Understanding Public Service: A Phenomenographic Inquiry into the Lived Meanings of Civic Duty Among DepEd Administrative Workers

Orbel  Canoy,; Amabelle  Balayan,

Understanding Public Service: A Phenomenographic Inquiry into the Lived Meanings of Civic Duty Among DepEd Administrative Workers

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

This study explores the qualitatively distinct ways in which non-teaching personnel in the Department of Education (DepEd) conceptualize civic duty within their administrative roles. Using a phenomenographic research design, the study investigates how these personnel make sense of public service, interpret institutional expectations, and act upon their perceived responsibilities as government workers. Eighteen participants from various DepEd regional and division offices responded to a written interview guide in July 2025. The data were analyzed using phenomenographic methods, which revealed five distinct conceptions of civic duty: (1) following orders, (2) job commitment, (3) public support for education, (4) community engagement and collaboration, and (5) ethical and moral responsibility to the nation. These categories were structured into an outcome space reflecting a progressive shift from externally imposed compliance to internally motivated public service. The findings demonstrate that civic duty among DepEd administrative workers is not a fixed or uniform construct, but a dynamic, lived experience shaped by personal values, institutional culture, and ethical self-understanding. The study concludes that fostering deeper, values-driven engagement among non-teaching personnel requires institutional recognition of their moral agency, more reflective HR practices, and a workplace culture that affirms their contribution to nation-building. Recommendations include developing values-based training, reframing administrative work as civic engagement, and supporting ethical public service within the DepEd bureaucracy.

References:

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (Eds.). (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering (2^nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0013251
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. A. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 62–82). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Free Press.