Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 4 (2024)

Looking through the Narratives of School- based Feeding Program Coordinators: A Phenomenology

Glecyl Jane A Verallo | Jobell B Jajalla

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to explore the narratives of school-based feeding program coordinators, focusing on their experiences, coping mechanisms, and insights in organizing and facilitating feeding programs. A qualitative phenomenological approach was utilized, involving in-depth interviews with 14 coordinators from public elementary schools in Kapalong, Davao del Norte, selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes. Findings revealed challenges such as logistical issues, time constraints, and financial limitations, with coordinators relying on collegial support and resilience to manage these difficulties. Key insights emphasized patience, flexibility, and the program's positive impact on students' hunger alleviation and academic performance. The study concluded that the coordinators' experiences offer valuable lessons for enhancing the effectiveness of school-based feeding initiatives, underscoring the need for sustained support and resource allocation.



References:

  1. Aranguren, F., Gegabalen, R., Lozano, E., Mojica, R. J., Mondares, T., Agawin, M., & Quinto, L. (2020). Cases of undernutrition among children in a selected elementary school. Lyceum of the Philippines University Laguna. https://lpulaguna.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/4.-Aranguren-Gegabelen-Lozano-Mojica-Mondares-Agawin-Quinto-Undernutrition.pdf
  2. Bhandari, P. (2022). Ethical considerations in research: Types & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-ethics/
  3. Bilbar, A. (2020). Effectiveness of school's feeding program in coping pupils' malnutrition on their academic performance. ResearchGate. file:///C:/Users/pc/Downloads/EffectivenessofSchoolsFeedingPrograminCopingPupilsMalnutritiononTheirAcademicPerformance.pdf
  4. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
  5. Candelanza, J., & Comighud, S. M. (2020). Looking at the perceived benefits of feeding program in the eyes of the stakeholders. ResearchGate. file:///C:/Users/pc/Downloads/LookingatthePerceivedBenefitsofFeedingProgram.pdf
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1149107.pdf
  7. Kalu, F. A., & Bwalya, J. C. (2017). What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements. International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711
  8. Kirsh, D. (2019). How the Belmont Report clarified informed consent. Massive Device.
  9. Klykken, F. H. (2021). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
  10. Manen, V. (1990). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1149107.pdf
  11. Mayan, M. (2016). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315429250
  12. Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (2013). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods, 218–240.
  13. Texas Education Agency. (2022). Texas school. https://tea.texas.gov/texas-schools

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic