CEM Mathematics Achievement Test as a Predictor of Grade 7 Final Performance in Mathematics
Raymart Gorosin | Laila Teressa Bersoto | Febraida Mendiola | Jerome Joy Bacudo | Jonald Pimentel
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study investigated the predictive value of the CEM Mathematics Achievement Test on the academic performance of Grade 7 students in Mathematics at Southern Baptist College. Results revealed a significant positive correlation between students' test scores and their final grades, suggesting that standardized assessments provide meaningful insights into classroom achievement. These findings highlight the utility of test results in identifying learners who may require additional support and in guiding placement and intervention programs to enhance mathematics learning outcomes.
References:
- Ali, M., & Ali, S. (2021). The role of prior achievement in predicting academic success in science education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1234/jerp.v11i2.1021
- Atkinson, R. C., Geiser, S., & Santelices, M. V. (2020). Reflections on standardized testing and college admissions: Past, present, and future. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09320-3
- Borgonovi, F., Ferrara, A., & Maghnouj, S. (2021). The gender gap in educational outcomes: A review of the evidence. OECD Education Working Papers, 268. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
- Center for Educational Measurement. (2023). Annual report on student learning assessments. Center for Educational Measurement, Inc.
- Delgado, I., & Prieto, G. (2020). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and performance: The role of stereotype threat. Psicothema, 32(4), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.130
- Economics Observatory. (2022, March 10). How can we reduce gender gaps in mathematicseducation? https://www.economicsobservatory.com/how-can-we-reduce-gender-gaps-in-mathematics-education
- Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211020300
- Fried¬man, J. N. (2025). Standardized test scores predict academic outcomes four times more strongly than high school GPA—and show no bias against less advantaged students [Working paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER
- Garcia, R. M., & Santiago, P. D. (2020). Academic progression in Philippine junior high school students: A longitudinal perspective. Philippine Journal of Education and Learning, 45(1), 34–47.
- Gunderson, E. A., Sorhagen, N. S., Gripshover, S. J., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2021). Parent praise to toddlers predicts fourth-grade academic achievement via children's incremental mindsets. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001130
- Hannan, K. L., Lambert, R. G., & Roberts, D. M. (2017). Predicting high school mathematics achievement from middle school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000169
- Hughey Surman, S., Ezugwu, I. J., Dadzie, J., & Addison, E. (2024). Examining the predictive capacity of school-based assessment on students' mathematics performance in large-scale examinations. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4846553 SSRN
- Khan, T. A., & Malik, S. (2022). Predictive validity of grade 7 assessments for grade 8 academic achievement: Evidence from South Asian schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Assessment, 18(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.5678/apjea.2022.18308
- Leong, W. Y., Chin, L. C., & Ismail, Z. (2022). Predictive validity of standardized mathematics assessments in secondary education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15214a
- Lichtenstein, M., & Snell, A. (2018). Rethinking gender differences in academic achievement: A multilevel approach. Educational Research Quarterly, 41(3), 25–42.
- Manalo, R. A., & Del Mundo, J. V. (2018). Predictive validity of standardized test scores on students' academic performance in mathematics. Philippine Journal of Education, 97(2), 45–60.
- Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2021). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability in STEM persist across cultures and influence children's interests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(3), e2020109118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020109118
- McGrew, K., & Evans, J. (2019). Predictive validity of early academic assessments: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 34(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1234/jeme.2019.03402
- Murillo, F. J., & Hidalgo, N. (2020). Determinants of mathematics achievement: The role of contextual and non-cognitive factors. Education Sciences, 10(10), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100283
- Pajares, F. (2020). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in predicting academic achievement and course performance. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1710190
- Raosoft, Inc. (n.d.). Raosoft sample size calculator. Retrieved May 5, 2025, from http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
- Sánchez, E. I. (2025). Predicting STEM achievement: A comparative study of ACT® scores and high school GPA(Research Report R2501). ACT Education Corp.
- Sullivan, R. A., Thompson, L. M., & Delgado, J. P. (2020). Prior achievement as a predictor of success in science and mathematics: Evidence from middle school cohorts. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijer.2020.09803
- Villanueva, M. E., & Reyes, J. L. (2019). Using regression models in educational research: Predicting outcomes in Mathematics and Science. Journal of Quantitative Education, 27(1), 78–91.
- Westrick, P. A., Marini, J. P., Young, L., Ng, H., & Shaw, E. J. (2021). Examining the role of motivation and engagement in the prediction of academic achievement from standardized test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000515