Philippine E-Journals

References:

1. Abaido, G.M. (2020) Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25:1, 407-420, DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1669059
2. Akkaya, A. (2019). The effects of activities developed with web 2.0 tools on computer hardware on student achievement. Master’s Thesis. Balıkesir University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Balikesir Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
3. Akman, Y. & Özdemir, M.(2019). Examining the relations between Organisational Attraction, organizational Image and Organisational Loyalty: An Investigation with Teachers. Scholarly Journal 44 No 198 1-16.
4. Alashwal, M.(2019). “Faculty Perceptions and Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Saudi Arabian Higher Education”. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6310. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6310
5. Alghamdi, M. & Alzahrani, A.(2020). Enhancing education supervision in Saudi Arabia-towards eSupervision.Educational Futures 7(3). https://educationstudies.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BESA-Journal-EF-7-3-4-Alghamdi.pdf
6. Alharbi S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
7. Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., & Allhibi, H. (2019). Utilization of Learning Management System (LMSs) in higher education system: A case review for Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia 160(2019) 731-737.
8. Almekhlafi, A.G. and Abulibdeh, E.S.A. (2018), “K-12 teachers’ perceptions of Web 2.0 applications in the United Arab Emirates?”, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 238-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2017-0060
9. Al-Rahmi W, & Zeki, A. M. (2018). A model of using social media for collaborative learning to enhance learners’ performance on learning. Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences, 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002.
10. Arabaci, I.B., & Akilli, C. (2021). English Teachers’ Views on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Educational Environments. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(2):115-125.
11. Balbay, S. & Erkan, G. (2018). Perceptions of Instructors on using Web 2.0 tools in Academic English Courses. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 10 (2) (2018) 45-60.
12. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Rev. 1977; 84 (2): 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191.
13. Barni, D., Danioni, F., Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role ofpersonal values and motivations for teaching. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1645. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645
14. Bello, L. K., Ojebisi, A. O., Adebanjo, A. A. (2021). The Impact of Perceived Relevance an Technology Anxiety on Readiness to Use
15. Digital Storytelling. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development 4(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEPD.2021070106
16. Birisci, S., & Kul, U. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93. doi: 10.30935/cet.512537
17. Bonafini, F.C. (2018). Characterizing Super-Posters in a MOOC for Teachers’ Professional Development. Online Learning. DOI:10.24059/OLJ.V2214.1503
18. Bouchrika, I. (2023). Digital Storytelling: Benefits, Examples, Tools & Tips. https://research.com/education/digitalstorytelling#:~:text=Digital%20stories%20allow%20teachers%20to,of%20acting%20or%20thinking%20differently.
19. Camas, L., Valero, A., & Vendrell, M. (2021). The Teacher-Student Relationship in the Use of Social Network Sites for Educational Purposes: A Systematic Review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 137-156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.591
20. Chen, H-L, Chuang, Y-C.(2020).The effects of digital storytelling games on high school students’ critical thinking skills. J Comput Assist Learn, 37: 265– 274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12487
21. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018- 9633-7.
22. Choo, L.M., Tuan Soh, T.M., Mansor, A. Z. (2020). Web 2.0 in Secondary Science Instruction: Assessing Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Integration Level and the Relationship between Them. http://www.recsam.edu.my/sub_lsmjournal.
23. Cherry, K. (2022, September 7). Self-efficacy and Why Believing in Yourself Matters, from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-efficacy-2795954
24. Dennis, M. A. (2019, June 7). Blog. Encyclopedia Britannica https://www.britannica.com/topic/blog.DO 35, s. 2016-The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program School-Based Continuing Professional Development Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning I Department of Education, (2016, June 7). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2016/06/07/do-35-s-2016-the-learning-action-cell-as-a-k-to-12-basic-education-program-school-based-continuing-professional-development-
25. Dodson, Hilary Elizabeth (2020). “A Phenomenological Study of North Carolina Elementary Teachers’ Lived Experiences with Google Classroom Integration”. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 2402. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2402
26. Drent, M. & Meelissen, M. (2020). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers and Education. 551(1), 187-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001
27. Ergul Sonmez, E., & Cakir, H. (2021). Effect of Web 2.0 technologies on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.161
28. Faizi, R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions towards using web 2.0 in language learning and teaching. Education and Information
29. Technologies, 23(3), 1219-1230. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1007/s10639-017-9661-7 117 Florida Department of Education (2014). District digital classroom plan. Retrieved from www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/5658/urlt/0109080-manatee.pdf
30. Fearnley, M.R. & Amora, J.T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1265695.pdf
31. Gokbel, E. N. (2020). The Effects of Teacher Professional Development and Self-Efficacy on Classroom Uses of Information and Computer Technologies (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1881
32. Halim, Mohd & Hashim, Harwati. (2019). Integrating web 2.0 technology in ESL classroom: A review on the benefits and barriers.Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology. 2. 10.32698/0381.
33. Harrell, S. & Bynum, Y. (2018). Technology integration in the classroom. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, v5 p12-18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1194723.
34. Hassan, M. U. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: Effective indicator towards students’ success in medium of education perspective. Problems of Education in the 21^st Century, 77(5), 667- 679. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.33225/pec/19.77.667
35. Hensley, J.D. (2019). Teachers’ self-reported levels of confidence regarding the impact of Web 2.0 tools in high school classrooms to enhance teaching, improve learning, and increase productivity. Tennessee State University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2019. 27546953. https://www.proquest.com/openview/905849863d8e4e118db075c923fe6756/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
36. Javaeed, A., Kibria, Z., Khan, Z., & Ghauri, S. K. (2020). Impact of social media integration in teaching methods on exam outcomes. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, (11), 53–61.
37. Jena, A.K., Bhattacharjee, S., Devi, J., & Barman, M. (2020). Effects of Web 2.0 technology assisted Slideshare, YouTube and WhatsApp on individual and collaborative learning performance and retention in tissues system. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 8(1), 25-36.
38. Jena, A.K., Bhattacharjee, S., Gupta, S., Das,J., & Debnath, R. (2018). Exploring the effects of Web 2.0 Technology on individual and collaborative learning performance in relation to self-regulation of learner. I manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology,3(4), 20-35.
39. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506?seq=1
40. Kenton. W., Mansa, J. & Jackson, A. (2022, September 15). What is Social Networking? Investopedia.com/terms/s/social-networking.asp
41. Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2018). Examining factors affecting teachers’ integration of ICT in classroom settings: An analysis of teachers’self-efficacy, attitutdes, and pedagogical practices. Educational Technology Research and Development. 66(4), 931-951.
42. Kimmons, R., Graham, C., & West, R. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1).
43. Kılıç, T. & Bayır, E. (2020). An Investigation on Internet of Things Technology (IoT) In Smart Houses . International Journal of Engineering Research and Development , 2017 Özel Sayısı , 196-207 . DOI: 10.29137/umagd.349107
44. Knight, V. & Robinson, S. (2019). An Introduction: Establishing a Context for Critical Thinking in Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Critical Thinking and Teacher Education Pedagogy. IGI Global Publisher of Timely Knowledge. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225- 7829-1.ch001.
45. Kolan, B. J. & Dzandza, P. E. (2018). “Effect of Social Media on AcademicPerformance of Students in Ghanaian Universities: A Case Study of University of Ghana, Legon.” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1637. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1637
46. Korucu-Kis, S., & Ozmen, K. S. (2019). Exherent and inherent value beliefs abouttechnology: Missing pieces in the puzzle of technology integration? International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 1-11.
47. Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy matters: exploring the integration of mobile computing device in middle schools. TechTrends, 63(6), 682–692. doiorg.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5
48. Langevin, S. (2018). Google Classroom: Simplify communication, collaboration, and document sharing. Common Sense Education. Retrieved from https://www.commonsense.org/education/website/google-classroom
49. Larrazabal-Mira, Y., & Martinez-Lopez, M. (2017). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their integration of ICT in teaching: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 115-132. Learning and Educational Center. (2019, September 6). Benefits of Blogging in Education. NSUFlorida. https://www.nova.edu/lec/This-Week-in-the-LEC/2019/August/Benefits%20of%20Blogging%20in%20Education.html
50. Leh, F.C., Anduroh, A., Huda, M. (2021). Level of knowledge, skills and of trainee teachers on Web 2.0 applications in teaching geography in Malaysia schools. Science Direct, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08568
51. Lim, P. R., & Md Noor, N. (2019). Digital Storytelling as a Creative Teaching Method in Promoting Secondary School Students’ Writing Skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(07), pp. 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10798
52. Lin, J.-W., Tsai, C.-W., Hsu, C.-C., & Chang, L.-C. (2021). Peer assessment with group awareness tools and effects on project-base learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1593198
53. Marín-Díaz, V., Riquelme, I., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2020). Uses of ICT Tools ffrom the Perspective of Chilean University Teachers. Sustainability, 12(15), 6134. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12156134
54. Mohammad-Salehi, B., Vaez-Dalili, M., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2021). Investigating factors that Influence EFL Teachers’ Adoption of
55. Web 2.0 Technologies: Evidence from Applying the UTAUT and TPACK. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 25(1). https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej97/a21.pdf
56. Onbasili, U. I. (2020). The effects of science teaching practice supported with Web 2.0 tools on prospective elementary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.7
57. Oseni, K. O., Dingley, K., & Hart, P. (2018). Instant Messaging and Social Networks-The Advantages in Online Research Methodology. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1). Pan, S.-C. (2010). The Relationship between Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and the Integration of Web 2.0 Tools in K-12 [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1281726657.
58. Republic Act No. 10533 | GOVPH. (2013, May 15). Republic Act No. 10533 | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
59. Robin, B., & McNeil, S. (2019). Digital Storytelling. Wiley online Library https://doi.org/10/1002/971118978238.iem10056.
60. Rowe, E., (2021, November 18). Web 2.0 Tools for Education, from https://study.com/academy/lesson/web-20-tools-foreducation.html.
61. Udoagwu, K. (2022, April 28). What is an Action Plan? (With Example and Template). Wrike https://www.wrike.com/blog/what-is-an-action-plan-with-example/#Action-plan-definition
62. Ursu, A. S., Panisoara, I. O., & Chirca, R. C. (2021). The changes brought by Digital Technology to Cognitive Learning. Handbook of Research on User Experience in Web 2.0 Technologies and Its Impact on Universities and Businesses. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3756- 5.ch010.
63. Valdez, G.F.D., Cayaban, A.R.R., Al-Fayyadh, S. et al. The utilization of social networking sites, their perceived benefits and their potential for improving the study habits of nursing students in five countries. BMC Nurs 19, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912- 020-00447-5
64. Widiaty, I., Achdiani, Y., Kuntadi, I., Mubaroq, S.R., & Zakaria, D. (2018). The 3Ddigital story-telling media on batik learning in vocational high schools. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 306 (2018) 012062 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012062
65. Wu, J., & Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A Systematic Review of Educational Digital Storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, Article ID: 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786.
66. Yildirim, C., & Koçak, S. (2018). Exploring the Relationship between Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Technology Integration Self-Efficacy. Computers & Education, 126, 235-250.
67. Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Yuen, P. K. (2019). Perceptions, interest, and use: Teachers and web 2.0 tools in education.International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 109-123. Video Sharing. (2022, January 23). In Wikipedia https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_sharing.