Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 22 no. 5 (2024)

Teaching Strategies of Grade 3 Teachers in Teaching Literacy among Learners: An Explanatory-Sequential Study

Yvonne Aplacador | Aleson Cawaling | Mariel Mae Atendido | Emmarie Condrillon | John Jay Lim

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study explored the practices of Grade 3 teachers in Cataingan East District, employing an Explanatory-Sequential Study design to identify strategies, assess efficacy, address challenges, and determine support needs. Quantitative analysis scrutinized socio-demographic profiles, teaching strategies, and effectiveness perceptions, while qualitative inquiry through thematic analysis delved into challenges and support mechanisms. Participants included 21 elementary teachers from Cataingan East District, predominantly female, married, and experienced, representing diverse backgrounds. Commonly used strategies such as Vocabulary Instruction and Interactive Read-Aloud were identified, with potential enhancements suggested for areas like Literature Circles. Phonics Instruction emerged as highly effective. Challenges included student reading levels, learning styles, resource scarcity, waning student interest, and parental involvement. Teachers articulated requisites for enhanced literacy instruction, including conducive environments, tutoring support, parental involvement, ongoing training, ample resources, and mentorship opportunities. Recommendations emphasized supporting teacher professional development, fostering collaborative instructional approaches, ensuring sustained support and resource availability, developing targeted interventions, and nurturing a supportive teaching environment. These insights advocated tailored initiatives aimed at empowering Grade 3 teachers, optimizing teaching practices, and addressing systemic challenges in literacy instruction, ultimately fostering student success and promoting holistic educational development.



References:

  1. Abejuela, H. J. M., Akut, K. B., Balane, C. T., & Del Rosario, A. S. C. (2023). Assessment of the Reading Curriculum in Basic  Education in the Philippines Context. International Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 26-45.
  2. Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 87-98.
  3. Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement  indicators and academic achievement. Educational research review, 24, 10-30.
  4. Burke, K. (2023). The philosophy of literary form. Univ of California Press.
  5. Bush, M. A. (2007). Differentiated educational strategies in the elementary art classroom.
  6. Cabalo, J. P., & Cabalo, M. M. (2019). Factors affecting pupils’ reading proficiency in multi-grade classes among rural elementary  schools. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 2(2), 108-124.
  7. Cayubit, R. F. (2012). Vocabulary and reading comprehension as a measure of reading skills of Filipino children. The Assessment  Handbook, 9.
  8. Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A  systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377.
  9. Cimmiyotti, C. B. (2013). Impact of reading ability on academic performance at the primary level.
  10. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics.  In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Routledge.
  11. Davis, M. H., McPartland, J. M., Pryseski, C., & Kim, E. (2018). The effects of coaching on English teachers’ reading instruction  practices and adolescent students’ reading comprehension. Literacy Research and Instruction, 57(3), 255-275.
  12. Dea, P., & Negassa, D. (2019). The influence of demographic factors on teachers’instructional practices and challenges in including  students with visual impairment in Government Secondary Schools of harari region. International Journal of Education and Literacy  Studies, 7(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.3p.19  
  13. Ditona, G., & Rico, F. (2021). Reading level of grade II pupils scaffolding for reading program of Eastern schools in Botolan District,  Philippines. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSS), 5(8), 86-94.
  14. Dobronte, A. (2016, December 8). The importance of sociodemographics in online surveys. CheckMarket. Retrieved April 26, 2024,  from https://www.checkmarket.com/blog/socio demographics-online-surveys/  
  15. Edwards, P. A., & Danridge, J. C. (2001). DEVELOPING COLLABORATION. Collaboration for diverse learners: Viewpoints and  practices, 251.
  16. Francisco, April Rose S. (2020). Teachers’ Personal and Professional Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Students’ Academic  Performance in English. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 80-91. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3997430   
  17. Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher  and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies.
  18. Ferreira, J. M., Nunes, F. R., Modesto, W., Gonçalves, M. P., & Bahamondes, L. (2014). Reasons for Brazilian women to switch from  different contraceptives to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Contraception, 89(1), 17-21.
  19. Indeed Editorial Team. (2023). 7 demographic marketing examples indeed.com. Retrieved April 26, 2024, from  https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/careerdevelopment/demographic-marketing-examples  
  20. Grant, R. A., & Wong, S. D. (2003). Barriers to literacy for language-minority learners: An argument for change in the literacy  education profession. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(5), 386-394.
  21. Harn, B., Fritz, R., & Berg, T. (2014). Effective literacy instruction in inclusive schools. In Handbook of effective inclusive schools  (pp. 229-246). Routledge.
  22. Hightower, A. M., Delgado, R. C., Lloyd, S. C., Wittenstein, R., Sellers, K., & Swanson, C. B. (2011). Improving student learning by  supporting quality teaching. Retrieved on, 3, 14.
  23. Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2019). Student centered cooperative learning: Linking concepts in education to promote student  learning. Springer.
  24. Johnson, N. S. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Language Learners and Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation, Walden  University).
  25. Kelleher, F., Severin, F. O., Samson, M., De, A., Afamasaga-Wright, T., & Sedere, U. M. (2011). Women and the teaching profession:  Exploring the feminisation debate. Unesco.
  26. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?. Review of educational research, 86(4), 945-980.
  27. Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., Hudson, R. F., & Konold, T. R. (2009). Identifying essential instructional components of literacy tutoring  for struggling beginning read Learning Policy Institute. (2016, October 26). Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of the Research.  learningpolicyinstitute.org.
  28. Louick, R., Leider, C. M., Daley, S. G., Proctor, C. P., & Gardner, G. L. (2016). Motivation for reading among struggling middle  school readers: A mixed methods study. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 260-269.
  29. Maspul, K. A. (2024). Enhancing Reading Instruction with Reciprocal Teaching: A Focus on Technology Integration. GLOBAL:  Education Language and Humanity Journal, 1(2), 66-74.
  30. Maylor, U. (2009). ‘They do not relate to Black people like us’: Black teachers as role models for Black pupils. Journal of Education  Policy, 24(1), 1-21.
  31. Minor, C. (2023). Best practices in literacy instruction. Guilford Publications.
  32. Monte-Sano, C. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence,  perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 212-249.
  33. Moore, J., & Whitfield, V. (2009). Building schoolwide capacity for preventing reading failure. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 622-624. Murawski, W. W. (2009). Collaborative teaching in secondary schools: Making the co-teaching marriage work!. Corwin Press.
  34. Nicholas, M., Veresov, N., & Clark, J. C. (2021). Guided reading–Working within a child's zone of proximal development. Learning,  Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100530.
  35. Nickerson, M. E. (2020). Factors Affecting Resistance and Adaptation Behavior to Innovative Digital Pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation,  Pepperdine University).
  36. Nwosu, K. C., Wahl, W. P., Oparaugo, U. I., Ezennaka, A. O., Ibrahim, D. B., Ahmed, A. O., Ementa, N. C., Alaribe, C. O., Akuneme,  C. C., & Nnaemeka, G. U. (2021, December 13). Teachers' sociodemographic characteristics, psychological distress, job satisfaction,  and their willingness to include children with special needs in regular classes. Education Research International. Retrieved April 26,  2024, from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2021/3119185/  
  37. Ogle, D., & Klemp, R. M. (2007). Building literacy in social studies: Strategies for improving comprehension and critical thinking.  ASCD.
  38. Oo, T. Z., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the reflection-based reciprocal teaching approach for reading  comprehension achievement in upper secondary school in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 675-698.
  39. Pressley, T., Allington, R. L., & Pressley, M. (2023). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. Guilford  Publications.
  40. Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative  inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82-94.
  41. Sanford, K. L. (2015). Factors affecting the reading comprehension of secondary students with disabilities. University of San Francisco.
  42. Schiller, J. A. (2017). The Alchemy of Meaning-Making in a Summer Literacy Practicum: Using a Responsive Teaching Framework  to Scaffold In-Service Teachers' Understandings of Inferential Read Aloud Instruction (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New  York at Buffalo).
  43. Shapiro, L. R., & Solity, J. (2016). Differing effects of two synthetic phonics programmes on early reading development. British Journal  of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 182-203.
  44. Survey Monkey. (2023). Demographic survey questions: Why & how to ask. SurveyMonkey. 
  45. Tomarong, L., Abendan, C. F., Kilag, O. K., Apas, M., Undalok, V., & Alcorcon, J. J. (2023). The Lindamood-Bell Reading  Intervention: A Pathway to Enhanced Reading Skills in Pupils. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education  (2994-9521), 1(5), 322-332.
  46. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. Ascd.
  47. Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need-and  what we can do about it. ReadHowYouWant. com.
  48. Wood, T. D. (2009). Teacher perceptions of gender-based differences among elementary school teachers. Saint Louis University. Wright, T. S. (2019). Reading to learn from the start: The power of interactive read-alouds. American Educator, 42(4), 4.ers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 277-297.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic