Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG Curriculum
Carren Delfin Bensurto | Lebni Tenerife Bernardino
Discipline: Teacher Training
Abstract:
This qualitative phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of teachers in challenging areas regarding the implementation of
the MATATAG Curriculum. Fourteen purposively selected teachers
from various schools in a district in Capiz participated in the study. Data
were analyzed using coding and thematic analysis. Findings revealed
that teachers viewed their role in implementing the MATATAG Curriculum as facilitators of holistic learning, adaptive instruction, and inclusive education. While most had attended seminars and workshops, they
expressed a need for more specialized and in-depth training. Key challenges included a lack of instructional materials, time constraints, and
difficulties in adapting to the new framework. The physical environment significantly impacted curriculum implementation, with inadequate classroom space and resources hindering effective instruction.
Environmental barriers such as overcrowded classrooms and insufficient facilities further complicated execution. Teachers identified the
need for additional support, including increased funding, more teaching resources, and enhanced professional development. They also emphasized the importance of administrative and community support in
ensuring successful curriculum implementation. The MATATAG Curriculum showed promise in improving pupils’ academic performance and
learning outcomes, but its effectiveness depended on sufficient instructional support and resources. To overcome implementation challenges,
teachers recommended stronger stakeholder collaboration, curriculum
refinements, and enhanced training programs. They also highlighted
the importance of adopting innovative and adaptive teaching strategies.These findings suggest that the successful implementation of the
MATATAG Curriculum requires a comprehensive approach that integrates teacher training, resource allocation, and institutional support.
Addressing the identified challenges and barriers will strengthen curriculum delivery and enhance student learning outcomes.
References:
- Abeln, L. (2015). Investigating the lived experi-ence of teacher decision-making: A phe-nomenological approach (Doctoral disser-tation). Retrieved fromhttps://digital-commons.georgefox.edu/edd/61
- Abragan, F., Abarcas, V., Aquino, I. M., &Ba-gongon, R. E. (2022). Research review on K-12 curriculum implementation in the Philippines: A generic perspective.Euro-pean Journal of Educational and Social Sci-ences, 7(1), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.5281/ze-nodo.7272126
- Abragan, J. P., Baltazar, M. T., & Sanchez, R. (2022). Challenges in implementing cur-riculum reforms in Philippine basic edu-cation: Insights from teachers and admin-istrators.Asian Journal of Education Stud-ies, 15(3), 45–58
- Abragan, J. R., Kilag, D. L., &Macasero, C. P. (2022). Educational reforms and curricu-lum implementation: A Philippine per-spective. Journal of Educational Innova-tions, 23(4), 102-114.
- Abulencia, A. S. (2020). Challenges and re-sponses to curriculum reforms: A Philip-pine perspective. Journal of Education and Development, 11(2), 45-56.
- American Psychological Association. (2021). Understanding educational challenges. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/pub-lisher/apapubs
- Aquino, E. (2024). Developing an evaluation scale for assessing the effective imple-mentation of Matatag Curriculum in Phil-ippine public schools: Exploratory se-quential design. Journal of Interdiscipli-nary Perspectives, 2(5), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.007.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman
- Bayot, A. C. (2024). The readiness and chal-lenges faced of grade 4 teachers in the im-plementation of MATATAG curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.re-searchgate.net/publica-tion/389735675_The_Readi-ness_and_Chal-lenges_Faced_of_Grade_4_Teach-ers_in_the_Implementation_of_MATA-TAG_Curriculum
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of hu-man development. Harvard University Press
- Bush, T. (2018). Leadership and management development in education. Educational Management Administration & Leader-ship, 46(2), 202-219.
- Cabanero, A. C. (2024). Teachers’ preparation and school heads’ support on MATATAG curriculum: Bases for an intervention pro-gram. INSTABRIGHT e-GAZETTE, 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.insta-brightgazette.com
- CASEL. (2015). Social and emotional learning competencies. https://casel.org/funda-mentals-of-sel/what-is-the-casel-frame-work/
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2003). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-basedsocial and emotional learning programs. Chicago.
- Churchwell, K., Elkind, M. S., Benjamin, R. M., Carson, A. P., Chang, E. K., Lawrence, W., ... & American Heart Association. (2020). Call to action: Structural racism as a fun-damental driver of health disparities: A presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 142(24), e454–e468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Re-search methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). De-signing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
- de Guzman, A. B. (2003). The dynamics of edu-cational reforms in the Philippine basic and higher education sectors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 39-50.
- Bensurto& Bernardino, 2025/Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG CurriculumIJMABER 2623Volume 6| Number 5| May| 2025
- Department of Education, Philippines. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum framework.DepEd Memorandum 54, s. 2023. Department of Education.
- DepEd. (2022). Guidelines on the implementa-tion of the MATATAG Curriculum. Depart-ment of Education, Philippines.
- Farrell, E. (2020). Researching lived experience in education: Misunderstood or missed opportunity? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Fried-man, R. M. (2005). Implementation re-search: A synthesis of the literature. Uni-versity of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educa-tional change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educa-tional change. New York: Teachers College Press.Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educa-tional change. Teachers College Press.
- Hajan B.H., Castillo-Hajan B., & Marasigan A.C.(2019). Second language academic writ-ing: A study of teachers’ beliefs and peda-gogical practices in senior high school. Online Submission, 21(9), 9–35.
- Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (2013). Assessing leadership and school improvement link-ages. Journal of Educational Administra-tion, 41(3), 320-334.
- Jansen, J. D. (2020). Curriculum as a political and social practice. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(1), 39-54.
- Kilag O.K.T., Andrin G.R., Abellanosa C., Villaver M.T.Jr., Uy F.T.& Sasan J.M.V.(2024) Matatag curriculum rollout: Understand-ing challenges for effective implementa-tion.*International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation Sus-tainability and Excellence (IMJRISE)*1(5).
- Lagbao, J. (2024). INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MATATAG CURRICULUM: VIEWS OF THE TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS. EPRA International Journal of Environ-mental Economics, Commerce and Educa-tional Management. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17629
- Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Lead-ership & Management, 40(1), 5-22.
- Loza, J. F. (2024). How can teachers embrace curriculum change: Perceptions on the implementation of MATATAG curriculum. Philippine Normal University. https://www.studocu.com/ph/docu-ment/ateneo-de-naga-university/ab-bse-english/values-education-teachers-per-ceptionsonthe-implementationof-mata-tagcurriculum/112217394
- MacaseroR.(2023) Less congested K–10 curric-ulum.Rappler.Magsambol, B. (2024). Teachers dismayed by ‘chaotic’ rollout of Matatag curriculum. Rappler. https://www.rap-pler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/teachers-dismayed-chaotic-rollout-matatag-curric-ulum-school-year-2024-2025
- Manansala, P., & Aquino, J. R. (2023). The role of school leaders in curriculum innovation in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 112-125.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
- OECD. (2019). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA experience. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Padillo, G. G., Manguilimotan, R. P., Capuno, R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional De-velopment Activities and Teacher Perfor-mance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506.
- Piala, M.C., Kilag, O.K.T., Tañiza, F.N.T., Groe-newald, E.S., Abella, J.L., & Cordova Jr., N.A.(2024). Curriculum in action: Probing into facilitators and impediments in the Philippine educational setting.Journal Name, 2(1).Bensurto& Bernardino, 2025/Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG CurriculumIJMABER2624Volume 6| Number 5| May| 2025
- Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- Saro, J., Montejo, C., Sucong, J., Bustamante, M., & Perez, J.(2024). A Qualitative Explora-tion on the Perceived Impact of the MATA-TAG Curriculum on Basic Education Teaching in the School Year 2024-2025.International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.4.3134
- Tabalanza, J.A.C., Singh, M.B., Edris, A.A., &Taba-jen, M.R.(2022). Effects of socio-emo-tional learning interventions before and after pandemic: A comparative literature review.Asian Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Humanities, 9(1), 1-15.
- Tarraya H.O.(2023) Teachers’ workload pol-icy: Its impact on Philippine public school teachers (Public policy analysis and re-view).Online Submission.
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C.(2010). Mixed method research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field.InTashakkori,A.&Ted-dlie,C.(Eds.),SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). SAGE Publications.
- UNESCO.(2015). Education for all 2015 na-tional review: The Philippines.Paris:
- UNESCO.van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived expe-rience: Human science for an action sensi-tive pedagogy. Routledge.
- Vitug, J. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum pilot: Challenges and lessons. Philippine Daily Inquirer.
- Vu,T.&Nguyen,T.H.L.(2021). New curricu-lum, existing problems: Teacher percep-tion of the English language curriculum renewal in Vietnam.Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching,19(1),207–224.https://doi.org/10.56040/mcla1827von