HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 7 (2024)

Effects of the Single-Entry Approach Program on Labor Disputes as Implemented by the Department of Labor and Employment

Rodolfo O. Sildora Jr. | Mon Carlo D. Frejoles | Mick Ian M Cornelia

Discipline: Social Sciences

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to determine the effects of the Single-Entry Approach program on labor disputes as implemented by the Department of Labor and Employment in Negros Oriental Field Office. The researcher employed a descriptive-correlational design. The 120 respondents (60 requesting parties and 60 responding parties) were randomly selected clients who were involved in the SEnA program of the DOLE Negros Oriental Field Office. The researcher used a validated questionnaire to gather data and applied statistical methods such as percentage, weighted mean, mean, and Spearman’s rank order correlation coefficient. The findings revealed high awareness and satisfaction for both the requesting and responding parties, indicating a correlation between clients’ awareness of the SEnA program and their satisfaction levels. However, the fact that RFAs are still being referred to other agencies only shows that certain aspects of the program require more enhancement. Specifically, the client's awareness of the SENA program, communication effectiveness, and conciliation-mediation skills could lead to increased settlement rates and reduced referrals to the NLRC.



References:

  1. Adeniran, A. O. (2019). Application of Likert scale’s type and Cronbach’s alpha analysis in an airport perception study. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 2(4), 1-5.
  2. Adham, T. K. I. (2023). Conflict Resolution in Team: Analyzing the of Conflicts and Best Skills for Resolution. Sch J Eng Tech, 8, 152-162.
  3. Adu-Oppong, A. A., & Agyin-Birikorang, E. (2014). Communication in the workplace: guidelines for improving effectiveness. Global Journal of Commerce & Management Perspective, 3(5), 208–213. http://gifre.org/library/upload/volume/208-213-communication-vol-3-5-gjcmp.pdf
  4. Curado, C., Henriques, P. L., Jerónimo, H. M., & Azevedo, J. (2022). The Contribution of communication to Employee Satisfaction in Service Firms: A Causal Configurational analysis. Vision, 097226292211011. doi: 10.1177/09722629221101157
  5. Daen, M. H. (2018). Effectiveness of Information Dissemination of the Local Government Unit of Malilipot. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21482.44489
  6. De Ramos, G. S., & Pasion, E. T. (2023). Managing communication challenges towards dispute resolution in court annexed mediation. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(2), 7–16. doi: 10.54536/ajmri.v2i2.1148
  7. Department of Labor and Employment. (n.d.). About SEnA. Retrieved from https://www.dole.gov.ph/sena-contents/
  8. DOLE7 Memo No. 638 s-2022. (2022). Department Order No. 638, Series of 2022.
  9. Folorunsho, S. (2018). Mediation: an emerging alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism in Nigeria Industrial Relations System. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3294617
  10. Francisco, M. K., Gaspar, J., Quimoyog, M., Malang, B. P., Garcia-Vigonte, F., & Abante, M. V. (2022). The Effectiveness of Virtual Conciliation-Mediation on National Labor Relations Commission-National Capital Region Arbitration Branch’s (NCRAB) Single-Entry Approach (SEnA) Settlement Rate during COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Science Research Network. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4261332
  11. Gonzales, L. a. S. (2022). Implementation of barangay justice system and community satisfaction in the municipality of calauan, laguna: basis for intervention program. International Journal of Research Publications, 104(1). doi: 10.47119/ijrp1001041720223512
  12. Hannaway, H.-A., & McKenzie, A. (2021, October 19). Clarity in dispute resolution clauses. Retrieved from https://www.harneys.com/insights/clarity-in-dispute-resolution-clauses/
  13. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2020). Happiness and the quality of government. doi: 10.3386/w26840
  14. Ilac, E. J. D., & Presbitero, A. (2022). Conflict management in the indigenous community of Batad in the Philippines: A system dynamic perspective. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 40(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1002/crq.21347
  15. Ilies, I. (2022). A critical assessment of the conciliation hearing in Germany and South Africa from a comparative point of view.
  16. Itzchakov, G., & Reis, H. T. (2023). Listening and perceived responsiveness: Unveiling the significance and exploring crucial research endeavors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101662. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101662
  17. Jordan, S. L., Palmer, J. C., Daniels, S. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2022). Subjectivity in fairness perceptions: How heuristics and self‐efficacy shape the fairness expectations and perceptions of organisational newcomers. Applied Psychology, 71(1), 103-128.
  18. Kosec, K., & Wantchekon, L. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery? World Development, 125, 104376. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017
  19. Lutta, D. (2022, November 21). Importance of Impartiality in Conflict Resolution. Retrieved from https://diana-lutta.medium.com/importance-of-impartiality-in-conflict-resolution-8ab2b6818c09
  20. Mattila, A. S., & Mount, D. J. (2006). The impact of timeliness on complaint satisfaction in the context of Call-Centers. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 14(3), 5–16. doi: 10.1300/j150v14n03_02
  21. Mehra, P., & Nickerson, C. (2019). Organizational communication and job satisfaction: what role do generational differences play? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 524–547. doi: 10.1108/ijoa-12-2017-1297
  22. Nicuesa, A. E. V. (2018). Reputational feedback systems and consumer rights: Improving the European online redress system. IJODR, 5, 122.
  23. Ocampo, L., Alinsub, J., Casul, R. A., Enquig, G., Luar, M., Panuncillon, N., Bongo, M. F., & Ocampo, C. O. (2019). Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100604. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.002
  24. Pinheiro, A., Passos, A., & Stoleroff, A. (2019). Mediation and conciliation in collective labor conflicts in Portugal. In Industrial relations & conflict management (pp. 161–174). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92531-8_11
  25. Rebayla, E. J. T., Segre, J. M., Rojas, M. a. V., & Indita, W. (2023). Effectiveness of conciliation mediation in regional arbitration branch – National Capital region. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(1), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.01.21
  26. Rosamund, Y. (2018). A case study of mediators maintaining impartiality within practice. https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/890y0/a-case-study-of-mediators-maintaining-impartiality-within-practice
  27. Sharma, M. (2020). A Fair Alternative to Unfair Arbitration: Proposing an Ombudsman Scheme for Consumer Dispute Resolution in the USA. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association.
  28. Silbey, S. S., & Merry, S. E. (2018). Mediator settlement strategies. In Mediation (pp. 183-208). Routledge.
  29. Sillars, A. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (2013). Communication strategies in conflict and mediation. In Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 163-190). Routledge.
  30. Singer, L. (2018). Settling disputes: Conflict resolution in business, families, and the legal system. Routledge.
  31. Soriano, I. D., Maniago, D. S., & Mendoza, K. J. A. (2022). Mandatory mediation of civil cases in a highly urbanized city. International Journal of Law and Public Policy, 4(2), 55–65. doi: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0402.396
  32. Toohey, L. (2018). Enhancing Mediation in the Asia-Pacific: The Interaction of the ARMO Regime with Existing Dispute Settlement Mechanisms. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3153308.
  33. Vu, T. (2021). Service Quality and Its Impact On Customer Satisfaction. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.17089454. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356592279_Service_Quality_And_Its_Impact_On_Customer_Satisfaction