HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 50 no. 5 (2025)

Elementary Science Educators' Confidence and Expectations in Culturally Responsive Teaching

Christian Paul Lasconia

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This descriptive-correlational study examined the self-confidence and expectations regarding culturally responsive teaching (CRT) among elementary science educators, addressing a gap in research on elementary educators' selfconfidence in teaching CRT and the outcomes associated with it in the Philippine setting. CRT is a method of teaching that utilizes diverse funds of knowledge embedded within a culture, the totality of existing events observed by students, and ways in which students learn and apply skills seamlessly, drawing on their rich backgrounds. This method helped students feel welcomed and at ease in schools and is best suited to the Philippine context, given that students came from culturally and ethnically diverse backgrounds. A total of 106 elementary educators who taught science were selected as the sample and participated in the quantitative survey, which included a 40-item researcher-developed questionnaire. Means as well as standard deviations were employed for descriptive analyses, while the inferential data employed the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. Results revealed that elementary educators teaching science had remarkably high confidence (M = 4.63; SD = .41) in their ability to create an effective learning process that employs CRT as they implement science instruction. They also had exceptionally high outcome expectations (M = 4.74; SD = .40) that using CRT can create an enjoyable and accommodating classroom, and increase students' performance. There is a positive relationship between CRT self-confidence and CRT outcome expectations (r = 0.404), and these beliefs are moderately correlated with one another. Findings suggested that only (r2=0.163) of the CRT outcome expectations were predictable by their CRT self-confidence. The elementary science educators' CRT selfconfidence alone was a moderate predictor of CRT outcome expectations. Further study is encouraged to determine other variables that may serve as accurate predictors of CRT expectation.



References:

  1. Abdalla, H., & Moussa, A. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching: Navigating models and implementing effective strategies. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 3(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v3i2.432
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
  3. Caingcoy, M., & Ramirez, I. A. (2022). Assessing practice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching: The role of gender and degree programs in competence development. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4229303
  4. Cruz, R., Manchanda, S., & Firestone, A. (2019). An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. The Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419875194
  5. Department of Education. (2011b). National indigenous peoples education policy framework. DepEd Order No. 62 s 2011.
  6. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  7. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  8. Ituma, M. G. (2025). The use of differentiated instruction to achieve culturally responsive teaching. Open Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 1–234. https://doi.org/10.31586/ojer.2025.1234
  9. Kehl, J., Ott, P. K., Schachner, M., & Civitillo, S. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching in question: A multiple case study examining the complexity and interplay of teacher practices, beliefs, and microaggressions in Germany. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104772
  10. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  11. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.
  12. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Fighting for our lives: Preparing teachers to teach African American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 206–214.
  13. Larkin, D. B., Carletta, L., & Evans, S. (2022). A longitudinal investigation of changing conceptions about teaching science and pedagogical implications of student diversity. Science Education, 106(2), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21695
  14. Mercado, M. G. M. (2021). Culturally responsive curriculum: A case study of IP school in the Philippines. Journal of Community Development Research, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14456/jcdr-hs.2021.21
  15. Mohd Isa, I., Bunyamin, M. A. H., & Phang, F. (2022). Bridging culture and science education: Implications for research and practice. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.20
  16. Naik, A., Baker, S., & Mohiyeddini, C. (2023, October 23). What is culture? Frontiers for Young Minds, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2023.1150335
  17. Ogodo, J. A. (2024). Culturally responsive pedagogical knowledge: An integrative teacher knowledge base for diversified STEM classrooms. Education Sciences, 14(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020124
  18. Prayitno, H., Cahyo, D., Rasinus, S., Sulaiman, F., & Rosita, R. (2024). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Promoting inclusivity and equity in the classroom. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(3), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i3.118
  19. Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
  20. Smith, T., Avraamidou, L., & Adams, J. D. (2022). Culturally relevant/responsive and sustaining pedagogies in science education: Theoretical perspectives and curriculum implications. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17, 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10082-4.
  21. Young, J. R., Young, J. L., Fox, B. L., Levingston, E. R., Jr., & Tholen, A. (2019). We would if we could: Examining culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy in a middle school mathematics methods course. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15760/nwjte.2019.14.1.3