Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 4 (2024)

Self- efficacy and Students’ Engagement of English Pre- service Teachers: A Convergent Design

Jericho D Lugnasin | Deveyvon L Espinosa

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored how self-efficacy affects the students’ engagement of English preservice teachers in teacher education program in a local college of Davao del Norte, Philippines. The researchers used mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods (Halcomb & Hickman, 2015). In quantitative phase the data was analyzed in Data Analytical technique: Mean, Standard Deviation, Pearson-r, and Coefficient of variation were used for analyzing the participants’ average response. And also, the qualitative phase engaged in in-depth interviews and focus group discussion that qualitative data analysis, the researchers employed coding and thematic analysis. The following findings revealed significant correlation between self-efficacy and students’ engagement among pre-service teachers, as determined by the Mean, R-value, and P-value. The study’s results revealed different experiences, coping mechanisms, and insights regarding the impact of self-efficacy on students’ engagement. On the data integration, data found that both quantitative and qualitative are merging, hence, the nature of data integration of both phases is connecting and confirming. It can be concluded that selfefficacy does play an important role in boosting students’ engagement, contributing to their personal development and active participation in learning process. This research shows the English pre-service teachers have a significantly high of perceived self-efficacy in listening, reading writing, and speaking, high students’ engagement behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement.



References:

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
  2. Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2020). An interactive learning environment to empower engagement in Mathematics. ID&A INTERACTION DESIGN & ARCHITECTURE (S), 45, 302-321.
  3. Cabaroglu, N. (2014). Professional development through action research: Impact on self-efficacy. System, 44, 79-88.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  5. Delfino, A. P. (2019). STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS OF PARTIDO STATE UNIVERSITY. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.05
  6. Enerio, A. J. (2021). Factors and Levels of Student engagement in a State College: A Mixed-Methods Study. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 24, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v24i1.4716
  7. Escandallo, J. C., & Baradillo, D. (2024). A sequential explanatory approach on the relationship between social literacy and student engagement as mediated by English speaking skills. EPRA International of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR).
  8. Espinosa, D. (2021). A Look into the Sense of Efficacy of Non-IP Elementary Public School Teachers Teaching Mother Tongue Language: A Parallel Convergent Approach. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. Vol, 6 (5).
  9. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906
  10. Halcomb, E. J., & Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research.
  11. Halif, M. M., Hassan, N., Sumardi, N. A., Omar, A. S., Ali, S., Aziz, R. A., Majid, A. A., & Salleh, N. F. (2020). Moderating Effects of Student Motivation on the Relationship between Learning Styles and Student Engagement. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10301
  12. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
  13. Hoppe, H. M. (2022). The Relationship Between Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement of First-Time First-Year Students Enrolled at a Technical College (Doctoral dissertation, Coastal Carolina University).
  14. Kolb, D. A. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB1767575X
  15. Laupheimer, C. (2019). Empowered Learning Systems in Student Successt. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2019.edu.13
  16. Martin, K., Galentino, R., & Townsend, L. (2014). Community college student success. Community College Review, 42(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552114528972
  17. McKenna, S., Clarence-Fincham, J., Boughey, C., Wels, H., & van den Heavel, H. (Eds.). (2017). Strengthening postgraduate supervision (Vol. 11). African Sun Media.
  18. Oberst, R. K., Hedderich, B., & Miguel Molina, M. B. D. (2022). A literature review on self-efficacy and stress among university students. In Proceedings 3rd International Conference. Business Meets Technology (pp. 79-86). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
  19. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Springer eBooks (pp. 259–282). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
  20. Saefudin, W., Sriwiyanti, S., & Yusoff, S. H. M. (2021). ROLE OF SOCIAL SUPPORT TOWARD STUDENT ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY IN ONLINE LEARNING DURING PANDEMIC. JURNAL TATSQIF, 19(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v19i2.4221
  21. Singh, A., Gulati, M., Kumar, M., Khadse, K., & Kishore, R. (2022). The impact of self-efficacy on student engagement in online learning: Mediating the role of motivation. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 8528-8536.
  22. Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
  23. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 56–65). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005
  24. Thomas, L. (2015). Developing Inclusive Learning to Improve the Engagement, Belonging, Retention, and Success of Students from Diverse Groups. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 135–159). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100213-1.00009-3
  25. Tian, M., Lu, G., Yin, H., & Li, L. (2020). Student engagement for sustainability of Chinese international education: The case of international undergraduate students in China. Sustainability, 12(17), 6831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176831
  26. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548.
  27. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic