Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 4 (2024)

The Analysis on the Writing Proficiency of Students in Non- board Examination Programs: A Convergent Parallel Approach

Princess Nerrah T Rosas | Jonelson C. Escandallo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to describe the lived experiences of non-board program students in a local college with regards to their writing proficiency. This study engaged mixed method design, utilizing parallel convergent approach. Based on the results of the study, it was determined that the level of writing proficiency of non-board program students is 72.84% which is moderate, highlighting the mechanics proficiency having the lowest mean of 61.53%. The results from the quantitative and qualitative converged when they were being corroborated. The results also showed that non-board program students experienced challenges of articulating thoughts, organizing ideas, navigating language intricacies, and managing time effectively in their writing process. Additionally, they improve writing skills through practice, exposure, feedback, diverse language learning strategies, and enhanced writing process efficiency. In conclusion, the study reveals that non-board program students demonstrate a moderate level of writing proficiency, with particular struggles in mechanics. Despite these challenges, they develop their writing skills through practice, feedback, and strategic approaches to improving language use and writing efficiency.



References:

  1. Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Abduh, M. Y. M. (2021). English writing proficiency and apprehensions among Saudi College students: Facts and remedies. TESOL international journal, 16(1), 34-56. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1329867
  2. Alamri, H. R., & Al-Tunisi, N. T. (2019). Writing proficiency levels among Arabic and English language student teachers and their perceptions of challenges in writing skill. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlll/62-07
  3. Albelihi, H.H.M., & Al-Ahdal, A.A.M.H. (2021). EFL students' writing performance: A study of the role of peer and small-group feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 2224-2234. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/4008
  4. Alqasham, F. H., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2022). Effectiveness of mind-mapping as a digital brainstorming technique in enhancing attitudes of Saudi EFL learners to writing skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2). http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3819
  5. Alobaid, A. (2020). Smart multimedia learning of ICT: role and impact on language learners’ writing fluency—YouTube online English learning resources as an example. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40561-020-00134-7
  6. Ballan, D. (2023). Unraveling the depths of George Orwell’s 1984: An in-depth analysis, author insights, and modern-day relevance. English Plus Podcast. https://englishpluspodcast.com/unraveling-the-depths-of-george-orwells-1984-an-in-depth-analysis-author-insights-and-modern-day-relevance/
  7. Battista, A., & Torre, D. (2023). Mixed methods research designs. Medical Teacher, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2200118 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2200118
  8. Escandallo, J.C., & Baradillo, D. (2024). A sequential explanatory approach on the relationship between social literacy and student engagement as mediated by English speaking skills. EPRA International of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR).
  9. Espinosa, D., & Baradillo, D. (2024). Strategies and Motivation as Determinants of Writing Proficiency among Students of Teacher Education Institutions in Region Xi: A Mixed Methods Study. EPRA Journals. https://eprajournals.com/IJMR/article/13162/
  10. Gunantar, D. A. A., & Rosaria, S. D. (2023). Difficulties of non-English study program students in carrying out the Institutional TOEFL test. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 16(1), 119-134. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ENGEDU/article/view/16106.
  11. Harding, T., & Whitehead, D. (2013). Analysing data in qualitative research. Nursing & midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice, 5, 141-160. https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=tl&lr=&id=lNvWDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA127&dq=Harding,+T.,+%26+Whitehead,+D.+(2013).+Analysing+data+in+qualitative+research.+Nursing+%26+midwifery+research:+Methods+and+appraisal+for+evidence-based+practice,+5,+141-160.&ots=CUuHcmNXLJ&sig=5_TvSZWXRcnvETOwwIFkOl7KK1A&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  12. Jarum, J., & Ayudiari, D. (2022). EFL learners’ procrastination in completing academic writing tasks: The factors and its possible Effects. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 1408-1425. http://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/3158.
  13. Lee, S. (2014). Korean EFL university students’ English vocabulary size and their writing proficiency. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 13(2), 21-43. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shinwoong-Lee/publication/284308701_Korean_EFL_University_Students'_English_Vocabulary_Size_and_Their_Writing_Proficiency/links/61680cf325be2600ace677c2/Korean-EFL-University-Students-English-Vocabulary-Size-and-Their-Writing-Proficiency.pdf.
  14. Maba, W. (2023). Assessment of students’ writing acquisition. International Journal of Social Science. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/IJSS/article/view/4647.
  15. Mayekti, M. H. (2020). A study on college students' writing competence. https://www.e-journal.unper.ac.id/index.php/ALTICS/article/view/355.
  16. Mustafa, M., & Syahriani, I. (2023). Genre_based SFL analysis of academic writing in English: Investigating linguistic features and genre conventions in student's sssay. Elite: English and Literature Journal, 10(1), 1-14. https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/elite/article/view/36563.
  17. Nguyen, T. D., Shih, M. H., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2021). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39, 665-710. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10619-020-07315-w
  18. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023, June 22). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/
  19. Nueva, J. C. (2018). Students’ writing needs: basis for language intervention program. CMU Journal of Science, 20(2), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.56498/31202154
  20. Perdana, I., Bungai, J., Wihastyanang, W. D., Budhiono, R. H., & Tanate, V. L. (2023). The Relationship between undergraduate students' writing knowledge and writing performance. International Journal of Language Education, 7(2), 291-303. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1399062
  21. Qian, D. D., & Lin, L. H. F. (2019). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and language proficiency. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15-29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586
  22. Rahmaniah, R., & Asbah, A. (2018). The speaking difficulties encountered by non-English students in language classroom. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 6(2), 22-25 https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/JELTL/article/view/749
  23. Sayin, A., & Kahraman, N. (2020). A measurement tool for repeated measurement of assessment of university students’ writing skill: development and evaluation. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, doi: 10.21031/EPOD.639148 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/epod/article/639148.
  24. Sparks, J. R., Song, Y., Brantley, W., & Liu, O. L. (2014). Assessing written communication in higher education: Review and recommendations for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1-52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ets2.12035
  25. Sun, T., & Wang, C. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. *System, 90*, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221
  26. Suraprajit, P. (2021). An analysis of errors in english essays written by thai non-english major students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 12-19. https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/803.
  27. Yuliawati, L. (2021). The mechanics accuracy of students’ writing. English Teaching Journal, 9(1),46-53. https://scholar.archive.org/work/xdsipiwkdjcrhew7ivhabujbry/access/wayback/http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/ETJ/article/download/8890/pdf.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic