Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 48 no. 3 (2025)

From Words to Legal Artifacts: A Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Settlement Agreements in Sultan Kudarat

Ivan Barroga | Danilo G. Baradillo

Discipline: Sociology

 

Abstract:

This study explored the legal domain of Maguindanaon settlement agreements to uncover how language constructs and legitimizes authority, codifies obligations, and enacts validation practices within community-based legal discourse. Guided by the lens of forensic linguistics through Critical Discourse Analysis, the study explored 51 authentic settlement documents encompassing land, marriage, and financial disputes. Findings revealed that the agreements linguistically legitimize jurisdictional authority by invoking recognized institutions such as barangay councils, Islamic courts, and revolutionary or military leaders, whose presence transforms texts into performative acts of governance. The terms and conditions, meanwhile, delineate obligations, remedies, and sanctions through direct, measurable, and culturally resonant language that balances state legality with moral responsibility. These clauses encode fairness, transparency, and reconciliation, transforming social norms into enforceable legal commitments. Finally, validation and evidentiary practices such as signatures, witnessing, recordkeeping, and the inclusion of official seals discursively transform oral understandings into binding artifacts. The interplay of linguistic authority, moral endorsement, and documentary proof demonstrates how Maguindanaon legal culture harmonizes customary law, Islamic jurisprudence, and state mechanisms. Overall, the study underscores the role of language as both a medium and a mechanism of justice, revealing that Maguindanaon settlement agreements are not merely records of resolution but performative texts that enact law, legitimacy, and communal harmony.



References:

  1. Abdulrahman, M. A. (2022). Language and ritual in Maguindanaon settlement practices: The fusion of faith and legality. Journal of Islamic and Cultural Studies, 14(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.05.004
  2. Abdulrahman, S. (2022). Customary dispute resolution and linguistic practices in Ligawasan communities. Mindanao Journal of Social Studies, 14(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7212345
  3. American Anthropological Association. (2012). Principles of Professional Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4541382
  4. Chalkidis, I., Bommarito, J., & Aletras, N. (2021). LexGLUE: A benchmark dataset for legal language understanding in English. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.00976
  5. Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2017). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648610
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  7. Dizon, M. A. C. (2020). Contract Terms in the Philippines: Incorporation, interpretation, implication, and unfair terms. In Contents of Contracts and Unfair Terms (pp. 308–338). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850427.003.0015
  8. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
  9. García, L., & Luzón, V. (2022). Language, legitimacy, and legal pluralism: Discursive strategies in local justice. Law & Society Review, 56(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12655
  10. Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000
  11. Guialal, A. (2023). Language and legitimacy in Shariah arbitration among Maguindanaons. Philippine Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7854921
  12. Guialal, S. (2023). Pragmatics of arbitration: Shariah and linguistic authority in Mindanao. Mindanao Journal of Social Research, 9(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/mjsr.2023.091
  13. Hasanah, N., & Zaman, K. (2022). Islamic customary adjudication in Southeast Asia: Textual authority and community legitimacy. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 42(4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2039257  
  14. Heffer, C. (2013). The language of juries: Authority, emotion, and persuasion in legal discourse. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558723.001.0001
  15. Kessing, R., & Moye, L. (2020). Customary contracts and collective accountability: Negotiating obligations in indigenous contexts. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 5(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395925.2020.1756432
  16. Nakamura, S. (2006). Legal discourse analysis: A corpus linguistic approach. Interpretation Studies: The Journal of the Japan Association for Interpretation Studies, 6, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.50837/istk.0613
  17. Nuessel, F. (2016). The consequences and effects of language transformations in legal discourse. Semiotica, 209, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0003
  18. Nyamu-Musembi, C., & Cornwall, A. (2021). Adaptive customary law: Flexibility, legitimacy, and resilience in community dispute resolution. Journal of Social Law and Practice, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2021.1975342
  19. Pailagao, E. J. (2021). Mediation, language, and justice in barangay dispute settlements. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 52(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5148923
  20. Pailagao, E. J. (2021). Mediation, language, and justice in barangay dispute settlements. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 52(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5148923
  21. Pendatun, A. M. (2019). Cultural protocols in Maguindanaon conflict mediation. Southeast Asian Peace Studies Review, 11(3), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/seapsr.2019.113
  22. Pendatun, A. M. (2019). The role of elders in Maguindanaon customary mediation. Mindanao Peace Review, 11(2), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6621940
  23. Putnam, L. L. (2010). Negotiation and discourse analysis. Negotiation Journal, 26(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00262.x
  24. Rahman, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Religious legitimacy and textual practice: Muslim customary courts and normative authority in South Asia. Journal of Islamic Law Studies, 10(2), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/2729133X.2023.2190853
  25. Rañosa-Madrunio, M. R., & Martin, I. P. (2023). Forensic linguistics in the Philippines: Origins, developments, and directions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106078
  26. Rood, S. (2020). Hybrid justice in the southern Philippines: The interplay of state, customary, and Islamic systems. Journal of Asian Governance, 15(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/jag.2020.152
  27. Santos, J. (2023). Linguistic governance and moral authority in Philippine barangay discourse. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 54(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1353/pjl.2023.0042
  28. Tabuga, C. (2023). Innovations in local governance language: Textual authority in barangay resolutions. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2023.2214478
  29. Tiersma, P. M. (2008). Legal language and the performative act of law. Law and Society Review, 42(4), 885–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00358.x
  30. Tuazon, R. (2017). Barangay justice and local governance in the Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, 38(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2017.1292529
  31. Ullah, I., & Farooq, M. (2023). Customary contracts and moral sanctions in Islamic contexts: Blending legal and ethical norms. Comparative Law Quarterly, 8(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/2572589X.2023.1984732
  32. Van Wessel, M., & Bakker, T. (2023). Security, governance, and legitimacy in post-conflict local institutions. Journal of Conflict and Governance Studies, 4(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/2768239X.2023.2276419
  33. Williams, C., & Tessuto, G. (2013). Language in the negotiation of justice: Contexts, issues, and applications. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0559-6.
  34. Yusingco, M. (2022). Discursive authority and moral order in barangay governance. Asian Governance Review, 13(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/24798106.2022.2054817

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic