analysis of success indicators in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 205-223.
  31. Kaing, S. (2022). Implementing conditions of hybrid teaching and learning environment in Cambodian higher education and its effects on students’ 21st century learning skills.
  32. Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. (2022). Americans’ trust in scientists, other groups declines. Pew Research Center.
  33. Kessler, K., Cao, L., O'Shea, K. J., & Wang, H. (2014). A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1785), 20140388.
  34. Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). COVID-19 response: students’ readiness for shifting classes online. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1250-1270.
  35. Kushwaha, J., Sharma, A., & Singh, P. (2023). Exploration and prioritization of enablers to organization work–family balance planning for working sole Indian mothers integrating fuzzy Delphi and AHP. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(3), 398-418.
  36. Leema, K. M., & Saleem, T. M. (2017). Infusion of techno pedagogy in elementary teacher education curriculum: Perspectives and challenges. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(1), 6-10.
  37. Martin, M., & Godonoga, A. (2020). SDG 4-Policies for Flexible Learning Pathways in Higher Education. IIEP-UNESCO Working Papers, 1-52.
  38. Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., & Fox, B. (2015). A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
  39. Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital learning in Teacher education, 33(1), 6-19.
  40. Müller, C., Mildenberger, T., & Steingruber, D. (2023). Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-25.
  41. National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/ctr
  42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide: Include, upskill, innovate. OECD.
  43. Salendab, F. A., & Akmad, S. P. (2023). A Personal Narrative Experience of Teachers Teaching Purposive Commu-nication During the New Normal Education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1590-1601.
  44. Salih, A. A., & Omar, L. I. (2022). Reflective teaching in EFL online classrooms: Teachers’ perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 261-270.
  45. Schwartz, S. (2020). Survey: Teachers and students are struggling with online learning. Educ. Week.
  46. Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hilton, S. K., Ellis, D., Crawford, K. H., Dingens, A. S., ... & Bloom, J. D. (2020). Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding. cell, 182(5), 1295-1310.
  47. Thakur, N. (2015). A study on implementation of techno-pedagogical skills, its challenges and role to release at higher level of education. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 9(2), 182-186.
  48. Uddin, M. M., Ghosh, A., & Isaac, O. (2019). Impact of the system, information, and service quality of online learning on user satisfaction among public universities students in Bangladesh. International Journal of Management and Human Science (IJMHS), 3(2), 1-10.
  49. Ulanday, M. L., Centeno, Z. J., Bayla, M. C., & Callanta, J. (2021). Flexible learning adaptabilities in the new normal: E-learning resources, digital meeting platforms, online learning systems and learning engagement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2)
  50. UNESCO, I. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. (Version 2.0 ed, 92.
  51. UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO Higher Education Global Data Report. https://bit.ly/3ucUt0H
  52. Waller, A. (2019). Telling tales: unlocking the potential of AAC technologies. International journal of language & communication disorders, 54(2), 159-169.
  53. Wang, X., Niu, K., Xiong, J., Qian, B., Yao, Z., Lou, T., & Zhang, D. (2022). Placement matters: Understanding the effects of device placement for WiFi sensing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(1), 1-25.
  54. World Bank. (2022). World Development Report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery. The World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/home
  55. Xu, Z., Ramanathan, S., Rush, A., Mirkovic, J., & Yu, M. (2022). Xatu: Boosting existing DDoS detection systems using auxiliary signals. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (pp. 1-17).
  56. Yasli, M., Dabbagh, S. R., Tasoglu, S., & Aydin, S. (2023). Additive manufacturing and three-dimensional printing in obstetrics and gynecology: A comprehensive review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1-12.
  57. Zhao, Y., & Cobb, P. (2022). Teacher technology use practices in flexible learning environments: A systematic review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(5), 659-681.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic