Philippine E-Journals

References:

1. Adams, M.J. and Collins, A.M. (1979). “A schema-theoretic view of reading” in Fredolle, R.O. (ed.) Discourse Processing.’ Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Norwood N. J. Ablex
2. Alcantara, J. S. (2017). Status of the reading comprehension of the second year (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of the Visayas, Cebu City.
3. Alegrid, R. (2016). Theories and its implications for reading. Retrieved on March 21, 2018 from https://rogelioalegrid.wordpress.com/2016/06/26/theories-and-its-implications-for-reading/html.
4. Allen, I.E. and Seaman, C.A. (2007) Likert Scales and Data Analyses. Quality Progress, 40, 64-65.
5. Alqahtani, S.S. Technology-based interventions for children with reading difficulties: a literature review from 2010 to 2020. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 3495–3525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09859-1
6. Alumbro, E.C., (2001). The reading skills of the VISCA, foundation elementary school pupils: A basis for an improved reading instruction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cebu Normal University, Cebu City.
7. Anderson, R. C. (1978). “Schema-directed processes in language comprehension “in Lesgold, A.et al(eds) cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum.
8. Anthony Abaidoo) 2018, Factors contributing to academic performance of students in a Junior High School, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/450284
9. Aram, D. & I. Levin (2016). Mother-child joint writing in low SES: Sociocultural factors, maternal mediation, and early literacy. Cognitive Development, 16, 831–852. Google Scholar.
10. Aton, M.C.C. (2016). Improving the reading proficiency of grade 7 students of Philsaga  High School Foundation Incorporated through a reading intervention program (Unpublished master’s thesis).PNU-Mindanao.
11. Beck, I. & McKeown, M. (2019). Creating robust vocabulary—frequently asked questions and extended examples. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar.
12. Bergeson, T. (2004). Race, poverty, and academic achievement. Available on http://www.doh.wa.gov/SBOH/ESS/documents/Race&Poverty.pdf
13. Blakely, S. What is Reading? - Definition & Process. (2016, October 14). Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-reading-definition-process.html.
14. Bodrova, E.; Leong, D.J.; (1999). Literacy standards for pre-school learners.  Educational leadership(Alexandria, VA), vol. 57, no. 2, p. 42–46.
15. Brownell, M. T. (2017). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 22,(3), 154-164.
16. Bryce, N. (2017). Meeting the reading challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 481.
17. Burgess, S.R. & Lonigan C.J.(2017). Development of the components of phonological awareness across the preschool year. Manuscript in preparation.
18. Cabardo, J. R. O. (2016). Reading Proficiency Level of Students: Basis For Reading Intervention Program. Hagonoy National High School/Southeastern College of Padada, Inc.
19. Cadiz-Gabejan, A. M., & Quirino, M. C. (2021). Students’ Reading Proficiency and Academic Performance. International Journal of English Language Studies, 3(6), 30-40.
20. Carrell, P. L.et al.(eds.) Interactive Approaches to second Language Reading. Cambridge: CUP
21. Çeliköz, N., Erişen, Y., & Şahin, M. (2019). Cognitive learning theories with emphasis on latent learning, Gestalt and information processing theories. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 9 (3). ERIC
22. Chavkin, N. (2019). Families and schools in a pluralistic society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Chen, J. C. (2017). Explicit instruction of reading strategies at senior high school in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s dissertation). National Kaohsiung Normal University. Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
24. Cimmiyotti, C.B. (2019). Impact of Reading Ability on Academic Performance at the Primary Level. Master’s Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 127. Accessed from http://scholar.dominican.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=masters theses on November 10, 2015.
25. Coyne, C., Isaac, J., &Schwartz, J. (2019). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 74-88.
26. Cromley, J. (2017). Reading achievement and science proficiency: International comparisons from the programme on international student assessment. Reading Psychology, 30, 89- 118.
27. Dale, E., & Tyler, R. (2016).A study of the factor influencing the difficulty of reading materials for adults of limited reading ability. In W. H. Dubay (Ed.), Unlocking Language: The Classic Readability Studies (80- 107). Costa Mesa, California: Impact Information.
28. Dentón, C. A. (2016). Responsive reading instruction: Flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
29. Dowhower, S. Supporting a strategic stance in the classroom: A comprehension framework for helping teachers help students to be strategic. The Reading Teacher, vol. 52, no. 7 (1999): pp. 673–68.  
30. Duke, B., Harper, G., &Johnston, M. (2013). Connectivism as a Digital Age Learning Theory. The International HETL Review, Special Issue, 2013.
31. Dunaway, M.K. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. In Reference Services Review. 39(4), (pp. 675-685). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321111186686
32. Ehri, L. C. & Roberts, T. A. (2017). The roots of learning to read and write: Acquisition of letters and phonemic awareness. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B.
33. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
34. Fajri, M. 2017. The Correlation Between Students’ Reading Interest and their speed reading. Tarbiyah and Teachers’ Training. State Islamic University Syarif Jakarta.
35. Flippo, R. (2014). Assessing readers qualitative diagnosis and instruction. 2^nd Edition. Chapter 2 Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/Libraries/books/assessing-readers--second-ed--chapter3.pdf Copublished with Routledge/Taylor & Francis
36. Frankel, K.F., Pearson, D.P., & Nair, M. (2017). Reading comprehension and reading disability. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.) Handbook of reading disability research. New York & London: Routledge
37. Foorman, B.R. & Torgesen, J.K. (2017). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55—64. Google Scholar, Crossref.
38. Fries, C.(2018). Toward an understanding of language: Charles Carpenter Fries in perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
39. Gardner, H. (2019). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should  teach. London: Fontana.
40. Gildrie, R. (2017). The nature of reading. Retrieved on December 12, 2017 from https://www.scribd.com/document/35813524/Interac1.
41. Gillilan, S. (2019). Decoding. Reading Rockets. Retrieved from https://www.readingrockets.org/helping/target/comprehension
42. Goldenberg, C. (2016). Promoting early literacy development among Spanish speaking children: Lessons from two studies. In E.H. Hiebert & B.M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start (pp.171-200). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
43. Hammond, J. (2017). Scaffolding: A focus on teaching and learning in literacy education. Australia: PETA.
44. Hernando, A.M.V. (2018). Improving the reading skills of grade VI pupils of Ambago Central Elementary School, Butuan City through series of reading activities. (Unpublished master’s thesis). PNU-Agusan .
45. Hidi, S. (2017). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
46. Hiebert, E.H., Wilson, K.M., & Trainin, G. (in press). Are students really reading in independent reading contexts? An examination of comprehension-based silent reading rate. In E.H. Hiebert & D.R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
47. Hijazi, D. (2019). Difficulties Jordanian non-English major university students face while learning English as a foreign language: A student perspective. Journal of the College of Education, Aswan University, 26, 29-54. 
48. Hijazi, D. (2018). The relationship between students’ reading comprehension and their
49. achievement in English. US-China Foreign Language, 16(3), 141-153.
50. Hudson, T. (2019). Teaching Second Language Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Hungi, N. (2016). Examining differences in mathematics and reading achievement among grade pupils in Vietnam. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 155-164.
52. Hsu, L. (2016). Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44 (3), 1-19.
53. Izizinga, R. (2016). The teaching of reading in Uganda. In K. Parry (Ed.) Language and literacy in Uganda: Towards a sustainable reading culture. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.
54. Johnson, M.J. , Kress, R.A., & Pikulski, P. L. (1987). INFORMAL READING INVENTORIES (2^ND ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
55. Joshi,M.R.(2018). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension, reading and writing quarterly 2018; 21, 209-219.
56. Krashen, S. (2016). The power of reading. Portsmouth: Heinemann and Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
57. Krashen, S. D. (1993). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal 73: 440–64.
58. Kirsch, I. S. (2018). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. In National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
59. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2019). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties (Vol. 4). Guilford Press.
60. Koda, K., & Zehler, A. M. (Eds.). (2018). Learning to read across languages: Cross-Linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development. London: Routledge.
61. Lasaten, R.C. & Racca L.M. (2016). English language proficiency and academic performance of Philippine Science High School students. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Vol. 2, No. 2.
62. Levitas, J. (2021). Reading Intervention: Programs Strategies and Activities. Retrieved on May 15, 2022 from https://study.com/academy/lesson/reading-intervention-programs-strategies-and activities.
63. MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283-305.
64. Mabanes, P. (2022). Effectiveness of DEAR and ABRC Materials in Improving the Reading Comprehension of the Elementary Gradepupils. Matuya tuya Elementary School. Torrijos Marinduque.
65. Marcon, V. (2016).Reading proficiency of first year students of Philsaga High  School Foundation, Inc.: Basis for developing reading intervention program (Unpublished master’ thesis). PNU – Agusan.
66. Martizano, J. (2017). Reading difficulties of grade 7 students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). PNU – Mindanao.
67. Mascolo, M.E. and Fischer, K.W. (2005).Constructivist theories.Theories of development. [WWW document] available at http://www.academia.edu/8906476/Constructivist_Theories
68. Mehta, A. (2018). Here’s the difference between proficiency in reading and literacy. Financial Express: Read to Lead. Retrieved from https://www.financialexpress.com/education-2/heres-the-difference-between-proficiency-in-reading-and-literacy/1323818/
69. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Distance learning. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academic
70. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Performance. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/performance
71. Morrow, L. M.(2019). Current practices in early literacy development. In L. M. Morrow, L. B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 43-64). New York: Guilford Press.
