Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Classroom Practices in Teaching Science
Yodel D. Dizon
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
The study aimed to determine the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and
classroom practices among elementary schools in Zone II, Division of
Zambales. A descriptive research design was employed using a survey questionnaire as the primary instrument for data collection. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze and interpret
the data. Findings revealed that the majority of the teacher-respondents were female, in middle adulthood, with MAED units, holding the
position of Teacher I, and relatively new in the service. The respondents strongly agreed on both teacher-centered and student-centered
pedagogical beliefs. Results further showed that there was no significant difference in teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and classroom practices in teaching science when grouped according to profile variables. However, a significant relationship was found between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their classroom practices, indicating a
high correlation between the two. The effective use of strategies to
reduce teachers’ and students’ resistance in science teaching requires purposeful developmental planning and the integration of active learning strategies. Moreover, the integration of technology in
classroom instruction has the potential to promote more studentcentered and constructivist beliefs among teachers. The study recommends that teachers employ differentiated activities and teaching
strategies based on students’ learning needs and conduct action research to further improve the teaching and learning process. Future
researchers are encouraged to conduct broader and more in-depth
studies to validate the findings.
References:
- Aghazo, A., & NaggarGaad, E. (2004). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion: A comparative study. Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(4), 287–305.
- Aloka, P. J. O., & Bojuwoye, O. (2013). Decision making and risk behaviour among early versus experienced teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1117–1126.
- Alquarini, E. (2012). Gender and inclusive edu-cation attitudes among teachers. Interna-tional Journal of Educational Research, 56, 45–53.
- Amiryousefi, M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.10
- Biyani, P. (2013). Teacher burnout across ages and experience levels. International Jour-nal of Educational Management, 27(8), 834–850.
- Bongco, R. A., & Abenes, S. (2019). Gender dy-namics in Philippine basic education: Caregiving roles and professional pat-terns. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(1), 12–30.
- Bryan, L. A. (2012). Research on science teacher beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education(pp. 477–495). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_32
- Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing developmen-tal psychology(2nd ed.). Routledge.Cristillo, L. (2010). Teacher-centered peda-gogy: Historical roots and contemporary critique. Journal of Educational Thought, 44(2), 123–142.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Deng, F. (2014). Exploring teachers’ pedagogi-cal beliefs and their impact on teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Educa-tion, 39, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002
- Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee, M.-H. (2014). The relationships among teach-ers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs, and teaching practices. Educational Psy-chology, 34(6), 771–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.806394
- Department of Education. (2007). DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2007: Revised guidelines on ap-pointment and promotion of teaching, re-lated teaching, and non-teaching positions.
- Department of Education. (2020). Basic educa-tion curriculum guide.Ding, A.-C. E. (2019). Teachers’ pedagogical be-liefs and instructional practices. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n2p1
- Ding, A.-C. E., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Left-wich, A. (2019). Teacher beliefs and in-structional decision-making. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9620-y
- Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Teacher pedagogical be-liefs and classroom technology use. Com-puters & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.014
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, be-havioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav-ior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146YD Dizon,2026 /Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Classroom Practices in Teaching ScienceIJMABER998Volume 7| Number 2| February| 2026
- Haney, R., Lumpe, A., & Czerniak, C. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: Itera-tive change in beliefs and practices. Jour-nal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 147–165.
- Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2007). Teacher train-ing, experience, and effectiveness: Impli-cations for policy. American Economic Re-view, 97(2), 281–286.
- Jeanna, M. (2009). Teacher beliefs and class-room practices: Foundations for instruc-tional decisions. Journal of Teacher Educa-tion, 60(4), 427–441.
- Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques(2nd rev. ed.). New Age International Publishers.Ladd, H. F. (2008). Teacher effectiveness and career longevity. Education Economics Re-view, 15(1), 1–28.
- Lamar, B. (2005). Quantitative research design and methods. Academic Press.Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2016). Gender and primary ed-ucation: Cultural interpretations of care-giving and teaching. International Review of Education, 62(5), 643–661.
- Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology inte-gration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.001
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Education at a glance 2008: OECD indicators. OECD Pub-lishing.
- Oech, R. (2007). Creativity and the right brain: Understanding creative teaching and learning. Wiley.
- Pārresoru koordinācijas centrs. (2012). Na-tional development plan of Latvia 2014–2020. Cross-Sectoral Coordination Centre.Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2013). Educa-tion for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
- Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for busi-ness: A skill-building approach(4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Sommers, C. H. (2008). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. Simon & Schuster.
- Suryabarata, T. (2003). Metodologi penelitian. Rajawali Press.Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ pedagogical be-liefs and technology use in education. Ed-ucational Technology Research and Devel-opment, 64(4), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9452-5
- Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ot-tenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understand-ing the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. Computers & Education, 94, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
- Tūna, A., Brante, G., & Helmane, I. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs and pedagogical prac-tices in inclusive education. Procedia –So-cial and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1215
- Wood, C. (2012). Gender roles in education and administration: Trends and challenges. Educational Leadership Journal, 69(2), 18–24.
- Wylie, C. (2000). Teacher induction and early career patterns. In K. Leithwood & P. Hal-linger (Eds.), Second international hand-book of educational leadership and admin-istration(pp. 827–848). Springer.
- Zafer, S., & Aslihan, G. (2012). Age and teaching effectiveness: Classroom management and pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Educa-tion, 63(3), 195–206