Effectiveness of Reading Enhancement Achieving Progress (REAP) on Learners’ Reading Comprehension
Gemma E. Amarillo
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
All 19 respondents were female teachers, mostly aged 31–40 (9), with 11 married and
8 single. Eighteen were pursuing a Master’s degree, and one was a BSEEd graduate.
In terms of teaching experience, eight had more than six years, while seven had one to
three years. Seventeen received a “Very Satisfactory” rating. Most had attended
trainings at the division (15) and district (10) levels, with fewer participating at the
national (7) and regional (4) levels. In terms of the effectiveness of the Reading
Enhancement Achieving Progress (REAP) program, it was rated as “Much Effective”
in enhancing word recognition and decoding, improving fluency and accuracy, and
developing reading comprehension, with a grand mean of 3.94. Regarding learners'
reading performance based on the Comprehensive Reading and Language
Assessment (CRLA), most were at the proficient (75) and basic (59) levels, while some
were excellent (33), limited (22), or needed improvement (11). A significant
relationship was found between the effectiveness of REAP and learners’ reading
performance, with a chi-square value of 9.87 and a p-value of 0.029, indicating that
REAP had a meaningful impact. In terms of issues and concerns, teachers highlighted
challenges such as accurately assessing progress (15), addressing diverse learning
needs (13), student engagement and motivation (11 each), sustainability and parental
support (9 each), time constraints (7), and limited resources (5).
References:
- Anderson, P., Smith, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021, April 15). The importance of decoding and comprehension in primary learners' reading development. Reading Education Journal. Retrieved from https://www.readingedjournal.com
- Choi, K., & Lee, Y. (2022, May 5). Applying Vygotsky’s ZPD in the context of reading comprehension interventions: A case study . Journal of Educational Development. Retrieved from https://www.journalofedu.com
- Harris, M., & Ramalingam, A. (2023, January 10). Scaffolding reading comprehension through guided intervention programs. International Journal of Educational Research. Retrieved from https://www.ijerjournal.com
- Johnson, T., & Williams, J. (2021). Enhancing reading comprehension through interactive approaches in primary education. Literacy Learning Journal. Retrieved from https://www.literacylearningjournal.com
- Li, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). The interactive nature of reading comprehension: A study on effective reading programs in primary education. Educational Research Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.edu-researchquarterly.com
- Miller, R., Lee, S., & Hughes, P. (2023, March 2). Integrating background knowledge with reading comprehension strategies in young learners. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.jceps.org
- Smith, J., Turner, G., & Brown, L. (2022, June 17). Cognitive interactions in the process of reading comprehension: The role of vocabulary and background knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research. Retrieved from https://www.journalofliteracyresearch.com
- Sullivan, C., & Huang, M. (2020, December 5). Decoding and comprehension in early reading programs: Evidence and best practices. Early Childhood Reading Education. Retrieved from https://www.earlychildhoodreadingedu.com
- Taylor, A., Hernandez, E., & Wong, J. (2020, February 8). Fostering active engagement in reading comprehension: The role of interactive strategies in primary education. Reading Research International. Retrieved from https://www.readingresearchintl.com
- Walker, D., & Johnson, L. (2023, June 24). Addressing decoding difficulties in primary learners to improve comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology . Retrieved from https://www .jeducpsychology .com
ISSN 3082-4400 (Online)
ISSN 3082-5733 (Print)