Home⇛Journal of Education, Management, and Development Studies⇛vol. 1 no. 2 (2021)

Exit Slips As Predictor of Academic Performance

Raymart Basco

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Formative assessment plays a vital role in the delivery of quality and relevant education among learners. Data derived from the assessment results provide pieces of evidence for teachers to determine learners who need assistance, advance instructional objectives, track learners’ progress toward those standards, and identify what intervention and support are required. This descriptive-survey research examined the impact of exit slips in predicting intermediate pupils’ science achievement. Seventy-three pupils were involved in the study who were selected through a total sampling. Weighted mean, ranking, standard deviation, mean percentage score, frequency, Pearson correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination were utilized to process and analyze statistically the data using SPSS. The findings of the study highlighted that exit slips can help learners in their learning since they reflect pupils’ understanding and increase accountability among them. The results revealed that there was a high positive association between the self-rating report and the academic performance of the respondents. The impact of self-reported rating was found significant on the performance of the pupils. Hence, when teachers took necessary and relevant remediation as well as enrichment based on the self-reported rating, academic performance may be improved. It was recommended that teachers may adapt the use of exit slips in their classes to improve academic performance among learners.



References:

  1. Baron, L. M. (2016, August). Formative assessment at work in the classroom. The Mathematics Teacher, 110(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.110.1.0046
  2. Basco, R. (2020). Effectiveness of science infographics in improving academic performance among sixth grade pupils of one laboratory school in the Philippines. Research in Pedagogy, 10(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2002313b
  3. Berenson, M. (2017). Levels of exit slip feedback in secondary mathematics. Northern Illinois University. https://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/20770
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009, February). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  5. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Develop a student-centered mind-set for formative assessment. Voices from the Middle, 21(1). https://www.proquest.com/openview/1178bef422b12a061e7eff22cb82a841/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=33274
  6. Danley, A., McCoy, A., & Weed, R. (2006). Exit tickets open the door to university learning. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 11, 48–58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1110134
  7. Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide science (Grade 3 to Grade 10). Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Science-CG_with-tagged-sciequipment_revised.pdf
  8. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2017 - Policy guidelines on system assessment in the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/06/05/do-29-s-2017-policy-guidelines-on-system-assessment-in-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/
  9. Department of Education. (2019). PISA 2018 national report of the Philippines (Tech. Rep.). Department of Education.
  10. DepEd Cordillera Administrative Region. (2019). Result of the National Achievement Test (NAT) for School Year 2016-2017 and 2017-2018, Regional Memorandum 157, 2019 (Tech. Rep.).
  11. Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021, March). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
  12. Hamdy, M. F., & Kalisah, L. M. (2020, June). The effectiveness of using exit slips on improving EFL learners’ writing ability and reading comprehension. English Instruction, 3(1), 1–14. http://journals.nalarglobal.org/index.php/ei/article/view/54
  13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007, March). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  14. Izor, K. (2019, April). The effect of exit slips on student motivation within the classroom. Honors Projects. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/446
  15. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
  16. Leigh, S. R. (2012). The classroom is alive with the sound of thinking: The power of the exit slip. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 189–196. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ996265
  17. Lim, W. N. (2017, April). Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using Socrative. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 404–412). Athens, Greece: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942879
  18. Llamas-Nistal, M., Fernández-Iglesias, M. J., González-Tato, J., & Mikic-Fonte, F. A. (2013, March). Blended e-assessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world. Computers & Education, 62, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.021
  19. Marzano, R. J. (2012). Art and science of teaching / The many uses of exit slips. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-many-uses-of-exit-slips
  20. Mastromonaco, A. (2015). Exit tickets’ effect on engagement and concept attainment in high school science (Master of Science, Dominican University of California). https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2015.edu.10
  21. Mohamadi, Z. (2018, December). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
  22. Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., Kelly, D., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Reports. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/index.html
  23. National Council of Teachers of English. (2013). Formative assessment that truly informs instruction. https://ncte.org/statement/formative-assessment/
  24. National Education Testing and Research Center. (2012). NAT overview and 2012 results. National Education Testing and Research Center.
  25. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  26. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What school life means for students’ lives. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
  27. Prieto, J. P.-A., & Escobar, A. H. (2016). Exit tickets’ effect on engagement in college classrooms. EDULEARN16 Proceedings, 5915–5918. https://library.iated.org/view/PAZALBOPRIETO2016EXI
  28. Sarles, P., & Owen, D. (2012, November). Exit tickets: The reflective ticket to understanding.
  29. Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.
  30. Sosa, T. (2013, March). Using digital exit tickets for formative assessment in a technology integration class. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2444–2452). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48469/.
  31. The Teacher Toolkit. (2021). Exit ticket. http://www.theteachertoolkit.com/index.php/tool/exitticket

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic