Training Success Factors in The Coast Guard Special Operations Course

Ramil  R. Cadalso,

Training Success Factors in The Coast Guard Special Operations Course

Abstract:

The Coast Guard Special Operations Course has experienced a 33% dropout rate in its training program from 2018 to 2024, highlighting the need to identify the underlying factors contributing to trainee success or failure. This mixed-methods study utilized a concurrent triangulation design to examine these factors comprehensively. Quantitative data were collected from 243 respondents who successfully completed the CGSOC training from 2018 until August 2024. The analysis, conducted using Exploratory Factor Analysis, revealed five key dimensions influ-encing training success: Career Advancement and Personal Motivation, Training Environment and Support, Training Facility and Resource Ad-equacy, Family Support and Guidance, and Family Concerns and Peer Support. Concurrently, qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with five participants who did not complete the training, providing additional context and a deeper understanding of the chal-lenges trainees face. The study found that trainees’ intrinsic motivation, a supportive training environment, and robust family and peer support are crucial for their success. Conversely, challenges such as homesick-ness, financial difficulties, and inadequate preparation were identified as major obstacles contributing to attrition. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to optimize training retention and outcomes. The results suggest that fostering mentorship and peer sup-port systems could mitigate the negative impacts of these challenges, thereby improving completion rates. Future research may explore the role of structured peer mentorship and family engagement strategies in high-stress law enforcement training environments.

References:

Booth-Kewley, S., Larson, G. E., & Highfill-McRoy, R. M. (2014). Predictors of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans’ Engagement in Mental Health Treatment. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-01-2708
Bumbuc, S. (2021). Considerations Regarding the Quality of Military Training Programs. International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2021-0057
Cohen, S., & Garth, M. (2016). Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis. Semantic Scholar. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1201/9781003044307-10
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/discovering-statistics-using-ibm-spss-statistics/book285130
Halson, S. L. (2014). Monitoring Training Load to Understand Fatigue in Athletes. Sports Med., 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z
Kelty, R., & Segal, D. R. (2018). The Military as a Transforming Influence Integration into or Isolation from Normal Adult Roles? taylorfrancis. https://doi.org/9780203079744
O’Neal, C. W., & Lavner, J. A. (2021). Military-Related Stress and Family Well-Being. Interdisciplinary Journal Applied Family Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12561
Osborne, J. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessmen, Research & Evaluation. Rose, A. S. (2020). Cultural adaptation and training outcomes: A meta-analysis of expatriate effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development, 135-150.
Sahoo, M., & Mishra, S. (2018). Effects of trainee characteristics, training attitudes and training need analysis on motivation to transfer training. researchgate. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0089
Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss3/19/
United States Naval Institute, U. (2022). Recruiting Requires Bold Changes. USNI.
Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Fiorella , L., & Malone, N. (2018). Instructional strategies framework for military training systems. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.038