HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 6 no. 5 (2025)

Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG Curriculum

Carren Delfin Bensurto | Lebni Tenerife Bernardino

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This qualitative phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of teachers in challenging areas regarding the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. Fourteen purposively selected teachers from various schools in a district in Capiz participated in the study. Data were analyzed using coding and thematic analysis. Findings revealed that teachers viewed their role in implementing the MATATAG Curriculum as facilitators of holistic learning, adaptive instruction, and inclusive education. While most had attended seminars and workshops, they expressed a need for more specialized and in-depth training. Key challenges included a lack of instructional materials, time constraints, and difficulties in adapting to the new framework. The physical environment significantly impacted curriculum implementation, with inadequate classroom space and resources hindering effective instruction. Environmental barriers such as overcrowded classrooms and insufficient facilities further complicated execution. Teachers identified the need for additional support, including increased funding, more teaching resources, and enhanced professional development. They also emphasized the importance of administrative and community support in ensuring successful curriculum implementation. The MATATAG Curriculum showed promise in improving pupils’ academic performance and learning outcomes, but its effectiveness depended on sufficient instructional support and resources. To overcome implementation challenges, teachers recommended stronger stakeholder collaboration, curriculum refinements, and enhanced training programs. They also highlighted the importance of adopting innovative and adaptive teaching strategies.These findings suggest that the successful implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum requires a comprehensive approach that integrates teacher training, resource allocation, and institutional support. Addressing the identified challenges and barriers will strengthen curriculum delivery and enhance student learning outcomes.



References:

  1. Abeln, L. (2015). Investigating the lived experi-ence  of  teacher  decision-making:  A  phe-nomenological approach (Doctoral disser-tation).    Retrieved    fromhttps://digital-commons.georgefox.edu/edd/61
  2. Abragan,  F.,  Abarcas,  V.,  Aquino,  I.  M.,  &Ba-gongon,  R.  E.  (2022).  Research  review  on K-12  curriculum  implementation  in  the Philippines:  A  generic  perspective.Euro-pean Journal of Educational and Social Sci-ences, 7(1), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.5281/ze-nodo.7272126
  3. Abragan,  J.  P.,  Baltazar,  M.  T.,  &  Sanchez,  R. (2022).  Challenges  in  implementing  cur-riculum  reforms  in  Philippine  basic  edu-cation: Insights from teachers and admin-istrators.Asian  Journal  of Education  Stud-ies, 15(3), 45–58
  4. Abragan,  J.  R.,  Kilag,  D.  L.,  &Macasero,  C.  P. (2022).  Educational  reforms  and  curricu-lum   implementation:   A   Philippine   per-spective.  Journal  of  Educational  Innova-tions, 23(4), 102-114.
  5. Abulencia,   A.   S.   (2020).   Challenges   and   re-sponses  to  curriculum  reforms:  A  Philip-pine perspective. Journal of Education and Development, 11(2), 45-56.
  6. American   Psychological   Association.   (2021). Understanding    educational    challenges. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/pub-lisher/apapubs
  7. Aquino,  E.  (2024).  Developing  an  evaluation scale  for  assessing  the  effective  imple-mentation  of  Matatag  Curriculum  in  Phil-ippine   public   schools:   Exploratory   se-quential  design.  Journal  of  Interdiscipli-nary Perspectives, 2(5), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.007.
  8. Bandura,  A.  (1997).  Self-efficacy:  The  exercise of control. Freeman
  9. Bayot,  A.  C.  (2024).  The  readiness  and  chal-lenges faced of grade 4 teachers in the im-plementation   of   MATATAG   curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.re-searchgate.net/publica-tion/389735675_The_Readi-ness_and_Chal-lenges_Faced_of_Grade_4_Teach-ers_in_the_Implementation_of_MATA-TAG_Curriculum
  10. Bronfenbrenner,  U.  (1979).  The  ecology  of  hu-man   development.   Harvard   University Press
  11. Bush,  T.  (2018).  Leadership  and  management development   in   education.   Educational Management   Administration   &   Leader-ship, 46(2), 202-219.
  12. Cabanero, A. C. (2024). Teachers’ preparation and school heads’ support on MATATAG curriculum: Bases for an intervention pro-gram.   INSTABRIGHT   e-GAZETTE,   6(2). Retrieved from https://www.insta-brightgazette.com
  13. CASEL.  (2015).  Social  and  emotional  learning competencies. https://casel.org/funda-mentals-of-sel/what-is-the-casel-frame-work/
  14. Collaborative  for  Academic,  Social, and Emotional Learning. (2003). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-basedsocial    and    emotional learning programs. Chicago.
  15. Churchwell,  K.,  Elkind,  M.  S.,  Benjamin,  R.  M., Carson, A. P., Chang, E. K., Lawrence, W., ... &   American   Heart   Association.   (2020). Call  to  action:  Structural  racism  as  a  fun-damental  driver  of  health  disparities:  A presidential  advisory  from  the  American Heart  Association.  Circulation,  142(24), e454–e468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000936
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Re-search  methods  in  education  (8th  ed.). Routledge.
  17. Creswell,  J.  W.,  &  Plano  Clark,  V.  L.  (2017).  De-signing  and  conducting  mixed  methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  18. Darling-Hammond,  L.,  Hyler,  M.  E.,  &  Gardner, M.  (2017).  Effective  teacher  professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
  19. de Guzman, A. B. (2003). The dynamics of edu-cational  reforms  in  the  Philippine  basic and higher education sectors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 39-50.
  20. Bensurto& Bernardino, 2025/Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG CurriculumIJMABER 2623Volume 6| Number 5| May| 2025
  21. Department  of  Education,  Philippines.  (2023). MATATAG Curriculum framework.DepEd  Memorandum  54,  s.  2023.  Department of Education.
  22. DepEd. (2022). Guidelines on the implementa-tion of the MATATAG Curriculum. Depart-ment of Education, Philippines.
  23. Farrell, E. (2020). Researching lived experience in  education:  Misunderstood  or  missed opportunity?    International    Journal    of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
  24. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Fried-man,  R.  M.  (2005).  Implementation  re-search:  A  synthesis  of  the  literature.  Uni-versity of South Florida, Louis de  la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.Freire,  P.  (1970).  Pedagogy  of  the  oppressed. Continuum.
  25. Fullan,  M.  (2007).  The  new  meaning  of  educa-tional  change  (4th  ed.).  Teachers  College Press.
  26. Fullan,  M.  (2015).  The  new  meaning  of  educa-tional change. New York: Teachers College Press.Fullan,  M.  (2015).  The  new  meaning  of  educa-tional change. Teachers College Press.
  27. Hajan  B.H.,  Castillo-Hajan  B.,  &  Marasigan  A.C.(2019).  Second  language  academic  writ-ing: A study of teachers’ beliefs and peda-gogical  practices  in  senior  high  school. Online Submission, 21(9), 9–35.
  28. Hallinger,  P.,  &  Murphy,  J.  (2013).  Assessing leadership  and  school  improvement  link-ages.  Journal  of  Educational  Administra-tion, 41(3), 320-334.
  29. Jansen,  J.  D.  (2020).  Curriculum  as  a  political and  social  practice.  Curriculum  Inquiry, 50(1), 39-54.
  30. Kilag O.K.T., Andrin G.R., Abellanosa C., Villaver M.T.Jr.,  Uy  F.T.&  Sasan  J.M.V.(2024) Matatag  curriculum  rollout:  Understand-ing  challenges  for  effective  implementa-tion.*International Multidisciplinary Journal  of  Research  for  Innovation  Sus-tainability and Excellence (IMJRISE)*1(5).
  31. Lagbao,  J.  (2024).  INITIAL  IMPLEMENTATION OF  THE  MATATAG  CURRICULUM:  VIEWS OF   THE   TEACHERS   AND   PRINCIPALS. EPRA  International  Journal  of  Environ-mental Economics, Commerce and Educa-tional Management. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17629
  32. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven   strong   claims   about   successful school  leadership  revisited.  School  Lead-ership & Management, 40(1), 5-22.
  33. Loza,  J.  F.  (2024).  How  can  teachers  embrace curriculum  change:  Perceptions  on  the implementation of MATATAG curriculum. Philippine Normal University. https://www.studocu.com/ph/docu-ment/ateneo-de-naga-university/ab-bse-english/values-education-teachers-per-ceptionsonthe-implementationof-mata-tagcurriculum/112217394
  34. MacaseroR.(2023) Less congested K–10 curric-ulum.Rappler.Magsambol,  B.  (2024).  Teachers  dismayed  by ‘chaotic’ rollout  of  Matatag  curriculum. Rappler. https://www.rap-pler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/teachers-dismayed-chaotic-rollout-matatag-curric-ulum-school-year-2024-2025
  35. Manansala,  P.,  &  Aquino,  J.  R.  (2023).  The  role of school leaders in curriculum innovation in  the  Philippines.  Philippine  Journal  of Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 112-125.
  36. Merleau-Ponty,  M.  (2012).  Phenomenology  of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
  37. National  Council  of  Teachers  of  Mathematics. (2018).    Principles    and    standards    for school mathematics.
  38. OECD.  (2019).  Measuring  student  knowledge and  skills:   The  PISA  experience.  Paris: OECD Publishing.
  39. Padillo,  G.  G.,  Manguilimotan,  R.  P.,  Capuno,  R. G., & Espina, R. C. (2021). Professional De-velopment  Activities  and  Teacher  Perfor-mance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506.
  40. Piala,  M.C.,  Kilag,  O.K.T.,  Tañiza,  F.N.T.,  Groe-newald,  E.S.,  Abella,  J.L.,  &  Cordova  Jr.,  N.A.(2024).  Curriculum  in  action:  Probing into  facilitators  and  impediments  in  the Philippine     educational     setting.Journal Name, 2(1).Bensurto& Bernardino, 2025/Lived Experiences of Teachers in Challenging Areas in the Implementation of MATATAG CurriculumIJMABER2624Volume 6| Number 5| May| 2025
  41. Rogers,  E.M.  (2003).  Diffusion  of  innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  42. Saro,  J.,  Montejo,  C.,  Sucong,  J.,  Bustamante,  M., &  Perez,  J.(2024).  A  Qualitative  Explora-tion on the Perceived Impact of the MATA-TAG    Curriculum    on    Basic    Education Teaching    in    the    School    Year    2024-2025.International  Journal  of  Advanced Multidisciplinary  Research  and  Studies. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.4.3134
  43. Tabalanza, J.A.C., Singh, M.B., Edris, A.A., &Taba-jen,   M.R.(2022).   Effects   of   socio-emo-tional  learning  interventions  before  and after  pandemic:  A  comparative  literature review.Asian Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Humanities, 9(1), 1-15.
  44. Tarraya  H.O.(2023)  Teachers’  workload  pol-icy: Its impact on Philippine public school teachers  (Public  policy  analysis  and  re-view).Online Submission.
  45. Tashakkori,  A.,  &  Teddlie,  C.(2010).  Mixed method research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field.InTashakkori,A.&Ted-dlie,C.(Eds.),SAGE  Handbook  of  Mixed Methods  in  Social  &  Behavioral  Research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). SAGE Publications.
  46. UNESCO.(2015).  Education  for  all  2015  na-tional     review:     The     Philippines.Paris:
  47. UNESCO.van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived expe-rience: Human science for an action sensi-tive pedagogy. Routledge.
  48. Vitug,  J.  (2024).  MATATAG  Curriculum  pilot: Challenges  and  lessons.  Philippine  Daily Inquirer.
  49. Vu,T.&Nguyen,T.H.L.(2021).  New  curricu-lum,  existing  problems:  Teacher  percep-tion  of  the  English  language  curriculum renewal  in  Vietnam.Electronic  Journal  of Foreign    Language    Teaching,19(1),207–224.https://doi.org/10.56040/mcla1827von