Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 4 no. 7 (2026)

Lived Experiences of Graduate Students in Understanding Core Mathematics Subjects Through Online Modality

Ella Rose Marie Morala | Exenizer Arcon | Edna Cenita | Andrew Felix Iv Cunanan | Jayson P. Pucot

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the lived experiences of graduate mathematics students in understanding core mathematics subjects through online modality. Guided by a qualitative phenomenological design, the research captured the challenges, coping strategies, and insights of second-year graduate students enrolled in advanced courses such as Set Theory, Number Theory, Abstract Algebra, Modern Algebra, and Advanced Geometry. A purposive sample of participants from selected higher education institutions participated in in-depth interviews, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed two major dimensions of online learning experiences: negative and positive. Students encountered significant challenges, including unstable internet connectivity, limited interaction with instructors and peers, difficulty in understanding abstract and complex mathematical concepts, and learning fatigue. These challenges contributed to cognitive overload, decreased motivation, and emotional frustration. Despite these difficulties, students demonstrated adaptive coping mechanisms such as self-discipline, independent learning, resilience, and persistence. Their emotional experiences shifted between discouragement and fulfillment as they navigated and overcame learning obstacles. The findings contribute to the existing literature on constructivism, self-regulated learning, and online collaborative learning by contextualizing these frameworks within the domain of advanced mathematics education in an online learning environment



References:

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://tinyurl.com/ymt8pwph
  2. Bushe, T., & Maluleke, S. (2023). Digital transformation in mathematics education: Strategic responses to e-learning challenges. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 7(5), 450–456. https://tinyurl.com/5xn26u5c
  3. Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://tinyurl.com/mwmm347n
  4. Christou, P. (2023). How to use thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2023.0006
  5. Dursun, B. (2023). A qualitative research technique: Interview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 7(14), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1245193
  6. Enworo, O.C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
  7. Fabito, B., Trillanes, A., & Sarmiento, J. (2021). Barriers and challenges of computing students in an online learning environment: Insights from one private university in the Philippines. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.51
  8. Kakar, Z.U.H., Akhter, S., & Ali, A. (2023). Criteria for assessing and ensuring the trustworthiness in qualitative research. International Journal of Business Reflections, 4(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.56249/ijbr.03.01.44
  9. Mamolo, L. (2022). Online learning and students’ mathematics motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety in the new normal. Education Research International, 2022, Article 9439634. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9439634
  10. Megheirkouni, M., & Moir, J. (2023). Simple but effective criteria: Rethinking excellent qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 28(3), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5845
  11. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  12. Pokhrel, M. (2023). Factors associated with the problems in teaching mathematics through online mode: A context of Nepal. Pythagoras, 44(1), Article a568. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i3.3097
  13. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  14. Salubayba, T. M. (2021). Pandemic online learning experiences of graduate students in education: Motivations, hurdles, and coping strategies. International Journal of Global Community, 4(3), 199–216.
  15. Stratton, S. (2024). Purposeful sampling: Advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281
  16. Zhang, L., Li, Q., Duffy, P., Zhang, Z., Xu, J., & Cai, J. (2024). Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on graduate learning experiences in higher education: Insights and recommendations. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241239889

 

 


Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic