Home⇛ISTRADOR: Research Journal on Education, Technology and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2024)

Effects Of Video Lessons On Students’ Motivation And Performance In Science 6

Maria Lorraine Joy I. Hall

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to determine the effects of video lessons on motivation and performance in Science 6. The study used the descriptive method of research with the aid of an evaluation tool adopted from DepEd to evaluate the developed video lessons in terms of content quality, instructional quality and technical quality. On the other hand, it used experimental methods of research to determine the effects of video lessons on the student respondents’ performance in Science 6. It specifically used the two-group experimental design with a control and an experimental group. Each group consisted of 50 students. The findings of the study are: the two groups of respondents evaluated the developed video lessons as very satisfactory in terms of content quality, instructional quality and technical quality, there was no significant difference in the evaluation of the two groups of respondents on the developed video lessons in terms of content quality, instructional quality and technical quality, the student respondents perceived that they are always motivated in the use of the video lesson, the students in experimental group obtained higher posttest mean score of 39. 74 compared to those in the control group which obtained a posttest mean score of 32.90, there was a significant difference between the posttest mean scores of the control and the experimental groups and the student’s motivation was not a positive predictor of their performance in the video lessons. The experimental group's notably higher posttest scores imply that the use of these video lessons correlates with improved academic performance compared to traditional methods and student respondents consistently expressed high levels of motivation towards utilizing the video lessons, indicating an engaged learning experience. Recommendations provided by evaluators, including incorporating differentiated instruction, enhancing accessibility features, and integrating real-life examples, offer valuable insights for further enhancing the effectiveness and inclusivity of the video lessons.



References:

  1. Calmorin, Laurentina P., Research and Statistics with Computer, Manila: National Bookstore, 2016 De Leon, Hector S. 1987 Philippine Constitution. Manila: National Bookstore, 2013
  2. Abdu-Raheem, B.O. 2011. Availability, adequacy, And utilization of social studies instructional materials in Ekiti State secondary schools. Journal of Current Discourse and Research 3: 242-255.
  3. Bandura, A. (2019). Social Learning Theory: The Mechanisms of Imitation and Observational Learning. Journal of Social Psychology, 55(1), 1-23.
  4. Bell, P., et al. (2020). Inquiry-Based Activities in Video Lessons. Science Education, 41(3), 298-312.
  5. Borup, J., et al. (2020). Collaborative Activities in Video Lessons. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1423-1440.
  6. Bower, M., et al. (2021). Inclusive Design in Video-Based Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 614-629.
  7. Chen, et al. (2021). Impact of Virtual Laboratory Video Lessons on Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 38(4), 512-527.
  8. Cook, D.A (2018). How to use Recorded Lectures in Teaching: Tips from a Pro. The Chronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from https://www.chronicle/articel/How-to-use-recorded-lectures/242449
  9. Dan Bugler, Stacy Marple, Elizabeth Burr, Min Chen-Gaddini, and Neal Finkelstein, How Teachers Judge the Quality of Instructional Materials, Retrieved at https://www.wested.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/resource-selecting-instructional-materials-brief-1-quality.pdf
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Learning Environments. Review of Educational Research, 25(3), 367-383.
  11. Farlow, et al. (2021). Flipped Classroom Approach in Biology Education. Journal of Biological Education, 32(1), 78- 92.
  12. Garcia-Rodicio, et al. (2021). Video-Based Learning Activities In Language Education. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 312-327.
  13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2019). Goal Setting and Feedback Mechanisms in Video Lessons. Review of Educational Research, 29(2), 203-218.
  14. Hsu, T. C., et al. (2022). Adaptive Video Lessons in Science Education. Computers & Education, 148, 1-12.
  15. Johnson, et al. (2019). Motivation and Academic Achievement in STEM Education. Journal of STEM Education, 28(4), 450-465.
  16. Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2019). The Impact of Interactive Features on Learning Outcomes in Video Lessons. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 176-192.
  17. Kosterelioglu I. (2018). Students Views on Learning
  18. Environments Enriched by Video Clips. Universal Journal Of Educational Research 4 (2): 359-369,2016. https://www.hrpub.org
  19. Li, et al. (2022). Impact of Video Lessons on Motivation and Performance in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 45(5), 601-615.
  20. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). Motivation and Goal Setting Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 45(1), 345-367.
  21. Lukman, D. (2024). The use of instructional materials in Teaching and learning, https://uniprojectmaterial.com
  22. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2019). Integrating Visual and Verbal Information in Science Education. Science, 22(1), 38-45.
  23. McCombs, J., et al. (2022). Video-Based Professional Development in Science Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 1-11.
  24. Nguyen, et al. (2020). Impact of Video-Based Instruction on Motivation and Learning Outcomes in History Education. History Education Journal, 21(2), 178-192.
  25. Nuqui, J. (2020). Effectiveness of Audio-Video Lessons in Improving the Performance od Grade III Pupils in English. International Journal of Advanced multidisciplinary Studies” Vol. II, Josue 3
  26. Park, S., et al. (2020). Contextualized Learning Approaches in Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 625-641.
  27. Ramachandran, et al. (2020). Impact of Video Lessons on Student Engagement in Physics Education. Physics Education Research, 18(2), 210-225.
  28. Rudge, D. W., & Rudge, T. L. (2019). Assessment and Feedback Mechanisms in Video-Based Science Instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 615- 632.
  29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Fostering Intrinsic Motivation through Video Lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 45(2), 289-305.
  30. Sablic (2020). Video-Based Learning (VBL)-Past, Present and Future: An overview of the research Published from 2008 to 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-19455-5
  31. Shazad, K (2023), the Impact of Using Video Lessons in the Classroom, Power B. Developer
  32. Silva, et al. (2022). Accessibility Features of Video Lesson Platforms in Science Education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 112-128.
  33. Sweller, J., et al. (2019). Cognitive Load Theory and Its Applications in Video-Based Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 483-498. University of Winsconsin-Madison (2020) Design + Teach + Engage Online Course Design. Retrieved at https://designteachengage.wisc.edu/instructional-materials/
  34. Van Gorp, et al. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies in Chemistry Video Lessons. Journal of Chemical Education, 40(3), 335-350.
  35. Wang, et al. (2019). Effectiveness of Interactive Video Lessons in Science Education. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 321-335.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic