Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 50 no. 9 (2025)

Role of Digital Tools and Administrative Efficiency in Basic Education: A Basis for Tech-Driven Administrative Optimization Training Plan

Mary Rose Presbitero | Daisy Obiso

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the correlation between digital tool usage and administrative efficiency among administrators and teachers using a convergent parallel design. Quantitative analysis through multiple and multivariate multiple regression revealed significant models: digital tool usage explained 41.2% of the variance (Adjusted R² = .389), and administrative efficiency explained 39.6% (Adjusted R² = .373). Combined analysis indicated predictors significantly accounted for variance across both outcomes, Wilks’ Λ = 0.672, F(10, 226) = 4.94, p < .001, partial η² = .179. Among demographics, Position/Rank, Years of Experience, and Training Attended emerged as significant factors. Even when controlling for these, strong correlations persisted: digital tool usage (p = .001), administrative efficiency (p = .001), and group membership effects (p = .001), leading to the rejection of HO1, HO2, and HO3. Qualitative content analysis highlighted both enabling and constraining factors, including: Infrastructure and Access; Training and Digital Literacy; Perceived Usefulness; Time and Workload; Resistance and Attitudes; Demographics and Adoption; Training as a Mediator; Reliability and Motivation; Role-Specific Tool Relevance; and Feedback Loop. Triangulation through meta-inference confirmed parallel relationships across quantitative and qualitative findings, underscoring the central role of digital tools in shaping efficiency outcomes. It recommends developing and implementing a Tech-Driven Administrative Optimization Training Plan to address skill gaps, strengthen digital literacy, and institutionalize the effective use of technology in school management.



References:

  1. Abdul Rauf, A., Mahmud, R., & Nor, M. Z. (2023). Performance expectancy and digital adoption in public education institutions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 18–29.
  2. Adiele, E. E., & Etamesor, U. M. (2024). Digitalizing the management of primary education for efficiency in school administration. https://journals.aemapp.org/index.php/JAEMAPP/article/view/307
  3. Agarwal, V., Verma, P., & Ferrigno, G. (2025). Education 5.0 challenges and sustainable development goals in emerging economies: A mixed method approach. Technology in Society, 81, 102814.
  4. Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
  5. Ali, S., & Arshad, M. (2021). School leaders’ acceptance of digital technologies: Application of UTAUT model.Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(6), 870–887.
  6. Atief Aisyil Wi’am, Nurul Yaqien, & Teguh Triwiyanto. (2024). The management role of school administrative personnel in improving operational efficiency. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies, 0(4), 79–85. https://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/pses/article/view/9490
  7. Awamrah, A., & Rania Sawalhi. (2025). Digital School Leadership in Jordanian Public Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2549332
  8. Badawy, I., Al, M., Asma, Saad, & Katheeri, A. (2024). Transforming Education Through Technology and School Leadership. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch013
  9. Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, 2(3392). https://doi.org/10.20935/al3392
  10. Bantaculo, D. (2024). Enhancing administrative efficiency: A study on utilization of ICT in school offices. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024(10), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14064352
  11. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(7321–7338). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
  12. Bautista, A. G., Castillo, M. L., & Reyes, D. P. (2022). Digital transformation in Philippine schools: Opportunities and challenges. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(2), 233–245.
  13. Besekar, S., Jogdand, S., & Naqvi, W. (2024, May 7). Exploring sample size determination in educational research: A comprehensive review. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141173.3
  14. Bhandari, P. (2021, March 1). Control variables | What are they and why do they matter? Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/control-variable/
  15. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning
  16. Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2023: Revised guidelines on the implementation of the DepEd Computerization Program (DCP).
  17. Fatoni, M. H., Fatimah, M., Santoso, B., & Syarifuddin, H. (2024). The Role Of School Administration In Improving Operational Effectiveness And Quality Of Education. International Journal Of Educatio Elementaria And Psychologia, 1(6), 335–345.
  18. Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage, Newbury Park. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenced=3504991
  19. Finch, W. H. (2019). Using fit statistic differences to determine the optimal number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769
  20. Garcia, J., & de Guzman, A. (2020). User-friendliness and adoption of digital tools in basic education. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(2), 45–58.
  21. Himang, C. M., Cernias III, R., Corbes, R. U., Alicer, M. J. M., Colobong, B., Olarte, J. M., Ocampo, L., Bongo, M. F., & Ancheta Jr., R. (2023). Modelling the utilization of digital technology in education during the COVID-19 pandemic through an expert-based analytic tool. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.326053
  22. Jabr, F. (2023). John A. Long – Publications list. Publicationslist.org, 14(6).
  23. Jones, L., & Kennedy, E. (2022). Effective Technology Tools for School Leadership. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003269472
  24. Jung, J., Choi, S., & Fanguy, M. (2024). Exploring teachers’ digital literacy experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(2), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i2.7572
  25. Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2020). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102949
  26. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure:
  27. Krisada Prachumrasee, Panpun Ronghanam, Kasipat Thonmanee, Pakpoom Phonsungnoen, Pathompohn Mangma, Prasongchai Setthasuravich, & Grichawat Lowatcharin. (2024). From traditional to digital: Transforming local administrative organization workflows in Thailand through social listening tools. Social Sciences, 13(12), 666–666. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13120666
  28. Lorenzo, D. (2025). Balancing Progress to Equity: The Philippines’ K-12 Education Digitaliza-tion Transition During Post-Pandemic Recovery. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 6(5), 2424–2442. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.05.25
  29. Mahfud Heru Fatoni, Meti Fatimah, Santoso, B., & Hamid Syarifuddin. (2024). The role of school administration in improving operational effectiveness and quality of education. International Journal of Educatio Elementaria and Psychologia, 1(6), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijeep.v1i6.1400
  30. ManueI, J., & Alon, R. (2024). Creating a digital culture in schools: The role of leadership in technology integration. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 12(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.12257
  31. Murat Doğan. (2025). The Adoption Process of Blockchain Technology Among Social Media Influencers. IEEE Access, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3583547
  32. Official Gazette. (1987). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.
  33. Ofori-Kyereh, B., & Agyei, D. D. (2022). UTAUT-based study of school administrative technology use in Ghana. African Journal of Educational Management, 20(3), 101–117.
  34. Pahayahay, A. (2025). Enhancing collaboration through Google Workspace: Assessing and strengthening current practices. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.235
  35. Pitogo, N. S. (2024). Enhancing Administrative Efficiency Through the DepEd Caraga Regional Office Information Systems Portal. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 8, 2822–2840. https://stepacademic.net/ijcsr/article/view/517
  36. Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/productfiles/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
  37. Polinio, K. V. L. S., Los Baños, Q. D., Pugoy, R. A., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2023). Digital transformation on administrative efficiency in public schools. Central Mindanao University.
  38. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144(1), 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
  39. Rodriguez, M. R. G. (2021). Technology leadership: Assessing the competency level of high school administrators and teachers in the use of ICTs. Journal of Educational Management & Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.48112/jemss.v1i1.227
  40. Scherer, R., Siddiq,  F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  41. Smith, J. A. (2024). Qualitative Psychology : A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Www.torrossa.com, 1–100. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5730629
  42. Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2023). Systematic review ondigital transformation among teachers in publicschools. Journal of Educational Technology, 6(3), 45-58
  43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.      https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3132273
  44. Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
  45. Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
  46. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342513144_Should_Teachers_be_Trained_in_Emergency_Remote_Teaching_Lessons_Learned_from_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
  47. Turel, O., & Gaudioso, F. (2018). Techno-stressors, distress and strain: The roles of leadership and competitive climates. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0461-7
  48. UNESCO. (2022). Bridging the digital divide and ensuring online protection. Unesco.org. https://www.unesco.org/en/right-education/digitalization
  49. Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
  50. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
  51. Zhong, L. (2017). Indicators of digital leadership in the context of K–12 education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1001.03

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic