HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 5 (2024)

Support Mechanism of School Administrators and Work Engagement of Teachers during the New Normal

San Vielle P Marcelino

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to determine the level of support mechanisms teachers received from their school supervisors during the New Normal and its impact on their work engagement. The respondents of this study are 90 teachers in Bacong District, Negros Oriental. The method used in the study is descriptivecorrelational and employed a validated self-made questionnaire. Results revealed that the level of mental support teachers receive is high, while instructional and technological support levels are very high. The level of work engagement among the teachers is also high. The teaching position held by teachers is significantly and inversely related to their work engagement, indicating that the higher the teaching position held by the teacher, the lower their work engagement. Additionally, this study reveals that there is no significant relationship between the teachers' highest educational attainment, length of service, or number of training hours and their work engagement. These results underscore the importance of continued support for teachers, especially those in leadership roles, to enhance their engagement and effectiveness in the evolving educational landscape.



References:

  1. Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular distance learning in the new normal education amidst Covid-19. International Journal of Scientific Advances, 2(3), 233-266. Doi: 10.51542/ijscia.v2i3.6
  2. Beteille, T., Ding, E., Molina, E., Pushparatnam, A., & Wilichowski, T. (2020). Three principles to support teacher effectiveness during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33775
  3. Coast D and Max C (2005) Healthy work: productive workplaces. London: The London Health Commission.
  4. Drolet, J., Wu, H., Taylor, M., & Dennehy, A. (2015). Social work and sustainable social development: Teaching and learning strategies for ‘green social work’curriculum. Social Work Education, 34(5), 528-543.
  5. Egdahl, R. H., Walsh, D. C., & Goldbeck, W. B. (Eds.). (2012). Mental wellness  programsfor employees (Vol.9).Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Fullan, M. (2012). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Routledge. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059005
  7. Gandamayu, I. B. M., Antari, N. W. S., & Strisanti, I. A. S. (2022). The level of community compliance in implementing health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, 5(2), 177-182. Doi: 10.21744/ijhms.v5n2.1897
  8. Gamero-Burón, C., & Lassibille, G. (2018). Work engagement among school directors and its impact on teachers'behavior at work. The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(2), 27-39.
  9. Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers' Perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57.
  10. Guest, D. E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social ScienceInformation, 41(2), 255-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041002005
  11. Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12-18.
  12. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: introduction. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 1(9).
  13. Lubit, R. (2004). The tyranny of toxic managers: Applying emotional intelligence to deal with difficult personalities. Ivey Business Journal, 68(4), 1-7.
  14. Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Supply chain disruption during           the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
  15. Padhan, R., & Prabheesh, K. P. (2021). The economics of COVID-19 pandemic: A survey. Economic analysis and policy, 70, 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.012
  16. Perera, H. N., Vosicka, L., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Towards an integrative perspective on the structure of teacher work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.006
  17. Rotter, J. (2011). Rotter internal-external locus of control scale. 28 Measures of Locusof Control, 10.
  18. Samji, H., Wu, J., Ladak, A., Vossen, C., Stewart, E., Dove, N., ... & Snell, G. (2022). Mental health impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on children and youth–a systematic review. Child and adolescent mental health, 27(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12501
  19. Schirmer, W., Geerts, N., Vercruyssen, A., Glorieux, I., & Digital Ageing Consortium. (2022). Digital skills training for older people: The importance of the ‘lifeworld’. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 101, 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104695
  20. Schult, J., Mahler, N., Fauth, B., & Lindner, M. A. (2022). Did students learn less during the COVID-19 pandemic? Reading and mathematics competencies before and after the f      irst pandemic wave. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2061014
  21. Weiner, B. (2021). An attributionally based theory of motivation and emotion:
  22. Whitaker, T. (2009). What great principals do differently. Eye on Education.
  23. Zahed-Babelan, A., Koulaei, G., Moeinikia, M., & Sharif, A. R. (2019). Instructional leadership effects on teachers’ work engagement: Roles of school culture, empowerment, and job characteristics. CEPS Journal, 9(3), 137-156. Doi: 10.25656/01:18161