Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 12 no. 2 Part 2 (2024)

Tolerance of Ambiguity, Reading Strategies and Ability of Chinese College Non-English Majors

Liu Xin | Beverly T. Caiga

Discipline: English Language

 

Abstract:

This study assessed the level of tolerance of ambiguity of non-English majors to cope with complex, incomplete, uncertain, and unknown context in English reading, which significantly influenced their reading strategies and ability. The study employed a quantitative research method, and three survey questionnaires were used to identify tolerance of ambiguity, reading strategies and ability of 400 non-English major students from HUAT majoring in automotive engineering and in economics and management. The findings revealed a significant correlation between high tolerance of ambiguity and the use of effective reading strategies, such as prediction, inference, and summarization. Students with higher tolerance levels were found to be more adept at navigating ambiguous texts and extracting meaning from complex English materials. Moreover, these students demonstrated superior reading comprehension skills compared to their peers with lower tolerance levels. The study concluded that fostering tolerance of ambiguity should be an integral part of English language teaching for non-English majors. Teachers were encouraged to incorporate activities that enhanced students’ ability to handle ambiguity, thereby improving their reading strategies and overall English reading ability. This research contributed to the field of second language acquisition by providing empirical evidence of the role of tolerance of ambiguity in English reading ability among non-English major students in Chinese colleges. Based on the findings, an enhancement program was proposed to help Chinese non-English majors deal with reading ambiguity, help them better use in reading strategies and promote their reading ability in EFL reading learning.



References:

  1. Arquero, J. L., Fernández-Polvillo, C., Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (2017). Relationships between communication apprehension, ambiguity tolerance and learning styles in accounting students. Revista De Contabilidad, 20(1), 13–24.
  2. Başöz, T. (2015). Exploring the relationship between tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners and their vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 53-66.
  3. Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language learning, 36(1), 27-45.
  4. Chen H. (2021). A Correlative Study on Junior High School Students’ Perceptual Learning Styles, Reading Strategies and Reading Performance. 2021, Chongqing Normal University, China, p50-52.
  5. Chen, C., & Williams, H. (2021). Effects of Ambiguity Tolerance Levels on Foreign Reading Strategies and Performance.
  6. Chen, X. (2024). The Analysis of the Influence of Ambiguity Tolerance on the Understanding and Inspiration of English Reading. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 6(6), 9-13.
  7. Deng Y. (2023). A Study on the Correlation Between Vocabulary Knowledge Breadth, Reading Ambiguity Tolerance and English Reading Achievement of Senior High School Students. 2023, Minnan Normal University, China, p50-52.
  8. Ely, C. M. (1989). Tolerance of ambiguity and use of second language strategies, Foreign Language Annals, 22(5), 437-445.
  9. Ely, C. M. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity and the teaching of ESL. In Reid, J. M. (ed.). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  10. He M. (2022). A Study on the Effects of Senior High School Students’ Reading Ambiguity Tolerance and Reading Self-efficacy on their English Reading Achievements. 2022, Minnan Normal University, China.
  11. Jiang, Y. (2023). Tolerance of ambiguity, reading strategies and foreign language anxiety in English learning. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 6(16).
  12. Kim, A. Y. (2015). Exploring ways to provide diagnostic feedback with an ESL placement test: Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading ability. Language Testing, 32(2), 227-258.
  13. Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2023). Multimodal discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 139-155). Routledge.
  14. Liu, C. (2015). Relevant researches on tolerance of ambiguity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(9), 1874.
  15. Mu X. (2020). A Study on the Correlation between 9th Grade Students Tolerance of English Reading Ambiguity and Reading Strategies. 2020, Minnan Normal University, China, p47-48.
  16. Norton, R. W. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of personality assessment, 39(6), 607-619.
  17. Oxford RL. Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching. 2011;44(2):167-180.
  18. Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading, 14(2), 314-336.
  19. Tezcan, S., & Deneme, S. (2016). A study on language learning strategy use of young Turkish learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 42.
  20. Zeng, Y., & Fan, T. (2017). Developing reading proficiency scales for EFL learners in China. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1).
  21. Zheng, R. (2023). Chinese University Students’ English Reading Strategies: An analysis of the current situation and a Proposal for enhancement. Pacific International Journal, 6(2), 226–231.
  22. Zhou J. (2022), A Study on Development of Business English Reading Proficiency Scale from the Perspective of Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. 2022, Sichuan International Studies University, China, p80-81.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic