Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 43 no. 3 (2025)

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Teaching 21st Century Literature

Ceasar Louie Recamara | Merlyn Estoque

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the effectiveness of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework in teaching 21st Century Literature to the Grade 11 STEM students of Saint Paul University Surigao. Anchored on the principles of multiple means of engagement, representation, and action and expression, the study aimed to improve students’ understanding and appreciation of literary texts. Utilizing a quasi-experimental one-group pre-test post-test design, data were gathered through pre-tests, post-tests, and an engagement-enjoyment questionnaire. Results revealed that students' pre-test scores fell under the “developing” category, indicating a basic level of literary understanding. After implementing UDL strategies, post-test scores increased significantly, falling within the “notable positive impact” category. Statistical analysis using the paired t-test confirmed a significant difference between pre- and post-test scores at p < 0.001. Additionally, learners reported high levels of engagement and enjoyment throughout the UDL-integrated lessons. The findings suggest that UDL strategies effectively enhance literary comprehension and appreciation by making learning more accessible, inclusive, and student-centered. Instructional learning plans may therefore be developed to incorporate flexible, engaging, and meaningful literary experiences designed to diverse learners. This study supports the integration of UDL in literature instruction to foster deeper understanding and sustained motivation among senior high school students.



References:

  1. About CAST. (2024, June 20). CAST. https://www.cast.org/about/about-cast
  2. About Universal Design for Learning - CAST. (2024, October 7). CAST. https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl
  3. American University. (n.d.). What is universal design for learning? American University School of Education. Retrieved December 11, 2024, from https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/universal-design-for-learning/
  4. Bruckner, S., & Nunn, N. (2023, April 27). Universal Design for Learning: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. EDC. https://www.edc.org/blog/universal-design-learning-meeting-needs-diverse-learners
  5. Capangpangan, M. J., & Sambo, T. (2023). The use of individualized materials in relation to learners’ reading comprehension. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(10). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=20698
  6. CAST, Inc. (n.d.). About the Guidelines 3.0 update. UDL Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/about-guidelines-3-0/
  7. Center for Universal Design. (2008). About UD. North Carolina State University. http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm
  8. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Motivation and engagement in learning. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.891
  9. Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41.
  10. Espia, E. B. A., & Cortezano, G. P. (2022). Reading comprehension and academic performance in English among Grade seven learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, Special Issue, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/09498
  11. Fitria, T. N. (2022). The impact of gamification on students’ motivation: A systematic literature review. LingTera, 9(2), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v9i2.56616
  12. Grellet, F. (2004). Developing reading skills. Cambridge University Press. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Developing_Reading_Skills/ht0qOrLtuOUC?hl=id&gbpv=1
  13. Guerreiro, M., Barker, E., & Johnson, J. (2022). Measuring student reading comprehension performance: Considerations of accuracy, equity, and engagement by embedding comprehension items within reading passages. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 27(11). https://doi.org/10.7275/ch8r-tx33
  14. Hall, T. E., Robinson, K. H., & Gordon, D. (2024). Universal design for learning in the classroom. The Guilford Press.
  15. Hijastro, K. L. V. (n.d.). Utilizing local literary texts as instructional material for 21st-century Philippine literature [Unpublished manuscript]. Bukidnon State University.
  16. Lived, W. A., & Ridor-Unciano, M. J. (2022). Personal growth and development of students’ literary appreciation. The Review of Contemporary Scientific and Academic Studies, 2(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55454/rcsas.2.7.2022.003
  17. Lustyantie, N., & Aprilia, F. (2020). Reading interest and achievement motivation: A study in an EFL context. TESOL International Journal, 15(4), 147–164.
  18. Martin, A. J. (2013). Improving the achievement, motivation, and engagement of students with ADHD: The role of personal best goals and other growth-based approaches. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 23(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2013.4
  19. McLeod, S. (2024, August 5). Piaget’s theory and stages of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
  20. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
  21. Peng, C. (2021). The academic motivation and engagement of students in English as a foreign language classes: Does teacher praise matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 778174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174
  22. Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
  23. Pittaway, S., & Malomo, M. (2021). “So, you want me to read for my degree?”: A Universal Design for Learning approach to reading. Insights, 34(19), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.549
  24. Republic Act No. 11650. (n.d.). https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11650_2022.html
  25. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  26. Saffar, O. A. (2019). The effect of using universal design for learning to improve the vocational programme with intellectual disabilities and the challenges facing this method (Doctoral dissertation, University of Strathclyde).
  27. Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(45). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
  28. Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism (5th ed.). Longman.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic