HomeWorld Education Connect Multidisciplinary E-Publicationvol. 4 no. 4 (2024)

Development And Validation Of An Interactive Material In Science 7

Aleah G. Sabado | Rita E. Pulmano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study focused on developing and validating an Interactive Material for Grade 7 Students to improve students’ learning achievements such as process skills, content knowledge, problem-solving, and learning outcomes. The researcher used research and development design in developing the Interactive Material while the Department of Education’s LRMDS Evaluation Tool for Non-Print Materials was utilized to determine the validity of the interactive material in terms of content quality, instructional quality, technical quality, and errors wherein the evaluators were Science and IT experts. After the evaluation, the 52 Grade 7 participants utilized the developed Interactive material and validated its effectiveness based on their pretest and posttest results.



References:

  1. Bucholska, R. A. (2019). eLearning design and development – Interactive learning materials for engagement. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/interactive-learning-materials-engagement/amp
  2. Essiam, C., Osei-Antwi, D., & Quayson, C. (2023). Are chemistry topics difficult to learn? The stance of high school students. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 12(2), 112–121. http://www.ijtase.net/index.php/ijtase/article/view/369
  3. McGreal, R. (2017). Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality education challenges and opportunities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/download/3541/4433
  4. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (Eds.). (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://timss2019.org/reports/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf
  5. Njeri, M. (2022). Principal's perception of factors contributing to students' poor performance in chemistry in public secondary schools in Wajir County, Kenya. Journal of Chemistry, 1(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.47672/jchem.1099
  6. Sinaga, P., Setiawan, W., & Mey, L. (2022). Impact of electronic interactive teaching materials (EITMs) in e-learning on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Teaching and Teacher Education: Leadership and Professional Development, 101, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101066
  7. Surfshark. (2020). Digital quality of life index. https://surfshark.com/dql2020
  8. Caduceus International Publishing. (2022, June 27). Why science is hard to learn? https://www.cipcourses.com/blog/why-is-science-so-hard-to-learn/
  9. Susanti, W. (2021). The effectiveness of websites as mathematics learning media during the online learning period. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 122–137. https://onlinejournal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/12225/10937
  10. Sutton, S. (2020). Adapting science lessons for distance learning. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/adapting-science-lessons-distance-learning
  11. Walsh, A. (2014). SEEK!: Creating and crowdfunding a game-based open educational resource to improve information literacy. Insights, 27(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.148
  12. Winstead, S. (2023). 7 advantages of using PowerPoint for eLearning and online education. My eLearning World. https://myelearningworld.com/powerpoint-for-e-learning-7-benefits-you-may-have-never-considered/