Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 5 (2025)

Physics Teachers’ Competence and Extent of Use of Laboratory Approaches

John Marvin F. Remigio | Vida V. Antonio | Marc Paul T. Calzada

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

Science education is vital for developing students' critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and scientific literacy. Effective scientific training relies on both theoretical instruction and hands-on experience using laboratory equipment. Laboratories serve as essential instructional environments where students explore scientific principles, conduct experiments, and apply theoretical knowledge in practical situations. The efficient utilization of laboratory equipment predominantly depends on the expertise of science educators in administering and integrating these resources into their instruction. Hence, a descriptive-correlational research approach was conducted to determine the knowledge and skill competence of public school teachers in the Schools Division of Ilocos Norte. Using a researchermade survey questionnaire, it was revealed that the respondents have very high competence when it comes to laboratory instruction. With a positive correlation, the results revealed that teachers with high competence in laboratory techniques, equipment handling, and experiment facilitation are more likely to integrate laboratory activities into their teaching, fostering active learning and scientific inquiry among students. The study emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development and skills training to maximize the use of laboratory resources. Thus, Schools should invest in training programs and provide adequate facilities to ensure teachers can effectively implement laboratory-based instruction, enhancing instructional effectiveness and student engagement in science learning.



References:

  1. Bao,  L.,  &  Koenig,  K.  (2019).  Physics  education research  for  21st  century  learning. Disci-plinary  and  Interdisciplinary  Science  Edu-cation Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
  2. Cooper,  A.  C.,  Osness,  J.  B.,  Hester,  S.  D.,  &  Bol-ger,   M.   S.   (2024).   How   do   laboratory teaching  assistants  learn  to  support  sci-ence practices? Exploring the intersection between instructor reasoning and actions. CBE—Life     Sciences     Education,     23(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-03-0118
  3. Copriady,  J.  (2014).  Teachers  competency  in the  teaching  and  learning  of  Chemistry practical. Mediterranean  Journal  of  Social Sciences, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2014.V5N8P312
  4. Dah, N. M., Noor, M. S. A. M., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Azziz,  S.  S.  S.  A.  (2024).  The  impacts  of open  inquiry  on  students’  learning  in  sci-ence: A systematic literature review. Edu-cational   Research   Review,   43,   100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601
  5. Datoy,  F.  C.  (2020).  Teaching  competence  and challenges  encountered  in  secondary  sci-ence  instruction. International  Journal  of English   Language   Studies,   2(4),   33–46. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2020.2.4.4
  6. De  Borja,  J.,  &  Marasigan,  A.  (2020). Status  of science  laboratory  in  a  public  junior  high school. https://www.re-searchgate.net/publica-tion/339832401_Status_of_Science_La-boratory_in_a_Public_Junior_High_School
  7. Eajess.  (2020).  Adequacy  of  laboratory  facili-ties  for  effective  implementation  of  com-petence-based  curriculum  in  public  sec-ondary  schools  in  Arumeru  District,  Tan-zania. https://eajess.ac.tz/2020/08/19/ade-quacy-of-laboratory-facilities-for-effec-tive-implementation-of-competence-based-curriculum-in-public-secondary
  8. Efendi, N., & Jayanti, A. S. L. (2024). Optimizing science  laboratory  management  for  en-hanced  student  learning  outcomes. Indo-nesian  Journal  of  Law  and  Economics  Re-view, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1185
  9. Eymur,  G.,  &  Çetin,  P.  S.  (2024).  Investigating the role of an inquiry-based science lab on students’ scientific literacy. Instructional Science. https://doi.org10.1007/s11251-024-09672-w
  10. Garcia,  J.,  Uluan,  A.  Y.,  Barat,  I.  J.,  Lubay,  J.  N., Macagba,  I.,  &  Mahinay,  H.  (2022). Lived experiences  of  science  major  students  in the absence of laboratory activities. Amer-ican Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.513
  11. Germuth,  A.  (2019).  Professional  development that    changes    teaching    and    improves learning. Journal     of     Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0025
  12. Kranz, J., Baur, A., & Möller, A. (2022). Learners’ challenges in understanding and perform-ing  experiments:  A  systematic  review  of the  literature. Studies  in  Science  Educa-tion, 59(2), 321–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2138151
  13. Liu,  E.,  Li,  N.,  Liu,  C.,  Guo,  S.,  &  Guo,  S.  (2021). Rethinking the factor of duration  for pro-fessional  development: A workshop-sem-inar-demonstration  class  model  for  sci-ence  teachers. Eurasia  Journal  of  Mathe-matics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11351
  14. Lutfia, B. A., Wilujeng, I., & Zakwandi, R. (2024). The impact of problem-solving laboratory in physics learning to improve students’ science literacy ability. Nucleation and At-mospheric Aerosols. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133834
  15. Marasigan,  A.,  &  Abad,  H.  (2020).  Readiness  of science  laboratory  facilities  of  the  public junior high school in Lanao del Sur, Philip-pines. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10294.52805
  16. MR Fuentes-Marquez, 2025 /Assessing Government Support and Sustainability among Marawi Siege SurvivorsIJMABER2568Volume 6| Number 5| May| 202
  17. 5May,     D.,     Terkowsky,     C.,     Varney,     V.,     & Boehringer, D. (2023). Between hands-on experiments  and  Cross  Reality  learning environments –contemporary    educa-tional approaches in instructional labora-tories. European  Journal  of  Engineering Education, 48(5), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2248819
  18. Montgomery, T. D., Buchbinder, J. R., Gawalt, E. S., Iuliucci, R. J., Koch, A. S., Kotsikorou, E., Lackey,  P.  E.,  Lim,  M.  S.,  Rohde,  J.  J.,  Rup-precht, A. J., Srnec, M. N., Vernier, B., & Ev-anseck, J. D. (2022). The scientific method as  a  scaffold  to  enhance  communication skills in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Ed-ucation, 99(6), 2338–2350. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00113
  19. Nipales,  J.  B.  (2019).  Competencies  of  science teachers  in  teaching  science  subjects  in the K to 12 curriculum. International Jour-nal  of  English,  Literature  and  Social  Sci-ences, 4(4).
  20. Nopas, D., & Kerdsomboon, C. (2024). Fostering global  competence  in  teacher  education: Curriculum  integration  and  professional development. Higher   Education   Studies, 14(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n2p1
  21. Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom,  E.  (2022).  Guided  inquiry-based learning  in  secondary-school  chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research    and    Practice,    24(1),    50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00110a
  22. Pacala, F., & Cabrales, P. (2023). Science educa-tion in the Philippine countryside: A  phe-nomenological    study. https://www.re-searchgate.net/publica-tion/371043522_SCIENCE_EDUCA-TION_IN_THE_PHILIPPINE_COUNTRY-SIDE_A_PHENOMENOLOGICAL_STUDY
  23. Spatz, J. T. V. (2022). Integrating inquiry-based learning   in   physics   teacher   education through   a   seminar   about   processes   of gaining  knowledge  in  science. Journal  of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2297/1/012027
  24. Supriyatman, S., Darmadi, A. K. I. W., Miftah, M., Supriyadi,  S.,  &  Ismail,  I.  (2024). Compe-tence   of   junior   high   schools’   science teachers    in    implementing    laboratory teaching: A case study on Palu, Centre Cel-ebes. Jurnal   Penelitian   Pendidikan   IPA (JPPIPA), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7510
  25. Wang, H., Hong, Z., She, H., Smith, T. J., Fielding, J., & Lin, H. (2022). The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientific  and  mathematical  literacies. In-ternational   Journal   of   STEM   Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z
  26. Zabala, G. M., & Dayaganon, A. J. (2022). Compe-tency of teachers and laboratory environ-ment  in  an  online  setting  as  predictors  of science  process  skills  of  students:  A  con-vergent design. Science Education Interna-tional, 34(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i3.4.
  27. Zuhaida,  A.,  &  Imaduddin,  M.  (2019).  Analisis level   literasi   laboratorium   kimia   dari calon  guru  IPA  tahun  pertama. Zuhaida  | Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i2.16446

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic