Socioeconomic Factors as Perceived by Stakeholders in Kaatuan Elementary School

Edna  Curayag,; Glendel  Velasco,

Socioeconomic Factors as Perceived by Stakeholders in Kaatuan Elementary School

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

Educational attainment in rural Philippine communities is often shaped by intertwined socioeconomic conditions and cultural expectations that either support or hinder students’ learning. This qualitative study examined these influences in Barangay Kaatuan, where economic disadvantage, varying parental education levels, and traditional norms impact children’s educational opportunities and aspirations. Guided by an interpretivist paradigm, the research employed semi-structured interviews with nine purposively selected participants—three parents, three teachers, and three students—and applied Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. Three major themes emerged: Family Income, Parental Education Levels, and Cultural Norms. Family income determined access to transportation, school supplies, and meals, directly affecting attendance and engagement. Parental education shaped the quality of home-based support, while cultural norms influenced the value placed on schooling and long-term aspirations. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting how socioeconomic disadvantage and cultural expectations converge to influence education in a small rural setting in Mindanao. Findings underscore the need for holistic, community-based interventions, such as financial assistance programs, parental capacity-building, and culturally responsive teaching. These insights carry practical implications for policymakers and educators seeking to design contextually relevant strategies that promote educational equity in disadvantaged rural schools.

References:

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2022). Socioeconomic disparities and their impact on student engagement and learning continuity: A cross-country comparative analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102030
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4^th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fan, W., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Li, X., Chen, Y., & Zhao, L. (2023). Family support and culturally responsive pedagogy as determinants of student persistence in rural schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i2989
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3^rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4^th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2^nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6^th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhang, W., & Huang, J. (2024). The role of cultural values in educational motivation: Implications for inclusive learning in rural Asia. Journal of Comparative Education Research, 56(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.1189092