HomeUniversal Journal of Educational Researchvol. 4 no. 2 (2025)

How Much Do Educators Teach – How Much Do Students Learn in Language and Literature Classes

Volkan Mutlu

 

Abstract:

Assessment is one of the crucial elements of language education because of its effects on the decisions taken at the end of the learning process. This makes it necessary to study it from various perspectives, one of which is the correctness of the results. By taking into this account, this study investigates the permanence of students’ acquisition, addressing a critical issue in educational assessment: the retention of material over time. Employing a time series version of the within-group experimental design, the study used 82 students selected through random and convenience sampling methods. These students took three different tests: a pre-test to measure initial knowledge, a formal final exam to grasp their knowledge after the instruction and understand whether they studied or not, and a subsequent test administered 20 days after the final exam. The findings reveal a substantial decline in retained knowledge, with students forgetting approximately half of the learned material. Additionally, while the type of questions used in the tests did not alter the overall results, it influenced the rate at which students forgot the material. This study underscores the need for more effective teaching or assessing strategies that promote long-term learning, especially when teaching theoretical knowledge.



References:

  1. Abahrizka, K., Widodo, J. Handoyo, E., & Masyhar, A. (2021). Performance of educational assessments: Integrated assessment as an assessment innovation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 2708-2718.
  2. Arnold, T. (2002). Reliability and validity in assuring quality for prior learning assessment. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 50(2), 64-68. DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2002.10846688.
  3. Assessment Council of Europe (2001). Common european framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge.
  4. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A. & van der Vleuten, P.M. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 153-170. doi: 10.1016(i.stueduc.2006.04.006)
  5. Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment. Newbury House Teacher Development.
  6. Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles an integrative approach to language pedagogy(2nd ed.). Longman Pearson.
  7. Buldu, E. & Öneren Şendil, Ç. (2023). A critical point about early childhood assessments: Validity and reliability issues in teachers’ formative assessment. Journal of Education for Life, 37(1), 253-268. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2023371507.
  8. Carroll, V. A., Castro, E. R., DeFranco, K. M., Fazio, R. M., Williams, L. L. & Barton, R. A. (2002). Test –retest reliability of a student self-assessment of professional behaviors. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16(2-3), 1-19. DOI:10.1080/J003v16n02_01.
  9. Chamberlain, S. (2013). Qualifications users’ perceptions and experiences of assessment reliability. Research Papers in Education, 28(1), 118-133. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2012.754231
  10. Clayson, D. E. (2017). Student evaluation of teaching matters of reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 666-681. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1393495.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  12. Daniels, V. I. (1999). The assessment maze: Making decisions about alternative assessments for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 43(4), 171-178. DOI: 10.1080/10459889909604994.
  13. Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 13-19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101956.pdf.
  14. Dobric, N. (2018). Reliability, validity, and writing assessment: A timeline. ELOPE, 15(2), 9-24. revije.ff.uni-lj.si/elope
  15. Edge, J. (1993). Essentials of English language teaching. Longman.
  16. Faxon-Mills, S., Hamilton, L. S., Rudnick, M. & Stecher, B. M. (2013). New Assessments, Better Instruction? Designing Assessment Systems to Promote Instructional Improvement. A report by the RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR354.html
  17. Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
  18. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Pearson
  19. Guetterman, T. C. & Salamoura A. (2016). Enhancing test validation through rigorous mixed methods components. In Aleidine J Moeller, John W Crewell & Nick Saville (eds.), Second language assessment and mixed methods research. (pp. 153-176).  Cambridge University Press.
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  21. Hinett, K. & Knight, P. (1996). Quality and assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(3), 3-10. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684889610125832/full/html
  22. Huang, J., Zhu, D., Xie, D. & Shu,T. (2023). Examining the reliability of an international Chinese proficiency standardized writing assessment: Implications for assessment policy makers. Assessing Writing, 55, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100693.
  23. Koslowski, F. A. (2006). Quality and assessment in context: A brief review. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 277-278. www.emeraldinsight.com/0968-4883.htm.
  24. Köksal, D. & Ulum, Ö. G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 76-88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328416109_Language_assessment_through_Bloom%27s_Taxonomy.
  25. Mavrommatis, Y. (1997). Understanding assessment in the classroom: Phases of the assessment process – the assessment episode. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 381-400. Doi:10.1080/0969594970040305.
  26. McConlogue, T. (2020). Assessment and feedback in higher education. UCL Press.
  27. McGee, J. & Colby, S. (2014). Impact of an Assessment Course on Teacher Candidates’ Assessment Literacy. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5-6), 522-532. DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2014.977753
  28. Meeus, W., Van Petegem, P. & Engels, N. (2009). Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment in pre-service teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 401-413. DOI: 10.1080/02602930802062659
  29. O’Malley, J. M. & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners. Longman
  30. Pereira, D., Flores, A. & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: A review of research in assessment and evaluation in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), pp.1008-1032. https://repositorium.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/45343/1/Pereira%2C%20Flores%20e%20Niklasson.pdf
  31. Pippitt, K. A., Moore, K. B. Lindsley, J. E., Cariello, P. F., Smith, A. G., Formosa, T. Moser, K., Morton, D. A., Colbert-Getz, J. M. & Chow, C. J. (2022). Assessment for learning with ungraded and graded assessments. Medical Science Educator, 32, 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01612-y.
  32. Rockman, I. F. (2002). The importance of assessment. Reference Services, 30(3), 181-182. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0090-7324.htm
  33. Rosman, T., Mayer, A., & Krampen, G. (2014). Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: Empirical results and recommendations for practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 740-754. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.950554
  34. Soto, E. (1994). When teaching becomes learning: A theory and practice of teaching. Continuum.
  35. Şentürk, C. & Baş, G. (2023). Classroom assessment beliefs of teachers: Scale validity and reliability study. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22, 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09339-2.
  36. Taras, M. (2002). Using assessments for learning from assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 501-510. DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000020273.
  37. Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: The missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 57-69. DOI: 10.1080/03098770802638671.
  38. Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323-342. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
  39. Vries, J., Gasse, R. V. Geel, A. V., Visscher, A. & Petegem, P. V. (2024). Profile of teachers’ assessment techniques and their students’ involvement in assessment. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2), 369-388. Doi:10.1080/02619768.2024.2354410.
  40. Western, V. S. (2010). Comparing classroom assessments to district assessments to analyze assessment guided instruction effectiveness. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc94291/m2/1/high_res_d/vanessa-western-072710-Final.pdf.
  41. Zhang, Z. & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom Assessment Practices and Teachers' Self-Perceived Assessment Skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4.