Discipline: Education
Effective teaching strategies not only engage students in learning but also enhance teachers' self-perception of their teaching abilities (Han, 2021). However, the combined impact of various teaching strategies on both student engagement and teachers’ self-concept remains unclear. These strategies are particularly vital in motivating learners and increasing engagement, especially among children with special needs. Approaches such as differentiated instruction, the use of visual aids, and interactive activities are creative methods that can capture students' attention and address their diverse learning needs. By making lessons more relatable and accessible, these strategies can significantly enhance students’ motivation to actively participate in their education. The goal of this study was to explore the teachers’ creative teaching strategies, learners’ motivation to learn, and learning engagement among children with special needs in selected schools in Cavite. Further, this study will explain the relationship between the variables covered and will serve as a basis for an action plan to enhance teachers’ creative teaching strategies, learners’ motivation to learn, and learning engagement among children with special needs. The findings revealed that the overall weighted mean of 3.44, with a verbal interpretation of "Strongly Agree," indicates a consistent and high level of agreement among respondents regarding teachers’ creative teaching strategies. Meanwhile, the overall weighted mean of 2.93, interpreted as "Agree," suggests that learners are moderately motivated, primarily driven by external incentives rather than a genuine passion for learning. Notably, intrinsic motivation scored 2.46, while extrinsic motivation was higher at 2.93, emphasizing the need to strengthen learners' internal drive to learn. Furthermore, the overall weighted mean of 3.19, interpreted as "High," indicates that, in general, children demonstrate a solid level of engagement in learning activities. It was concluded that creative teaching strategies are highly regarded by teachers for their ability to foster a dynamic and inclusive learning environment, which significantly enhances student engagement and overall success. Moreover, the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation highlights the need to cultivate a deeper, self-sustained interest in learning to promote authentic and enduring student engagement. Children's strong engagement in learning activities reflects a positive response to the learning environment, providing a solid foundation for sustained interest and active participation. However, while creative teaching strategies contribute to a positive learning environment, they do not have a statistically significant relationship with learners’ intrinsic or extrinsic motivation to learn. On the other hand, there is a significant relationship between creative teaching strategies and learning engagement among children with special needs. Lastly, it was found that the level of learning engagement does not depend on learners’ motivation to learn, whether intrinsic or extrinsic.
Othman, A., & Ruslan, N. (2020). Intercultural communication experiences among students and teachers: implication to in-service teacher professional development. Journal for Multicultural Education, 14(3/4), 223-238.
Papageorge, N. W., Gershenson, S., & Kang, K. M. (2020). Teacher expectations matter. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(2), 234-251.
Randel, K. N., Ryan, J. B., Walters, E., & Morash-MacNeil, V. (2019). Employment and independent living outcomes of a mixed model post-secondary education program for young adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 50(1), 61-72.
Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2021). Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-17.
Rinne, L. F., Ye, A., & Jordan, N. C. (2020). Development of arithmetic fluency: A direct effect of reading fluency?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 110.
ROXAS, I. M. A., AGUSTIN, M. B., & VALLEJO, O. T. (2019). Assessment of Special Education Program in The Division of Aurora, Philippines. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 9(3), p8771.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ruijs, N., de Croes, L., Cornelisz, I., van Klaveren, C. (2019). The effect of students with special needs on their peers' cognitive outcomes: Results from student-level population data in The Netherlands. Education Finance and Policy, 1-63.
Salend, Q., & Qu, X. (2022). A critical realist model of inclusive education for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 1008-1022.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Reyes-Martínez, I. (2019). High school prospective teachers’ problem-solving reasoning that involves the coordinated use of digital technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 182-201.
Şener, B., Ertem, İ. S., & Meç, A. (2020). Online teaching experiences of ELT instructors. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(3), 340-362.
Seliami, G., & Stathopoulou, M. (2021). Teaching English to deaf/hard of hearing students in primary education: A suggested methodology. In Language Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 112-120.
Setiawan, E., Jumareng, H., Asmuddin, A., Rahadian, A., & Gazali, N. (2022). Online learning for children with disabilities during the COVID-19: Investigating parents' perceptions. Online Learning, 2, 27-2022.
Silmser and Bonawitz, (2022). The Influence of Restorative Practice on School Climate.
Sturm, A., Maaser, C., Vavricka, S. R., Kucharzik, T., Fiorino, G., Annese, V., ... & European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology [ESGAR]. (2019). ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 13(2), 144-164K.
Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and Pedagogical Models. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1-14.
Takriyanti, R., Sulistiyo, U., Sartika, D., Hamdan, H., & Chaniago, F. (2022). Teachers’ strategies in teaching English to students with special needs. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(2), 437-449.
Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28.
Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1).
Tomlinson and Moon, Musasa, A. (2024). In Pursuit of Equal Access to Quality Education: A Guide to the Implementation of Differentiated Teaching for Diverse Minds. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3), 119-130.
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge?. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401-6419.
Uzunboylu, H., & Özcan, D. (2019). Teaching methods used in special education: A content analysis study. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 7(2), 99-108.
Vail Dean, E. E., Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Almire, B., & Mellenbruch, R. (2019). Career design and development for adults with intellectual disability: A program evaluation. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3, 111-118.
Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and metareview. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 675-689.
Watkins Thacker, S., Adshead, D., Fay, M., Hallegatte, S., Harvey, M., Meller, H., ... & Hall, J. W. (2019). Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 324-331.
Wigfield, Cambria, Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., & Nevo, E. (2021). Reading fluency and reading motivation in Hebrew in students with reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(2), 110-120.
Wing, S., Grant, S., Leverett, P., D'Costa, S., Amie, K. A., & Campbell, S. M. (2022). Decolonizing school psychology research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Social Issues, 78(2), 346-365.
Wood, C. L., Muharib, R., Alzrayer, N. M., Wood, C. L., & Voggt, A. P. (2019). Backward chaining and speech-output technologies to enhance functional communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(4), 251-262.
Yen, A. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching for Asian learners: A micro-ethnographic case study of ELA Teachers Within a School Culture. St. John's University (New York).
Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2020). ESG factor integration into private equity. Sustainability, 12 (14), 5725.
Zulkifli, H., Rashid, S. M. M., Mohamed, S., Toran, H., Raus, N. M., & Suratman, M. N. (2022). Challenges and Elements Needed for Children with Learning Disabilities in Teaching and Learning the Quran. Children, 9(10), 1469.
Zuurmond, M., Banks, L. M., Hunt, X., Kalua, K., Nindi, P., Zuurmond, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2022). 'I might be lucky and go back to school': Factors affecting inclusion in education for children with disabilities in rural Malawi. African Journal of Disability (Online), 11, 1-12.