HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 5 (2024)

Nurturing Resilient Communities: Unveiling the Transformative Potential of Agroecological Preservation in Sustainable Farming

Rony C Conadera

Discipline: Agriculture

 

Abstract:

This study delves into the exploration of agroecological preservation patterns in the Municipality of Lambunao. The main objective is to understand the current practices and their implications on the local environment. To achieve this, a descriptive research method was employed, utilizing a standardized datagathering instrument to collect information from 500 local community farmers, selected through random stratified sampling across various barangays. The research method involved the use of descriptive statistics, including frequency count and ranking, for data analysis. Additionally, inferential research was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskall Wallis test, with a significance level set at 0.05. The results of the study revealed that the Agroecological System in Lambunao is primarily characterized by plain topography, clay soil type, and rice as the main crop. The farmers predominantly practice organic farming as a tradition. Preservation practices were found to be frequently practiced by the entire group and seldom practiced when considering selected variables. However, when focusing on the tradition of organic farming, it was found that farmers always practiced preservation. The study concluded that there were no significant differences in preservation practices in terms of age, sex, selected educational attainment, and number of years in farming. However, significant differences were found in farm land area and selected categories of educational attainment. In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of organic farming and the need to promote preservation practices among local community farmers, offering valuable insights into the agroecological preservation patterns in the Municipality of Lambunao.



References:

  1. Altieri, M. A. (2018). Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture (4th ed.). CRC Press.
  2. Ardales, E. M. (2001). Research Methods in Education. Rex Bookstore, Inc.
  3. Best, J. W. (1992). Research in Education. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  4. Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2006). Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press.
  5. Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2008). The Nature and Properties of Soils (14th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  6. Calmorin, L. P. (1987). Measurement and Evaluation. Rex Bookstore, Inc.
  7. EEA. (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge. European Environment Agency. DOI: 10.2800/82864
  8. FAO. (2017). Rice Market Monitor. Food and Agriculture Organization. DOI: 10.4060/ca8154en
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2014). The State of Food and Agriculture 2014: Innovation in Family Farming. Rome: FAO.
  10. Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., & Zaks, D. P. (2011). Solutions for a Cultivated Planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337-342. DOI: 10.1038/nature10452
  11. Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Merrill Publishing Company.
  12. Gliessman, S. R. (2015). Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. CRC Press.
  13. Hammer, T., Nielsen, A. B., & Svenningsen, S. R. (2004). GIS-based Land-use Suitability Analysis: A Critical Overview. Progress in Physical Geography, 28(3), 343-373. DOI: 10.1191/0309133304pp416ra
  14. Johnson, M. (2018). Land Ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018          Edition).
  15. Jupp, V. (2006). The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
  16. Kasanko, M., Jaeger, J. A. G., & Kienast, F. (2006). Landscape Fragmentation in Europe. Joint Research Centre,      Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
  17. Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., & Seidel, R. (2005). Environmental, Energetic, and Economic Comparisons of Organic and Conventional Farming Systems. BioScience, 55(7), 573-582. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0573:EEAECO]2.0.CO;2
  18. Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., ... & Zhang, F. (2018). Global Assessment of Agricultural System Redesign for Sustainable Intensification. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 441-446. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5
  19. Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). Organic Agriculture in the Twenty-First Century. Nature Plants, 2(2),           15221. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2015.221
  20. Ricciardi, V., Ramankutty, N., Mehrabi, Z., Jarvis, L., Chookolingo, B., & Vreugdenhil, R. (2018). How Much         Land-based Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Can Be Achieved Without Compromising Food Security and Environmental Goals? Global Change Biology, 24(10), 4308-4320. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14321
  21. Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E. A., ... & Tubiello, F. (2019). Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (pp. 43-97). IPCC.
  22. Slavin, R. E. (1984). Educational Research in an Age of Accountability. Allyn and Bacon.
  23. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations General Assembly.
  24. Wauters, E., Bielders, C., & Poesen, J. (2010). Farmers' Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in Belgium: An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Agri-environmental Domain. Land Use Policy, 27(1), 86-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.002
  25. World Bank. (2019). Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1328-9