HomeUniversal Journal of Educational Researchvol. 4 no. 4 (2025)

Educational Technology In English Remedial Education: How Can We Find An English Learners’ Personal Optimal Phases And Estimate Their Outcomes?

Yoshimasa Uehara

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This paper aims to evaluate and determine student outcomes from e-learning specifically in the context of remedial/developmental English education for university students in Japan. The study explores the methodology for evaluating individual competency in depth, utilizing content-based reading instruction to assess achievement and predict future reading skills. The methodology involved a case study using editor-based e-learning content implemented at University A that was not initially customized for individual optimization. Students were encouraged to study off-campus, using multimedia classrooms, and were permitted to use screenshots and digital cameras to investigate and retry content parts at their own pace. Key metrics tracked included the number of units completed, total advance points, learning hours, and the Learning Rate (calculated as Total Points divided by Total Learning Time). Results suggest that individual ability and time are closely related to the ability to finish the contents and the overall task. Analysis revealed three clusters of performance: students who took less time to finish, those who took less time but did not finish, and those who took more time to finish the contents. Since the utilized materials were not individually optimized, the paper concludes that further challenges involve developing materials and systems with a high correlation to the learning rate. Implications propose a conceptual design aimed at autonomous learning—the final purpose of remedial education—by incorporating personalized learning assessments, individual learning histories, and personalized content optimization.



References:

  1. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of E-learning managerial perspectives. 10(9), 216. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/9/216
  2. Bulter, Y. G. (2005). Content-based instruction in EFL contexts: Considerations for effective implementation. JALT Journal, 27(2), 227–245.
  3. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2006). Questions in the CLIL classroom: Strategic questioning to encourage speaking. In A. Mattinez-Flor & E. USo (Eds.), New Amsterdam (pp. 187–213). Mounton de Gruyet.
  4. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology System, 49(1), 5–22.
  5. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2017). How languages are learned. OXFORD.
  6. Mackay, B., Barkman, & Jordan, R. R. (Eds.). (n.d.). Reading in a second language: Hypotheses, organization, and practice. Newbury House. (Note: Date missing in source.)
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2007). The state of reform of educational content at universities.
  8. Rumi, M., & Hitomi, O. (2021). Factors determining success of online classes: Based on self-regulated learning and students’ characteristics. Japan Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 5–8.
  9. Tanigawa, H. (2021). Remedial education. In Japan Association of American Ecation Studies (Ed.), HANDBOOK OF MODERN AMERICAN EDUCATION (pp. 299–300). Toshin Dou, Japan.
  10. Yamada, A. institute et al. (2018). Educational effectiveness taking advantages of ICT (pp. 1–37). ISFJ.
  11. Yamaguchi, M. (1967). Systems approach of applied curriculum study. In Modern curriculum methodology (pp. 177–211). Daiichi Houki