Home⇛Universal Journal of Educational Research⇛vol. 4 no. 2 (2025)

“Oh, No, That Is Too Controversial!” Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of Controversial Issues: A Case Study

Shouqing Si

 

Abstract:

Classroom discussion and deliberation of controversial public and social issues greatly contribute to democratic education; however, pre-service teachers in social studies have been poorly prepared in teaching in this area. This qualitative case study collects multiple sources of data (i.e., interviews, self-reflection, and observation) from 13 participants and autoethnography, exploring pre-service elementary social studies teachers’ perceptions of deliberating controversial issues. Two research questions are targeted: 1) What is pre-service teachers’ rationale for teaching controversial issues? 2) What issues are considered controversial by pre-service social studies teachers in the classroom? Constant comparative data analysis reveals that inconsistency and confusion over defining controversy prevails while everyone holds a sound rationale for teaching controversial issues. A number of controversial issues are reported. Teacher educators must continue to devote efforts to developing student teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and skills in incorporating controversies in the K-12 classroom. The goal of incorporating controversies is not to avoid discomfort, but to guide young citizens through it with integrity and poise.



References:

  1. Levinson, R. (2008). Promoting the role of the personal narrative in reaching controversial socioscientific issues. Science and Education, 17, 855–871.
  2. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
  3. Malikow, M. (2006). Engaging students in controversial issues. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(3), 106-108.
  4. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.
  5. Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  6. Marx, S., Lavigne, A. L., Braden, S., Hawkman, A., Andersen, J., Gailey, Si, S … Washburn, K. (2023). “I didn’t quit. The system quit me.” Examining why teachers of color leave teaching. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2218113
  7. McBee, R. H. (1997). Can controversial topics be taught in early grades? The answer is yes! In M. E. Hass, & M. A. Laughlin (Eds.), Meeting the standards: Social studies readings for K-6 educators (pp. 158-162). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies
  8. Meadows, L. M., & Morse, J. M. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J. M. Morse, J. M. Swansen, & A. Kuzel (Eds.), Nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 187–200). Sage.
  9. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
  10. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & SaldanĖƒa, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
  11. Misco, T. (2011). Teaching about controversial issues: Rationale, practice, and need for inquiry. International Journal for Education Law and Policy, 7, 13–24.
  12. Misco, T., & Patterson, N. (2007). A study of preservice teachers' conceptualization of academic freedom and controversial issues. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(3), 520-550.
  13. Misco, T., & Tseng, J. (2018). “I will not mention controversial issues unless they are in the textbook”: An exploration of curriculum instructional gatekeeping in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 42(1), 1-10.
  14. Montgomery, A., & McGlynn, C. (2009). New peace, new teachers: Student teachers’ perspectives of diversity and community relations in Northern Ireland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 391–399. https://doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.002
  15. National Council for Social Studies (NCSS) (2016). Academic freedom and the social studies educator. Social Education, 80(3), 186. Retrieved from  https://www.socialstudies.org/publications/socialeducation/may-june2016/academic-freedom-and-social-studies-teacher
  16. Nganga, L., Roberts, A., Kambutu, J., & James, J. (2020). Examining pre-service teachers’ preparedness and perceptions about teaching controversial issues in social studies. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 77–90. https://doi-org.dist.lib.usu.edu/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.08.001
  17. Ochoa-Becker, A. S. (2007). Democratic education for social studies: An issues-centered decision making curriculum. Information Age.
  18. Oliver, D., & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. The Social Studies, 83(3).
  19. Ollila, J., & Macy, M. (2019). Social studies curriculum integration in elementary classrooms: A case study on a Pennsylvania Rural School. Journal of Social Studies Research, 43(1), 33-45.
  20. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072746
  21. Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
  22. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
  23. Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  24. Parker, W. C. (2006). Public Discourses in Schools: Purposes, Problems, Possibilities. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 11–18.
  25. Parker, W. C. (2010). Listening to strangers: Classroom discussion in democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112(11), 2815-2832.
  26. Philpott, S., Clabough, J., McConkey, L., & Turner, T. (2011). Controversial issues: To teach or not to teach? That is the question. The Georgia Social Studies Journal, 1(1), 32-44.
  27. Sant, E. (2019). Democratic education: A theoretical review. Review of Educational Research, Online, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493
  28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  29. Thorndike, R. L., & Stein, S. (1937). An evaluation of the attempts to measure social intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 34(5), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053850
  30. Woolley, R. (2011). Controversial issues: Identifying the concerns and priorities of student teachers. Policy Futures in Education, 9, 280-291. https://doi:10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.280
  31. Yacek, D. (2018). Thinking controversially: The psychological condition for teaching controversial issues. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12282
  32. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic