Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Stories from the Classroom: Exploring Teachers’ Firsthand Experiences in Handling Bullying

Lenie Norab | Josephine B. Baguio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

1 Graduate School, Rizal Memorial Colleges, Inc., Davao, Philippines * Correspondence: josephinebbaguio@ou tlook.com Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 This study examined the experiences of public elementary school teachers in handling bullying incidents in their classrooms in Tibungco District, Division of Davao City. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, ten teachers participated in in-depth interviews, and the data were analyzed through thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns across their narratives. The findings revealed three major challenges: student behavioral issues, limited support and resources, and emotional and professional stress. Teachers addressed these challenges through proactive classroom management, collaboration and support-seeking, and emotional regulation and self- care. The study also identified three professional insights gained from experience: the importance of early intervention, the value of empathy and understanding, and the role of continuous professional development. These findings highlight the complexity of classroom bullying management and underscore the need for stronger school support systems, clearer anti-bullying protocols, and sustained teacher development to promote safe, inclusive, and supportive learning environments.



References:

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
  3. Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
  4. Burger, C., Strohmeier, D., & Kollerová, L. (2022). Teachers can make a difference in bullying: Effects of teacher interventions on students’ adoption of bully, victim, bully-victim, or defender roles across time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(12), 2312–2327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01674-6
  5. Chiu, H., & Vargo, E. J. (2022). Bullying and other risk factors related to adolescent suicidal behaviours in the Philippines: A look into the 2011 GSHS Survey. BMC Psychiatry, 22, 445. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04085-w
  6. Divecha, D., & Brackett, M. (2020). Rethinking school-based bullying prevention through the lens of social and emotional learning: A bioecological perspective. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00019-5
  7. Dreer, B. (2023). On the outcomes of teacher wellbeing: A systematic review of research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1205179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205179
  8. Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2021). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), e1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1143
  9. Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10627: Anti-Bullying Act of 2013. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/09/12/republic-act-no-10627/
  10. UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483
  11. van Aalst, D. A. E., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2024). A systematic review on primary school teachers’ characteristics and behaviors in identifying, preventing, and reducing bullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 6, 353–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-022-00145-7

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic