Mountain as Memory and Meaning: A Semiotic Reading of the Ilongot Tales (Dimolat)
Fritzie Sison | Augusto Antonio A. Aguila
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
The Ilongots and their oral literature play a significant role in Philippine culture and the identity of Filipinos; however, there is a dearth of documentation and critical analysis of their literature, such as their tales or dimolat. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the semiotics of the collected Ilongot folktales, or dimolat, by Laurence L. Wilson. Specifically, it sought to answer how the collected tales can be read in terms of their narrative structure and how the signs and symbols interpret the concept of the mountain, as expressed both implicitly and explicitly in the collected tales. Qualitative research employing critical analysis was used. The 22 Ilongot tales were mapped out according to the narrative functions and character roles as outlined by Vladimir Propp, Greimas's Actantial Model, and Roland Barthes's semiotic approach. Findings revealed that the tales conformed to a universal narrative structure but showed cultural specificity. Propp's character roles and Greimas's Actantial Model suggest that Ilongot stories feature the archetypal hero, helper, donor, and opponent; however, the opponents in the tales are not always individuals, but also abstract forces such as famine, fear, hunger, or death. Semiotic analysis further revealed that the concept of the mountain, as expressed in the tales, can be interpreted as a cradle of life, refuge, protection, provider, sustenance, sacred space, a site of isolation and testing, and keeper of cultural memory. The study concludes that the collected Ilongot tales serve not only as entertainment but as vessels of ancestral wisdom, moral education, and identity preservation. The mountain, both implicitly and explicitly expressed in these stories, symbolizes the Ilongot people's inseparable bond with their environment, history, and community. Future studies may employ different lenses to analyze the same collection and may also utilize the same methodology to explore other regional literatures, thereby understanding Filipino identity, preserving, and appreciating the literary pieces of their chosen ethnic group.
References:
- Aubrey, J. (1696). Miscellanies. London: Edward Castle.
- Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, music, text (11th ed., pp.3251). London, UK: Fontana Press.
- Bautista, M. A. (1994). Literaturang pambayan ng mga Gaddang, Isinay, at Ilongot ng Nueva Vizcaya: Pagtitipon, pagsasalin at pagbasang kontekstuwal. De La Salle University.
- Bayliss, C. K. (1908). Philippine folktales. American Folklore Society. http://www.jstor.org/stable/534529
- Bascom, W. R. (1954). Four functions of literature. The Journal of American Folklore, 67(266), 333–349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/536411
- Brand, J. (1977). Observations on the popular antiquities of Great Britain (Reprint ed.). London: Centaur Press.
- Bugkalot Confederation. (2016). Background & beginnings. https://bugkalot-tribe.com/about-us/background-beginnings/
- Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among four approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Cole, M. C. (1916). Philippine folk tales. Chicago, IL: A. C. McClurg & Company
- Dundes, A. (1965). The study of folklore. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Eugenio, D. L. (1985). Philippine folklore and nationalism. In Proceedings of the 2nd National Symposium on Philippine Folklore. University of the Philippines.
- Eugenio, D. L. (2007). Philippine folk literature an anthology (Second ed.). The University of the Philippines Press.
- Gardner, F. (1907, June). Tagalog folk-tales. American Folklore Society. Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/534654
- Greimas, J.A. (1983). Structural semantics: an attempt at a method. University of Nebraska Press.
- Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (2003). Grimm's fairy tales (M. Hunt, Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.
- Lumbera, B. L. (2001). Tagalog poetry 1570-1898: Tradition and influences in its development. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
- Manuel, E. A. (2000). Manuvu social organization. The University of the Philippines Press.
- Mojares, R. B. (2006). Waiting for Mariang Makiling: Essays in Philippine culture. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
- Nieva, L. (2013). Osipon: The Partido oral narrative tradition. Naga City: Ateneo de Naga University Press.
- Omura M. (2008). Traditional institutions and sustainable livelihood: Evidence from upland agricultural communities in the Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277064058
- Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. University of Texas Press.
- Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). Knowledge and passion: Ilongot notions of self and social life. Cambridge University Press.
- Rosaldo, R. (1980). Ilongot headhunting 1883-1974: A study in society and history. Stanford University Press.
- Salgado, P. V. O.P. (1994). The Ilongots 1591-1994. Lucky Press, Inc.
- Thoms, W. J. (1846, August 22). Letter to the editor. The Athenaeum, issue No. 982, pp. 862–863.
- Wilson, L. (1967). Ilongot life and legends. Bookman, Inc.
- Yang, S. (2011). Headhunting, Christianity, and history among Bugkalot (Ilongot) of Northern Luzon, Philippines. Philippine Studies, 59(2), 189-212.
Philippine E-Journals
