Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 3 (2025)

Stakeholders’ Contribution to the Cotabato Historical Conflict: Experiences and Perspectives on Conflict

Erwin A. Mallo

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Understanding stakeholders' contributions to the Cotabato historical conflict has agreeable benefits for the community, especially for human security. Stakeholders were the primary actors in times of conflict. This study employed phenomenological research design to capture stakeholders' experiences about their contributions in pre- and post-conflict scenarios. Results show promising initiatives on how the inter-agency collaborative efforts stabilize and maintain the safety among the people. The historical conflicts in Cotabato come in series, massive displacement and attacks. Cultural stereotyping and misunderstanding became the dividing factors that caused the conflict to last so long. The late 1960s to 2000s were the years when the province suffered from economic losses and failure, unstable living conditions, starvation, and discrimination brought by different parties involved between GRP vs. Blackshirt; this war was between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro people who inhabited the Province of Cotabato that called themselves as Blackshirt, GRP vs. NPA; this war was between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the New Peoples' Army who fought for reform the government; GRP and a group of Umbrakato and ILAGA vs. Moro; the Ilonggo Land Grabbers Association was headed by Umbrakato who fought against the Moro and maintained alliance with the Philippine government. However, LGU, military, and barangay officials' commitment to normalizing the situation was the highest support. As a result, people return home confident in a peaceful situation and hoping for peace. Another striking initiative was headed by LGUs, NGOs, and religious groups to health care facilities and food. A community-based program like Duyog Ramadhan helped increase community awareness and encourage cooperation. On the other hand, establishing military camps and observatory units to identify conflicted areas improves human security. This study, therefore, provides a meaningful reference to how, in conflict situations, stakeholders can improve areas where human security is challenged.



References:

  1. Adam, J. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of the Micro-level Genealogies of Conflict in the Philippines’ Mindanao Island and Indonesia’s Ambon Island. Oxford Development Studies, 41(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2013.789841
  2. Adriano, F., & Parks, T. (2013). The Case of Mindanao, Philippines. In The Contested Corners of Asia: Subnational Conflict and International Development Assistance. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5659ab5r
  3. Åkebo, M. (2020). Ceasefire Rationales : A Comparative Study of Ceasefires in the Moro and Communist Conflicts in the Philippines. International Peacekeeping, 0(0), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2020.1831918
  4. Asuna, Y., & Wataru, K. (2020). The Arts of Everyday Peacebuilding : Cohabitation, Conversion, and Intermarriage of Muslims and Christians in the Southern Philippines. Southeast Asian Studies, 9(1), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.9.1
  5. Berhe, M. G. (2017). The transition from war to peace : the Ethiopian disarmament, demobilization and reintegration experience. Routledge, 26(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2017.1297580
  6. Cagoco- Guiam, R. (2015). Peacebuilding from Below: Conflict Resolution, the Role of Women, and Peace Governance in select Cotabato, Maguindanao, and Sultan Kudarat communities. In R. A. Hall (Ed.), No More Guns: Documenting Local Conflict Resolution Initiatives in Select Asian Communities (pp. 37–49). University of the Philippines Visayas.
  7. Capuno, J. J. (2020). Probing Conflict Contagion and Casualties in Mindanao, Philippines. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(7), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1608742
  8. Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  9. Damoah, I. S., Mouzughi, Y., & Kumi, D. K. (2020). The effects of government construction projects abandonment: stakeholders’ perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(5), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1486172
  10. Daylusan - Fiesta, M. (2019). Coping with Armed Conflict: The Case of the Women and Children in Aleosan, Cotabato. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409188
  11. de la Torre, E. M., Rossi, F., & Sagarra, M. (2019). Who benefits from HEIs engagement? An analysis of priority stakeholders and activity profiles of HEIs in the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2163–2182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1479847
  12. Duarte Alonso, A., & Nyanjom, J. (2017). Local stakeholders, role, and tourism development. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(5), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1078782
  13. Espesor, J. (2017). Waltzing with the powerful: Understanding NGOs in a game of power in conflict-ridden Mindanao. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 66–83.
  14. Gutierrez, E. (2003). From Ilaga to Abu Sayyaf: New Entrepreneurs in Violence and Their Impact on Local Politics in Mindanao. Philippine Political Science Journal, 24(47), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2003.975425037–41
  15. Ilagan, G. T. (2014). Multi-stakeholder Security Strategies That De-escalate Armed Violence in Mindanao. Open Journal of Social Science Research, 2(3), 78. https://doi.org/10.12966/ojssr.09.02.2014
  16. Imbong, R. A. (2019). Forging a Just and Lasting Peace in the Philippines. Peace Review, 31(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2019.1613598
  17. Loesch, J. (2017). The GPH-MILF Peace Process in the Philippines to Prevent and Transform Violent Extremism in Mindanao. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 12(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1331747
  18. Macasalong, M. S. (2013). The Liberation on Movements in Mindanao: Root Causes and Prospects for Peace. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
  19. Mallo, E. (2024). From Terrorism to Peaceful Tourism: Status of Sustainable Tourism in Cotabato Province. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0110
  20. Mallo, E. A. (2024). Exploring the Transition Processes towards Peace. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3), 396–439. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10827312
  21. Mendoza, R. (2020). The Ideology of Tri-People : A Critical Discourse Analysis. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v15i1.1059
  22. Neumann, H. (2010). Reframing identities and social practices despite the war. Peace Review, 22(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402651003751487
  23. Ochiai, N. (2016). The Mindanao conflict: Efforts for building peace through development. Asia-Pacific Review, 23(2), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2016.1254364
  24. Özerdem, A., & Podder, S. (2012). Grassroots and Rebellion: A Study on the Future of the Moro Struggle in Mindanao, Philippines. Civil Wars, 14(4), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2012.740202
  25. South, A. (2017). Mindanao : The Long Journey to Peace and Prosperity. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 00(00), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1318412
  26. Verbrugge, B., Adam, J., & Boer, D. (2014). Peacemaking and State-Society Interactions in Conflict-torn Mindanao, Philippines. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/47nnjpk8
  27. Weder, N., García-Nieto, R., & Canneti-Nisim, D. (2010). Peace, reconciliation, and Tolerance in the Middle East: The impact of People-to-People peace building initiatives among Israeli Jews and Palestinians who lost a first-degree family member due to the conflict: A pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health, 39(4), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411390404
  28. Wu, S., & Zhang, S. (2014). Game analysis of Chinese stakeholders in collective forest rights system reform. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 12(4), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2014.953777

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic