Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 11 (2025)

Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Social Studies

Jechie P. Doria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The research study was intended to make an evaluation of the qual-ity (contents, format presentation and organization, and usability) and effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) for Secondary Social Studies teachers of secondary schools in Zone 3, Division of Zambales. The perceptions and insights were solicited from the teacher - participants. The study was conducted during the Second Quarter of the school year 2020-2021. This study employed a de-scriptive research method with the survey questionnaire as the re-search instrument. The statistical treatment of this study utilized descriptive statistical tools. ANOVA and Pearson r are the inferential statistics used.The findings of the study revealed that the quality of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) for Secondary Social Studies Program was very Satisfactory in terms of format, content and presentation and organization. However, the SLM was Satisfactory in Usability. The academic performance of the junior high school students in so-cial studies was proficient in their pre-test and advanced in the post-test. Results also revealed that there is no significant difference on the perception of the respondents to the Quality of SLM for the Sec-ondary Social Studies Program in terms of content, format, presen-tation and organization and usability. There is significant difference on the pre-test and post-test performances of the students in Social Studies (Araling Panlipunan) lessons. There is no significant rela-tionship/correlation between the Quality and Effectiveness of the Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) in terms of content, format and presentation and organization. However, there is significant rela-tionship in terms of Usability. The Social Studies teachers strongly agreed on the different teachers’ needs which should be addressed to help improve the quality, usability and effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) for Secondary Social Studies Program. A Plan/Program was developed/formulated for to further the quality, usability and effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs). It is recommended that the preparation of self-learning module (SLM) to be utilized in the next quarter or academic year, the Social Studies Teachers, Department Heads, and School Heads/Principals may de-liberate, consider and incorporate contents and activities that moti-vate the interest of the students with adequate visual contents and info graphics (Content); good quality of paper, printing and binding and durability of materials (Format); and utilization of varied and interesting sentences and paragraph structures mother tongue and/or appropriate English language (Presentation and Organiza-tion). The Social Studies Teachers, Department Heads, and School Heads/Principals may consider the Usability aspects of the self-learning module in terms of ease of usage, monitoring and evaluat-ing students’ progress, active involvement and time frame of accom-plishing the module in the preparation of SLM for the next Quar-ter/Academic Grading. They may prioritize the conduct seminar-workshop that will further discuss the different aspects/criteria of module evaluation and acquire further knowledge on the conduct of initial and final evaluation of the prepared and utilized SLMs. Pro-pose the model/plan/program to further the quality and effective-ness of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) to the Social Studies Depart-ment Heads, School Heads/Principals, Supervisors, and Education Specialist/Curriculum Planners of the Division of Zambales for fur-ther review, and future implementation.



References:

  1. Acelejado,  M.  (2016).  The  Modular  Teaching Approach  in  College  Algebra:  An  Alterna-tive to Improving the Learner’s Achieve-ment,    Persistence,    and    Confidence    in Mathematics. 2016. DLSU, Philippines.
  2.  Ahuja,  M  &  Singla,  D  (2015)  Effect  of  ability grouping   for   selflearning   modules   of Achievement   of   student   in   relation   to their  gender  and  socio  economic  status. Research  journal  social  sciences,  vol  13, No.2, PP84-102.
  3. Alavi, H., & Hoseini, A. (2018). The Effects of Ed-ucational Factors on the Academic Perfor-mance   of   the    University   Students   in Chemistry.  Chemical  Education  Journal. 2018 (13) 2, 13-14.
  4. Ali,  R.S.,  Ghazi,  S.R.,  Khan,  M.S.,  Hussain,  S.  & Faitma, Z.T. (2010). Effectiveness of Mod-ular   Teaching   in   Biology   at   Secondary Level,  Asian  Social  Sciences,  Volume  6, Number 9.
  5. Ambayon,   C.M.   (2020).   Modular-Based   Ap-proach and Students’ Achievement in Lit-erature.  International  Journal  of  Educa-tion  &  Literacy  Studies  ISSN:  2202-9478 www.ijels.aiac.org.au.
  6. Aquino-Danganan, A. (2017). Development and Validation   of   a   Module   in   Developing Computational  Skills  in  College  Algebra. Tarlac State University. 2017.
  7. Aquino-Danganan,  Aussie.  (2015)  “Develop-ment and Validation of A Module in Devel-oping  Computational  Skills  in  College  Al-gebra” Unpublished Thesis, Tarlac State University
  8. Auditor,  E.  &  Naval,  D.J.  (2014).  Development and  Validation  of  Tenth  Grade  Physics Modules  Based  on  Selected  Least  Mas-tered Competencies, International Journal of   Education   and   Research,   Volume   2, Number 12, ISSN 2201-6333, pp. 145-152.
  9. Biggs  P,  (2016).  Distance  Education  and  Im-provement  of  Curriculum,  P.G  (Pedagog-ics, Vol.Attended Workshop on “Innova-tive  Strategies  for  the  Effective  Transac-tion of instructions, pp 55-59).
  10. Brooks,  D.,  Marsh,  L.,  Wilcox,  K.,  &  Cohen,  B. (2011).  Beyond  satisfaction:  Toward  an outcomes-based, procedural model of fac-ulty   development   program   evaluation. Journal of Faculty Development, 25(3), 5-12.
  11. Bruner  (1962).  Facilitating  Learning:  a  meta-cognition process. Pp 123Catacutan,  R.A.  &  de  Guzman,  M.F.D.  (2017). The  Project-Based  Learning  (PBL)  Ap-proach  in  Secondary  Social  Studies  In-struction at Zone 2, Division of Zambales, Philippines,” International Journal of Sci-entific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 11, November-2017.
  12. Cheng, C. M & Abu Bakar, M. B. (2017). The Im-pact of Using Modules in the Teaching and Learning  of  English  in  Malaysian  Poly-technics:  An  Analysis  of  the  Views  and Perceptions  of  English  Language  Teach-ing,   Jabatan   Pengajian   Am,   Politeknik Melaka,  Jebatan  Politeknik,  Kementerian, Pendidikan, Malaysia.Costales,  J.  (2018).  Difficulties  in  performance task authentic assessment among second-ary  school  social  studies  teachers  of  zone 2,  department  of  education  division  of Zambales.  Master  of  Arts  in  Education, Major  in  Social  Studies.  Graduate  School, PRMSU,Iba, Zambales.
  13. Cunningham, D.J., Duffy T.M. & Knuth R. (2016). The    Textbook    of    the    future.    In    C. McKnight,   A.   Dillon   and   J.   Richardson (Eds.),   Hypertext:   a   psychological   per-spective. Ellis Horwood.
  14. Dangle, Y.R.P. & Sumaoang, Y.D. (2020). The Im-plementation  of  Modular  Distance  Learn-ing  in  the  Philippine  Secondary  Public Schools.  Advanced  Research  in  Teaching and Education
  15. Dejene, W. (2019). The practice of modularized curriculum  in  higher  education  institu-tion:    Active    learning    and    continuous JP Doria,2025 /Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Social StudiesIJMABER5484Volume 6| Number 11| November| 2025assessment   in   focus.   Cogent   Education (2019), 6: 1611052 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052.
  16. Department  of  Education Sulong  Edukalidad(2020).  Learning  Opportunities  shall  be Available.  The  Basic  Education  Learning Continuity Plan in the Time of COVID-19. DepEd  Memo  No.  018,  s.  2020.  Policy  Guide-lines  for  the  Provision  of  Learning  Re-sources   in   the   Implementation   of   the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan. Department of Education, Philippines.
  17. DepEd Order No. 13 (2020). Readiness Assess-ment  Checklist  for  Learning Delivery  Mo-dalities in the Learning Continuity Plan of Private Schools  DepEd Prepares Self-Learning Modules  for Ed-ucation’s New Normal. Press Release. July 1, 2020 —https://www.de-ped.gov.ph/2020/07/02/deped-pre-pares-self-learning-modules-for-educa-tions-new-normal/
  18. Donnelly  &  Fitzmaurice  (2015).  Development of  Instructional  Materials  for  Interactive Learning. 2015.
  19. Driscoll,  D.  L.  (2011).  Introduction  to  Primary Research:  Observations,  Surveys,  and  In-terviews. ISBN 978-1-60235-184-4 http://www.parlorpress.com/pdf/dris-coll--introduction-to-primary-re-search.pdf
  20. Fathurrohman,  M.  (2015).  Model-model  Pem-belajaran   Inovatif.   Yogyakarta:   Ar-Ruzz Media.
  21. Febrianti,  K.  V.,  Bakri,  F.,  &  Nasbey,  H.  (2017). Pengembangan  Modul  Digital  Fisika  ber-basis  Discovery  Learning  pada  Pokok  Ba-hasan Kinematika Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Wa-hana Pendidikan Fisika, 18-26.
  22. Gaikwad,  N.,  &  Tankhiwale,  S.  (2014).  Interac-tive  E-learning  module  in  pharmacology: a pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspectives on Medical Education.
  23. Galanida,  C.  (2016).  Development  and  Valida-tion  of  Instructional  Materials  for  Basic Mathematics.  Philippine  Normal  Univer-sity. 2016.
  24. Gallos,  M.,  Van  Den  Berg,  E.,  &  Treagust,  D. (2015).  The  Effect  of  Integrated  Courses and Faculty Development: Experiences  of a University Chemistry Department in the Philippines.  International  Journal  of  Sci-ence Education. 27 (8), 985-1006. 2015.
  25. Garillos, M. N. T. (2012). Development and Val-idation of Instructional Module in Biology for Second Year High School. TVC-Sta. Te-resa National High School. 2012.
  26. Goode, C.M (2018). Evaluating the Quality, Usa-bility,    and    Potential    Effectiveness    of Online Learning Modules: A Case Study of Teaching  with  Technology  Grant  Recipi-ents at the University of Tennessee, Knox-ville.  University  of  Tennessee,  Knoxville. December 2018.
  27. Greager,  J.  &  Murray,  D.  (2017).  The  Use  of Modules in College Teaching. Washington, D.C: Nichols Publishing Co., Inc. 2017.
  28. Guido, R. M.D, (2014). Evaluation  of a Modular Teaching  Approach  in  Materials  Science and Engineering. American Journal of Ed-ucational  Research,  2014,  Vol.  2,  No.  11, 1126-1130 Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/educa-tion/2/141/20
  29. Guillermo, R.D.S. (2018). The Effectiveness and Acceptability of “Developed Modular and Videolar Instructions” in Teaching Inter-national  General  Curriculum  Secondary Education   (IGCSE)   Mathematics   Philip-pine Christian University, June 2018.
  30. Guskey, T. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 68 (2), pp. 52-57.
  31. Hashweh,   M.,   (2020).   Pedagogical   Content Knowledge: Lee Shulman. Encyclopedia of Educational Theoryand  Philosophy. Retrieved March 8, 2020 fromhttps://sk.sagepub.com/refer-ence/encyclopedia-ofeducation-the-ory-
  32. Higgs, B. and M. McCarthy (2015). Active Learn-ing --from Lecture Theatre to Field-work.
  33. In S. Moore, G. O’Neill, and B. McMullin (Eds.),  Emerging  Issues  in  the  Practice  of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin: AISHE
  34. Hill,  M.,  Sharma,  M.  D.,  &  Johnston,  H.  (2015). How  Online  Learning  Modules  can  im-prove  the  Representational  Fluency  and Conceptual  Understanding  of  University Physics   Students.   European   Journal   of Physics.Van
  35. Hooser, T., (2010). JP Doria,2025 /Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Social StudiesIJMABER 5485Volume 6| Number 11| November | 2025Importance  of  Instructional  Materials  in Teaching   and   Learning   Integrated   Sci-ence.
  36. Hoffman,  B.  &  Ritchie,  D.  (2017).  An  Instruc-tional  Design-Based  Approach  to  Devel-oping  Online  Learning  Environments.  In B.     Kahn     (Ed.),     Web-based     Training (pp.213-218).  Englewood  Cliffs,  NJ:  Edu-cational Technology Publications.
  37. Isna,   R.,   Masykuri,  M.,  &   Sukarmin.  (2017). Achievement  of  Learning  Outcome  After Implemented  Physical  Modules  Based  on Problem Based Learning. Journal of Phys-ics: Conference Series.
  38. Jayasree P, (2017). Distance Education and Im-provement  of  Curriculum,  P.G  (Pedagog-ics, Vol.Attended Workshop on “Innova-tive  Strategies  for  the  Effective  Transac-tion of instructions, pp 55-59)
  39. Joyce,  B.,  Kalhun,  M.  &  Hapkins,  D.  (2017). Learning  models  of  teaching  instruments (Translated  by:  Mahmood  Mehrmoham-madi  and  Lotfali  Abedi).  Tehran:  SAMT. (Publication   data   in   original   language 1949).K-12   Social   Studies   Curriculum http://rex-publishing.com.ph/social-studies/
  40. Kto12 Gabay    Pangkurikulum    Araling    Pan-lipunan Baitang1–10. (2013). http://www.deped.gov.ph/sites/de-fault/files/Araling%20Pan-lipunan%20Grades%20%201-10%2001.17.2014%20ed-ited%20March%2025%202014.pdf
  41. Larawan,  L.  (2013).    Acceptability  of  Teacher-Made   Modules   in   Production   Manage-ment
  42. International  Journal  of  Managerial Studies  and  Research  (IJMSR)  Volume  1, Issue  2  (July  2013),  PP  10-22 www.arc-journals.org.
  43. Lawlor,  B.,  McLoone,  S.,  &  Meehan,  A.  (2015). Integrating  a  PBL  Pilot  Module  into  an Electronic Engineering Programme. AISHE  Academic  Practice  Guides:  An  In-troduction to Enquiry/Problembased Learning.
  44. Lim,  E.J.  (2016).  Effectiveness  of  Modular  In-struction   in   Word   Problem   Solving   of BEED  Students.  IOSR  Journal  of  Mathe-matics  (IOSR-JM).  e-ISSN:  2278-5728,  p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 12, Issue 5 Ver. VII (Sep. -Oct.2016), PP 59-65.
  45. Macarandang, M. A. (2016). Evaluation of a Pro-posed  Set  of  Modules  in  Principles  and Method  of  Teaching.  E-International  Sci-entific Research Journal, 1, 1-24. 2016.
  46. Mahmood,  K.  (2016).  Textbook  Evaluation  in Pakistan:  Issue  of  Conformity  to  the  Na-tional  Curriculum  Guidelines.  Bulletin  of Education and Research, 32, 15-36. 2016.
  47. Malik,  K.  (2012).  Effects  of  modular  and  tradi-tional  approaches  on  students’  general comprehension.  Elixir  Social  Studies,  42, 6228–6231.
  48. Manlangit,  P.,  Paglumotan,  A.M.  &  Sapera,  S.  C. (2020).  Supercharging Filipino Parents is Key    for    Successful    Modular    Distance Learning, Published on October 5, 2020
  49. Michelle, W., Nancy, M., & Candace, H. L. (2012). Undergraduates   and   academic   dishon-esty. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (1), 341–367.
  50. Moharam. A. (2018). Guidance to new teaching methods. Tehran: Ayij publication.National  Council  for  the  Social  Studies  (2010). Building social understanding and civic ef-ficacy.   Retrieved   from   www.socialstud-ies.org/positions/Social understanding.
  51. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard T, LoContePadmapriya  P.V  (2015).  Effectiveness  of  Self Learning  Modules  on  Achievement  in  Bi-ology  among  Secondary  School  Students. International   Journal   of   Education   and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2015.
  52. Pasigui,  R.E.  &  Cabalu,  D.H.  (2016).  Jose  Rizal: The  Man  and  the  Hero  (An  Anthology  of Legacies  and  Controversies).  C  &  E  Pub-lishing, Inc., Quezon City.
  53. Postholm, M.B. (2018). Teachers’ professional development  in  school:  A  review  study. Postholm,  Teacher  Education  &  Develop-ment     Cogent     Education     (2018),     5: 1522781 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1522781.
  54. Reigeluth,  C.  M.  (2018).  Instructional  design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),  Instructional  design  theories  and JP Doria,2025 /Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Social StudiesIJMABER5486Volume 6| Number 11| November| 2025models: An  overview of their current sta-tus (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
  55. Reyes,  Y.  D.,  &  De  Guia,  R.  G.  (2017).  Develop-ment  of  English  worktext  in  English  101. International  Journal  of  Science  and  Re-search   (IJSR).   Retrieved   from   https://pdfs.seman-ticscholar.org/835/259b5c0183ff5f354a85f91ab1199d5fcab2.pdf
  56. Richards,   J.   (2013).   Advantages   and   disad-vantages  of  using  instructional  materials in teaching ESL. Retrieved from https://www.professorjackrich-ards.com/advantages-and-disad-vantages-of-using-instructional-materi-als-in-teaching-esl/
  57. Rio, L.C. (2014). International Journal  of Scien-tific and Research Publications, Volume 4, Issue 10, October 2014 1 ISSN 2250-3153 www.ijsrp.org Development and Accepta-bility   of   Training   Module   in   Switching Logic.
  58. Rion, L.C. (2014). Development and Acceptabil-ity of Training Module in Switching Logic, International Journal  of Scientific and Re-search  Publications,  Volume  4,  Issue  10, pp. 1-9.
  59. Sadiq,  S.  (2016).  Effectiveness  of  Modular  Ap-proach  in  Teaching  at  University  Level Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org   ISSN   2222-1735   (Paper) ISSN   2222-288X   (Online)   Vol.5,   No.17, 2016.
  60. Salcedo  J.R.E.E.  (2017).  Acceptability  of  a  De-veloped   Teaching   Module   on   Selected Writings of Jose Rizal. SAJST, Volume 1, Is-sue  1,  2016  P-ISSN:  2672-2984  E-ISSN: 2672-2992 www.sajst.org
  61. Sanz, I., Sáinz, J.,  & Capilla,  A. (2020). Effects of the  coronavirus  crisis  on  education  .  Ma-drid:    Organization    of    Ibero-American
  62. States  for  Education,  Science  and  Culture (OEI).Hyler & Gardner (2017)
  63. Sarmiento, A.P. (2020). MSCrim Learning Mod-ules:  A  Self-learning  Kit  in  Criminology http://www.rkmfiles.net/criminology-articles/44-learning-modules-a-self-learning-kit-in-criminology.html
  64. Scott, B. (2012). The effectiveness of differenti-ated instruction in the elementary mathe-matics  classroom.  Dissertation  Advisor. Ball   State   University   Muncie,   Indiana. March 2012.
  65. Seco-Macarandan,  R.M.  (2014).  Assessment  of the Araling Panlipunan Modules in the K-12   Curriculum:   Enhanced   Instructional Materials Development, International Conference on Economics, Social Sciences and Languages.
  66. Sejpal, K. (2013).  Modular method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Edu-cation, 2(2), 169-171.
  67. Sejpal,  K.  (2016).  The  Development  of  Exper-tise in Pedagogy. The Charles W. Hunt Me-morial  Lecture  for  the  American  Associa-tion  of  Colleges  for  Teacher  Education, New Orleans, LA, February 2016.
  68. Selga,  M.  C.  R.  (2013).  Instructional  materials development:    A    worktext    in    Science, Technology  and  Society.  LCCB  Develop-ment  Education  Journal  of  Multidiscipli-nary  Research,  2(1),  1-1.  Retrieved  from http://lcc.edu.ph/ assets/images/re-search/pdf
  69. Serevina, V., Sunaryo, Raihanati, Astra, & Sari, I. (2018).  Development  of  E-Module  Based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Heat and Temperature to Improve Student’s Science Process Skill.
  70. Shurygin,  V.  Y.,  &  Krasnova,  L.  A.  (2016).  Elec-tronic Learning Courses as a Means to Ac-tivate   Students'   Independent   Work   in Studying Physics. International Journal  of Environmental and Science Education.
  71. Stevenson,  W.  (2017).  Production/Operations Management, 10th ed. New York: McGrawHill/Irwin.
  72. Stockwell,  B.  R.,  Stockwell,  M.  S.,  Cennamo,  M., &  Jiang,  E.  (2015).  Blended  Learning  Im-proves Science Education. Cell, 162(5).
  73. Struyven,  K.,  Dochy,  F.,  &  Janssens,  S.  (2012). ‘Teach as you preach’: The effects of stu-dent-centred  versus  lecture-based  teach-ing on student teachers’ approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Ed-ucation,     33(1),     43–64.     doi:10.1080/ 02619760903457818.JP Doria,2025 /Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Social StudiesIJMABER 5487Volume 6| Number 11| November | 2025
  74. Sujatha, J.D, & Gowri, A.R (2015). Effectiveness of  modular  packages  in  teaching  Biology, edutracks, Vol 8(3) P-36-38.
  75. Tabotabo, C.V. & Leaño, R.D. (2015). Jose Rizal: A Hero’s Life. Mindshapers Co., Inc., Ma-kati City.
  76. Tan-Espinar,  M.  J.  F.,  &  Ballado,  R.  S.  (2017). Content Validity and Acceptability of a De-veloped Worktext in Basic Mathematics 2. Asia  Pacific  Journal  of  Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.academia. edu/down-load/53076478/APJMR-2017.5.1.10.pdf
  77. Tullis, J. & Benjamin, A. (2011). On the effective-ness   of   self-paced   learning.   Journal   of Memory  and  Language,  64  (2),  pp.  109-118.USAID    Teacher    Education    Project    (2012).
  78. Teaching  Social  Studies -II  (Teaching  So-cial  Studies  Pedagogy  Option)  Windows on  Practice  Guide  B.Ed.  (Hons.)  Elemen-tary  2012.  Higher  Education  Commission http://www.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divi-sions/AECA/CurriculumRevision/Docu-ments/TeachingSocStudies2_Sept13.pdf
  79. Vergara,  A.M.  (2017).  Development,  Effective-ness  and  Acceptability  of  Module  for  the Problem   Solving   and   Critical   Thinking Skills  of  Alternative  Learning  System  in District of Tanay II. Tomas Claudio Memo-rial College, Morong, Rizal.
  80. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the De-velopment of Higher Psychological Processes.  Cambridge,  MA:  Harvard  Uni-versity Press.
  81. Vygotsky,  L.  S.  (1997).  The  Historical  Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodolog-ical Investigation. In The Collected Works of  L.  S.  Vygotsky.  Vol.  3.      Problems  of  the Theory  and  History  of  Psychology  (pp. 233-344). R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
  82. Yazon,  A.D.  (2017).  Validation  and  Effective-ness of Module in Assessment of Students Learning. International Journal of  Science and  Research  (IJSR)  ISSN:  2319-7064  In-dex Copernicus Value (2016): 79.57 | Im-pact Factor (2017): 7.296.
  83. Yoseph, G.,  & Mekuwanint, T. (2015).  The suit-ability  of  the  modular  curriculum  to  of-fer/learn  skill in EFL undergraduate clas-ses.  International  Journal  of  Current  Re-search, 7(4), 14686–14696, 2015.
  84. Yulianti,  D.  (2017).  Problem-Based  Learning Model  Used  to  Scientific  Approach  Based Worksheet  for  Physics  to  Develop  Senior High  School  Students  Characters.  Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
  85. Zhu,  X  &  Liu,  J.  (2020).  Education  in  and  After Covid-19:    Immediate    Responses     and Long-Term  Visions  Beijing  Normal  Uni-versity, Beijing, China. Postdigital Science and Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic