Online Physical Education: Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic Experiences
Julia Pearl M. Arroyo | Teodora M. Salubayba
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
The study aimed to explore the online physical education (OLPE) program of a university in Metro
Manila during the COVID-19 pandemic. The researcher used a qualitative- case study research design. It
focused on providing an in-depth description of the experiences of students and teachers in OLPE courses
during the pandemic and analyzing the experiences concerning the achievement of P.E. and physical literacy
goals. Interviews with physical education teachers and students were conducted. It also used information
from online synchronous P.E. class observations and documents provided by teachers (course packs and
syllabi). Results showed that the different components of the learning environment and class design were
affected by the sudden shift to online mode and the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic effects. The
OLPE fell short of achieving the NASPE PE Objectives 1 and 4, the development of sport motor skills and
the student's sense of responsible personal and social behavior. On the other hand, the OLPE courses
achieved NASPE P.E. objectives 2, 3, and 5. These were the student's fitness and health (physical and
mental), the value of physical activity for health, and the knowledge of the principles and concepts of fitness
and exercise. The results implied that practical online physical education courses must have meaningful
two-way communication across all stakeholders, especially between teachers and students; that physical
education teachers should collaborate; that teachers and students should meaningfully connect as part of
one community, and that fun and enjoyment in P.E. classes should be a priority in designing the class
activities within the learning environment.
References:
- A Office of the Vice-President for Academic Affairs. (2020, September 2). Academic and Student Affairs Roadmaps for AY 2020-2021. OVPAA Memorandum No. 2020-100. Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
- American College of Sports Medicine. (2010). ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- American College of Sports Medicine. (2016). ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- Beard, J., & Konukman, F. (2020). Teaching Online Physical Education: The Art of Connecting in the Digital Classroom. Journal Of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(7), 49-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1785772
- Daum, D. N., & Woods, A. M. (2015). Physical Education Teacher Educator’s Perceptions Toward and Understanding of K-12 Online Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(4), 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0146
- Daum, D., & Buschner, C. (2012). The status of secondary online physical education in the United States. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 31, 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.31.1.86
- Department of Education. (2016, May). K - 12 P.E. Curriculum Guide DEPED. http://lrmds.deped.gov.ph/
- Department of Education. (2019, December 9). Deped Orders: Revised Physical Fitness Test Manual DO_s2019_034. Retrieved from the Republic of the Philippines, Department of Education: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/12/09/december-9-2019-do-034-s-2019-revised-physical-fitness-test-manual/
- Department of Education Culture and Sports. (1990, June 4). Guidelines and Standards for Collegiate Service Physical Education Program. DECS Order No. 58, s. 1990. Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines: Department of Education Culture and Sports.
- Eisner, E. (1976). Educational Connoisseurship and Critism: Their Form and Functions in Educational Evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135 - 150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332067
- Foye, B. (2024, February). The evolution of teaching physical education online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2024.2315184
- Given, L. (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
- He, L., & Gong, J. (2024). Micro-class + MOOC: Reality review and innovation direction of online physical education curriculum in China during the “COVID-19” epidemic. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2167306
- Heryanto, J., Setiawan, E., Abdul Gani, R., & Ifdil, P. (2024). Academic performance of online physical education learning during COVID-19 outbreak: systematic literature review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26723
- Jeong, H.-C., & So, W.-Y. (2020). Difficulties of Online Physical Education Classes in Middle and High School and an Efficient Operation Plan to Address Them. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 7279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197279
- Larbi-Apau, J., & Kwofie, B. (2024). Students’ online learning experience during emergency remote teaching in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241244496
- Mohnsen, B. (2012). Implementing Online Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2012.10598727
- National Association for Sport and Physical Education (2007). Initial Guidelines for Online Physical Education (Position Statement). Reston, VA, USA.
- Rosa, E., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Theory of Human Development: Its Evolution From Ecology to Bioecology. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5(6), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022
- SHAPE America - Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2015). Physical Education Program Checklist. Reston, VA, USA.
- SHAPE America - Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2018). Guidelines for K-12 Online Physical Education. SHAPEAmerica. www.shapeamerica.org
- Silverman, S. (1997). Technology and physical education: Present, possibilities, and potential problems. Quest, 49(3), 306-314.
- Song, X., & Cheong, J. (2024). An Examination of Chinese Physical Education Teachers’ Teaching Efficacy and Technology Self-Efficacy at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. SAGE Open, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241241933
- Tagimaucia, V., D’Souza, G. S., & Chand, S. P. (2024, February). Exploring Online Physical Education Teaching: What Have We Done and What Have We Learnt? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7431
- Treschman, P., Stylianou, M., & Brooks, C. (2024). A scoping review of feedback in physical education: Conceptualisations and the role of teachers and students. European Physical Education Review, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241230829
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C.
- UNESCO. (2012, March 13). UNESCO Promoting Quality Physical Education Policy. https://en.unesco.org/themes/sport-and-anti-doping/sports-education/qpe
- Varea, V., & Gonzalez-Calvo, G. (2020). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of COVID-19. Sport, Education and Society, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814
- Vélez-Agosto, N. M., Soto-Crespo, J. G., Vizcarrondo-Oppenheimer, M., Vega-Molina, S., & Coll, C. G. (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory Revision: Moving Culture From the Macro Into the Micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617704397
- Wackerhage, H., Everett, R., Krüger, K., Murgia, M., Simon, P., Gehlert, S., Neuberger, E., Baumert, P., & Schönfelder, M. (2020). Sport, exercise and COVID-19, the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Sportmedizin/German Journal of Sports Medicine, 71(5), E1–E12. https://doi.org/10.5960/dzsm.2020.441
- Walker Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Seven Principles for Good Teaching. University of Tennessee Chattanooga: https://www.utc.edu/academic-affairs/walker-center-for-teaching-and-learning/teaching-resources/pedagogical-strategies-and-techniques/seven-principles-for-good-teaching
- WHO. (2020, May). WHO #HealthyAtHome. World Health Organization: https://www.who.int/news-room/campaigns/connecting-the-world-to-combat-coronavirus/healthyathome/healthyathome---physical-activity.
- Yüksel, I. (2010). How to Conduct a Qualitative Program Evaluation in the Light of Eisner’s Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism Model. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 78 - 83.
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)