HomeJPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journalvol. 61 no. 3 (2025)

Infusion, Diffusion, And Acculturation On Instructional Training: Lived Experiences Of Social Studies Teachers

Lea P. Monloy | Nancy B. Espacio

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

Teaching Social Studies is more than just delivering lessons, it’s about shaping perspectives, and encouraging critical thinking. Hence, this exploration was triggered to hear directly from Social Studies teachers about their reallife experiences with instructional training. The study explores how professional training impacts teaching practices. Using a qualitative approach, the research delves into the lived experiences of social studies teachers of Tacurong City Division secondary schools, who have integrated new instructional methods into their classrooms. Participants were selected through purposive sampling and shared insights through interviews. The study highlights three key processes: infusion, where teachers integrate new strategies like technology and differentiated instruction into their curriculum to enhance student engagement; diffusion, which involves sharing these practices among colleagues to foster collaboration and peer mentoring. Acculturation focuses on adapting teaching methods to address students’ cultural and emotional needs, promoting inclusivity and sensitivity. Results indicate that while instructional training significantly enhances teaching strategies, challenges like technological limitations, large class sizes, and financial constraints hinder full implementation. Despite these barriers, the study underscores the transformative potential of instructional training in creating inclusive, dynamic learning environments. Teachers become more adaptable and student-centered, improving both pedagogical effectiveness and student outcomes. Recommendations call for systemic support to address challenges and maximize benefits of instructional training.



References:

  1. Ajayi, T., Amosun, P. A., & Ige, O. A. (2020). Impact of Online Resources on Pre-service Teachers' Academic Performance in Social Studies Concepts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5716-5721.
  2. Akareem, H.S., (2016). Determinants of education quality: What makes students‟ perception different? Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1): 52-67.
  3. Alazam, A. O., Bakar, A. R., Hamzah, R., & Asmiran, S. (2013). Teachers’ ICT skills and ICT integration in the classroom: The case of vocational and technical teachers in Malaysia. Creative Education, 3(08), 70.
  4. Berray, M. (2019). A Critical Literary Review of the Melting Pot and Salad Bowl Assimilation and Integration Theories. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 6, 142–51.
  5. Brown, T. T. (2018). Teacher qualification characteristics and secondary school students’ mathematics achievement: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 2(4), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v2n4p271
  6. Caldis, S., (2017). Teaching out of field: Teachers having to know what they do not know. Geography Bulletin, 49(1): 13-17.
  7. Corpuz, B., Salandanan, G. & RIGOR, D. (2006).Principles of teaching 2.Quezon City; Lorimar Publishing Inc.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2013). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  9. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2023). Critical race theory: An introduction (Vol. 87). NyU press.
  10. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines (2017). DepEd Order No 42: National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved                                                                                                                                        from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf
  11. Estrelloso, C., A. Cuyno, J. Gimoros and R.B. Inocian, (2018). Complementation of the labada teaching model for a gender sensitized society. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(1): 23-34.Available at: 10.21474/IJAR01/8292.
  12. Hobbs, L. and G. Törner, (2014). Taking on international perspective on "out-offield" teaching. Proceedings and Agenda for Research and Action from the 1stTeaching AcrossSpecializations (TAS) Collective Symposium. TAS Collective. Available from https://www.uni-due.de/TAS 
  13. Ludwig, D. and El-Hani, Ch. (2020). Philosophy of ethnobiology: understanding knowledge integration and its limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology 40(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3
  14. Makarova, E., Gilde, J. and Birman, D. (2019): Teachers as risk and resource factors in minority students’ school adjustment: an integrative review of qualitative research on acculturation.                                      Intercultural               Education,               30(5),               448-477.https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1586212
  15. Manthalu, C. H. and Waghid, Y. (2019). Decoloniality as a viable response to educational transformation in Africa. Education for Decoloniality and Decolonization in Africa. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15689-3
  16. Pascual, M. E., & Robles, A. D. (2024). Digital pedagogy practices and academic performance                                 of            senior            high            school            students.            ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED654660.pdf
  17. Porsch, R. and H. Wendt, (2015). Social and science education by primary school teachers who majored in Biology versus a different subject. ECER Conference.
  18. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. Salloumk, S., Siry, Ch. and Espinet, M. (2020). Examining the complexities of science education in multilingual contexts: highlighting international perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 42, 14, 2285-2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1831644
  19. Salloumk, S., Siry, Ch. and Espinet, M. (2020). Examining the complexities of science education in multilingual contexts: highlighting international perspectives. International Journal of                        Science   Education,       42,                        14,            2285-2289.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1831644
  20. Swaidan, Z. (2018). Acculturation strategies of Asian-Americans. Competition Forum, 16(2), 39–45.
  21. Taddeo, R., Simboli, A., Morgante, A., & Erkman, S. (2017). The development of industrial symbiosis in existing contexts. Experiences from three Italian clusters. Ecological Economics, 139, 55-67.
  22. Tejada, C.J., L.S. Juarez, M.M. Molbog and R.B. Inocian, 2018. Upland farming practices basis for a culturally-based ugmad teaching model. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(12): 1066-1074.Available at: 10.21474/IJAR01/8236.
  23. Topaz, A. (2017). Enhancing Student Engagement through Interactive Learning Strategies. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023, pp. 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jerp.2023.01502.
  24. Tovar-Gálvez, J. C. (2021). The epistemological bridge as a framework to guide teachers to design culturally inclusive practices. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 760-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1883203
  25. Wall, A., & Leckie, A. (2017). Curriculum integration: an overview. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 22(1), 36-40. 
  26. Williams, G. H. (2020). An investigation of instructional training experiences among social studies teachers. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 17(1), 56-67.