Analysis of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 Concerning Guidelines for The Criminalization of Corruption Crimes in the Perspective of Justice
Yoga Wiranata Yoga | M Ruhly Kesuma Dinata
Discipline: Social Sciences
Abstract:
Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 1 of 2020 was issued as a
guideline for judges in determining the punishment of perpetrators of
corruption crimes. This guideline aims to create legal certainty, proportionality, and consistency in the imposition of criminal sanctions in order to achieve substantive justice. This study analyzes the extent to
which the application of the Perma has reflected the principle of justice,
both from the perspective of criminal law and restorative justice. Using
juridical-normative methods and a case comparison approach, this
study finds that the implementation of Perma No. 1 of 2020 still faces
challenges in judicial practice, especially in adjusting to the elements of
state losses and the level of guilt of the defendants. The problem that
will be discussed in this study is how urgent is the evaluation of Perma
No. 1 of 2020 concerning guidelines for criminalizing corruption
crimes from a justice perspective. The research method used is a normative research method with a statute approach, case approach, and
theoretical approach, and analyzed using content analysis.
References:
- Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Lawrence M. Friedman’s modern legal system: Legal culture and societal changes from industrial to digital. Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 84–99.
- Armansyah, A., Alfatih, T. M., & Fadhil, M. A. (2023). Problems and handling of corruption in Indonesia. Scientific Journal of Educational Vehicles, 9(21), 892–910.
- Atmadja, I. D. G. (2018). Legal principles in the legal system. Kertha Wicaksana, 12(2), 145–155.
- Bima, M. R., Kamal, M., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Training and counseling on the management of village fund allocation (ADD). Journal of Innovation as a Result of Community Service (JIPEMAS), 3(1), 63–77.
- DP, S. H. (2018). The implementation of conditional sentences in the penal system in Indonesia. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 4(1), 2–10.
- Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualism of normative & empirical legal research. Student Library.
- Friedman, L. M. (2019). Legal system: A social science perspective. Nusamedia.
- Irmawanti, N. D., & Arief, B. N. (2021). The urgency of criminal goals and guidelines in the context of reforming the criminal law criminal system. Indonesian Journal of Legal Development, 3(2), 217–227.
- Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Legal research. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
- Muallifin, M. D. A. (2015). Problems and eradication of corruption in Indonesia. Ahkam: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 311–325.
- Muhamad, W. M. N., et al. (2023). The problem of asset recovery in corruption crimes in Indonesia. Publisher Adab.
- Muhammad, A. (2004). Law and legal research. Citra Aditya Bakti.
- Nurhardianto, F. (2015). Indonesia’s legal system and legal position. Journal of Filtering: Journal of Islamic Political Aspiration Binoculars, 11(1), 33–44.
- Samosir, C. D. (1992). The function of prison in the penal system in Indonesia. Creation.
- Soetrisno. (1978). Research methodology. UGM.
- Sulaiman, E. (2016). The problem of law enforcement in Indonesia. Ash-Shahabah: Journal of Islamic Education and Studies, 2(1), 63–77.
- Wardani, K. A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). The policy of formulating the death penalty law against the perpetrators of corruption crimes in Indonesia. Khaira Ummah Law Journal, 12(4), 951–958.
- Zulfa, E. A. (2006). The shift in the criminal paradigm in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Development, 36(3), 1–12.
- Compass. (2024, December 31). The National Police is investigating 1,280 corruption cases in 2024, 830 people are suspects. Compass. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/12/31/15530711/polri-mengusut-1280-kasus-korupsi-pada-2024-830-orang-jadi-tersang-ka?utm_source=chatgpt.com#google_vignette
- Metro TV News. (2024, February 14). Throughout 2024, the KPK will handle 93 corruption cases. Metrotvnews. https://www.metrotvnews.com/play/kqYCxaG8-sepanjang-2024-kpk-tangani-93-kasus-korupsi
- Kusuma, N. J., Firganefi, F., & Farid, M. (2021). The Relevance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 in Efforts of State Losses Refund through Restorative Justice. Corruptio, 2(2), 137-146.
- Ali, M., Muliyono, A., & Nurhidayat, S. (2023). The application of a human rights approach toward crimes of corruption: analyzing anti-corruption regulations and judicial decisions. Laws, 12(4), 68.
- Siburian, H. K., Nugroho, E. S. N., Manullang, S. O., & Sipayung, B. (2023). Comparative analysis of corruption criminal regulations between the New Criminal Law and the Corruption Act. Awang Long Law Review, 5(2), 535-544.
- Maggio, P. (2021). A critical analysis of corruption and anti-corruption policies in Italy. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 513-530.