72. Moss, J., & Fenster, M. F. (2018). From literature to literacy: Bridging learning in the library and the primary grade classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
73. National Reading Panel.(2016). Comprehension III teacher preparation and comprehension strategies instruction. (Chap.4). Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrplch4- 111.pdf
74. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 113-131).  New York: The Guilford Press.
75. Nordquist, R.2020. Cause and Effect in Composition. Thought Co.  Retrieved from thought.com/cause-and-effect-composition-1689834
76. Nutbrown, C. (2017). Threads of thinking: Young children learning and the role of early education. 3^rd ed. London: SAGE.
77. Nyarko, K., Kugbey, N., Kofi, C. C., Cole, Y. A., & Adentwi, K. I. (2018). English reading proficiency and academic performance among lower primary school children in Ghana. Sage Open, 8(3), 2158244018797019.
78. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2013). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
79. Pressley, M. (2017). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. InC. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction:  Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York: The Guilford Press
80. Pretorius, E.l. (2016). lnferem:e generalion in the reading of expository texts by university students. Pretoria: Dnisa
81. Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2015). The Contributions of Oral and Silent Reading Fluency to Reading Comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167–201. doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1025118
82. Programme        for        International    Student            Assessment    (PISA) Results            from    PISA   2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_PHL.pdf
83. Rasinski, T. V., Reutzel, C. R., Chard, D. & Linan-Thompson, S. (2016). Reading  fluency. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach E (eds), Handbook of Reading Research, Volume IV (pp. 286-319). New York: Routledge.
84. Rice, R. (2018). Implementing Connectivist Teaching Strategies in Traditional K-12 Classrooms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 645–655. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91716-0_51
85. Rivamonte, M. (2017). Assessment of the levels of Reading Comprehension of the Grade 3 pupils in Matuyatuya Elementary School S.Y 2016-2017. Torrijos, Marinduque.
86. Rogoff, B. (2019). Children’s guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In R. Woxniak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 121- 153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Romero, V. (2016). Improving the reading comprehension skills of Grade 7 Students of Sta. Josefa National High School through EReCoS (Enhancing Reading  Comprehension Skills) activities. (Unpublished master’s thesis). PNU – Mindanao.
88. Ruminar et al., (2022). Drop Everything and Read (DEAR) Activity as Means of Increasing Students’ Reading Habits. Brawijaya University.  Malang, Indonesia.
89. Samuels, S.J., Hiebert, E.H., & Rasinski, T.V. (2016). Eye movements make reading possible. In E.H. Hiebert & D.R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers (pp. 24-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
90. Sellers, M. (2016, May 12). Who better to choose? Every child is different.  Retrieved from http://everychildisdifferent/whobettertochoose/.
91. Share, D. L. (2017). Phonological recording and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading  acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
92. Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing roles for Educators and Designers. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 3.
93. Stevens, K. (2017). The effect of topic interest on reading comprehension of higher ability students. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 365-368.
94. Sze, S. (2017). Learning Style and the special needs child. Journal of Instructional Psychology. Vol.36, No.4.
95. Tagupa, L.G (2017). Reading proficiency of grade 7 towards an intervention program. (Unpublished master’s thesis). PNU – Mindanao.
96. Teachmint (2018). What is Proficiency? – Definition. Retrieved from https://www.teachmint.com/glossary/p/proficiency/
97. Teposo, M. (2016).Reading proficiency of grade 7 students of Bayugan City Division. (Unpublished master’s thesis). PNU – Mindanao.
98. Texas Educational Agency. (2018). Comprehension instruction, 4-8. Retrieved from http://www.netxv.net/pm_attach/67/TRI-Comprehension_Instr.pdf.
99. Torio, B. A. (2019). Oral Reading Proficiency Test (ORPT) Result and Its Relation to TheGrade Seven Students’ Academic Performance in English: Basis for Intervention. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2M).
100. Warford, M. K. (2017). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 252-258.
101. Van Praag, M., and S. Hoogendoorn. 2018. Ethnic Diversity and Team Performance: A Field Experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6731.[Google Scholar].
102. Villacortes, J. (2016). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities. In C.A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren, & K. Apel, (Eds.). Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders. New York & London: Guilford Press.
103. Villamin, A. M., Diaz, L. S., Talens, B. A., & Santos, N. S. (2017). Gateways and skyways to developmental reading. Quezon: Katha Publishing.
104. Villaume , S. K. , & Brabham , E. G. ( 2019 ). Phonics instruction: Beyond the debate . The Reading Teacher , 56 , 478 – 482 .[Google Scholar].
105. Zunguze, S.J., (2017). Teachers’ views on factors contributing to low level reading levels among Mozambican primary school pupils. Dissertation, University Of Zambia. Retrieved from http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1993/salvador00001.PDF?sequence=1. 
106. Zywica, J., Richards, K. A., & Gomez, K. (2011). Affordances of a scaffolded-social. On the Horizon, , Vol. 19 Iss 1, 3. doi:10.1108/1074812111.