HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 19 no. 2 (2024)

Output-Based Performance Assessment: The Perspectives of Teachers in Eastern Visayas

Ma. Alith Gomez

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study analyzed the output-based performance assessment of junior high school teachers in Eastern Visayas for the school year 2018-2019. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were applied to measure the variables. The results revealed that the recent output-based performance assessment is often observed in public schools in Region VIII, wherein performance planning and commitment are the most substantial aspects of compliance. In contrast, the weakest aspect is the performance reward and development. As revealed in the attitudinal aspects of the respondents, there is a generally favorable attitude towards the competency-based performance appraisal system for teachers, the student’s appraisal of teacher performance, and other forms of output-based performance assessment. The teachers’ performance, as measured by the IPCRF, and school performance, as measured by the OPCRF, have no significant correlation with the perception-based, attitude-based, and other assumed independent variables. Future research and inquiries on output-based assessment of teacher performance may focus on the perspectives of the higher educational authorities while exploring alternative variables that predict the authentic level of teaching performance and school outcomes.



References:

  1. Abraham, A. (2012). The effectiveness of teachers’ performance appraisal in secondary schools in Kabale Municipality. http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/207381/the-effectiveness-of-teachers-performance-appraisal-in-secondary-schools.
  2. Arnold, J., Cooper, C., & Robertson, I. (1998). Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behavior in the Workplace. 3rd ed. Pearson Education: Prentice Hall. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282270230596096
  3. Bindslev, J. L. (2006). Organizational Theory. Jorgen Laegaard, Mille Bindslev & Ventus Publishing Aps. https://www.e-booksdirectory.com/details.php?ebook=3444
  4. Campbell, K. and Ryan, I. (2012). Attitude towards teacher performance evaluation. Journal of International Educational Research,3(4):54-65.
  5. Crowe, E. (2010). Measuring What Matters: A Stronger Accountability Model for Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED518518
  6. Davis, D. (2008). Is there a problem with adjuncts? www.teachingcollegeenglish.
  7. DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015. Guidelines on the Establishment and Implementation of the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance-management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
  8. Elliott, K. (2015). Teacher performance appraisal: more about performance or development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education,40(9): 12-23. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.490666162557912
  9. Elstad, Eyvind; Lejonberg, Eli & Christophersen, Knut-Andreas (2015). Teaching evaluation as a contested practice: Teacher resistance to teaching evaluation schemes in Norway. Education Inquiry, 6(4): 375- 399. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/edui.v6.2785
  10. Flaniken, F. W. (2009). Performance appraisal systems in higher education: An exploration of Christian institutions.stars.library.ucf.edu /cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4857&context=etd
  11. Gera, S. M. (2013). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SET): An SEM study in higher education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(2): 289-298.
  12. Hammond, L (2010). Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness How Teacher Performance Assessments Can Measure and Improve Teaching.Center for American Progress. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535859
  13. Kelly, M. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Considerations of Ontario Universities.cou.on.ca/.../Academic-Colleagues-Paper-Student-Evaluations-of-Teaching-Effective
  14. Kertesi, G. (2008). The assessment and evaluation of educational institutions, school accountability. Book for the Renewal of Public Hungarian Education. Hungary Ministry of Education.
  15. Kleinhenz, E., & Ingvarson*, L. (2004). Teacher accountability in Australia: Current policies and practices and their relation to the improvement of teaching and learning. Research papers in education, 19(1), 31-49 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0267152032000176963
  16. Learning, W. C. (2011). Martha Henckell. Teaching the Humanities Online: A Practical Guide to the Virtual Classroom, 125.
  17. Lyde, A., Grieshaber, D. and Byrns, G. (2016). Faculty teaching performance: perceptions of a multi-source method for evaluation (MME). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3): 82-94. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1814
  18. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2010). Teacher Evaluation in a New Era of School Improvement. The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 2010 Annual Report. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580902.pdf
  19. National Education Association. (2013). Teacher assessment and evaluation: The National Education Association’s framework for transforming education systems to support effective teaching and improve student learning. http://www.nea.org/home/41858.htm
  20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009), OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment for Improving School Outcomes: Design and Implementation Plan for the Review. OECD, Paris. OLIS Document EDU/EDPC(2009)3/REV1
  21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers, OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/34990905.pdf
  22. Ortega, S. and Dela Cruz, E. (2016). Educators’ attitude towards outcomes-based educational approach in English Second Language learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(8): 597-601.
  23. Pimpa, N (2005). Teacher performance appraisal in Thailand: poison or panacea? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 4(2): 115–127. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10671-005-1547-6.
  24. Saljooghi, B. & Salehi, K. (2016). Developing a teacher evaluation model: The impact of teachers’ attitude toward the Performance Evaluation System (PES) on job satisfaction and organizational commitment with the mediating role of teachers’ sense of efficacy. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 5(5): 200-209.