Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Teaching Learning Disabilities Without Support: Experiences of SPED Trained Teachers in Remote Communities

Mirafe Calig-onan | Charlyn Lanaban | Danielle Faye Angela Manco | Edward Ryan Gulam | Rheamarie Jo V Cerbo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

1 Graduate School, Holy Cross of Davao College, Davao, Philippines * Correspondence: mirafe.calig- onan@hcdc.edu.ph Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 Teaching learners with learning disabilities in remote schools without formal support strains SPED-trained teachers. With this, we explored the challenges, coping mechanisms, and insights gained by SPED-trained teachers assigned in remote communities. We used single case study design, selected SPED-trained teachers assigned in remote public schools in Caraga, Davao Oriental as our participants, and examined their classroom realities as our bounded case. Using Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as our lens, we found that teachers in remote schools faced not just instructional demands for learning disabilities, but resource scarcity, specialist support gaps, isolation, and system barriers as well; however, this burden was managed not just through available supports and practical strategies but through renewed appraisal of meaning, limits, and progress. Coping was not relied on materials and instructional adjustment alone but by peer support, prayer, and acceptance of personal limits. This realization drove us to consider further study on the role of coping between stressors and teacher well-being as an important future research task.



References:

  1. Aas, H. K., Uthus, M., & Løhre, A. (2024). Inclusive education for students with challenging behaviour: Development of teachers’ beliefs and ideas for adaptations through lesson study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 39(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2191107
  2. Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
  3. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171
  4. Allam, F. C., & Martin, M. M. (2021). Issues and challenges in special education: A qualitative analysis from teacher’s perspective. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol10.1.4.2021
  5. Aulén, A. M., Pakarinen, E., Feldt, T., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2021). Teacher coping profiles in relation to teacher well-being: A mixed-method approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103323
  6. Cena, E., Brooks, J., Day, W., Goodman, S., Rousaki, A., Ruby-Granger, V., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2024). Quality criteria: General and specific guidelines for qualitative approaches in psychology research: A concise guide for novice researchers and reviewers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241282843
  7. Cheng, S. N., & Toran, H. (2022). Knowledge, practice and challenges of special education teachers in managing the behaviour of students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i3/14232
  8. Donath, J. L., Lüke, T., Tran, U. S., & Götz, T. (2025). The transfer of teacher training to inclusive classroom practice: A meta-analytic SEM approach. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10081-9
  9. Einav, M., Confino, D., Geva, N., & Margalit, M. (2024). Teachers’ burnout: The role of social support, gratitude, hope, entitlement and loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 9(2), 827–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-024-00154-5
  10. Emeljanovas, A., Sabaliauskas, S., Mežienė, B., & Istomina, N. (2023). The relationships between teachers’ emotional health and stress coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1276431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276431
  11. Frearson, A., & Duncan, M. (2024). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of teachers’ lived experiences of working with traumatised children in the classroom. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 17, 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00614-9
  12. Horn, A. L., Floyd, K. K., Douglas, K. H., Karadimou, O., Bobzien, J. L., & Layden, S. J. (2024). What do rural special education teachers say? Examining the reported needs and recommendations for retention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705241254863
  13. Kelly, N. J., Hallam, J., & Bignell, S. (2023). Using interpretative phenomenological analysis to gain a qualitative understanding of presence in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 27, 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00719-2
  14. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company. https://books.google.com/books?id=i-ySQQuUpr8C
  15. Maratos, F. A., Parente, F., Sahota, T. J., & Murphy, J. (2024). Wellbeing and burnout in schoolteachers: The psychophysiological case for self-compassion. Current Psychology, 43, 37055–37069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07060-8
  16. McGrew, J., Ruble, L., Cormier, C. J., & Dueber, D. (2023). Special educators’ mental health and burnout: A comparison of general and teacher-specific risk factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104209
  17. Nizza, I. E., Farr, J., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): Four markers of high quality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1854404
  18. Pocaan, J. M. (2022). Exploring teaching strategies and challenges towards a holistic context-based special education teaching strategies program. The Normal Lights, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.56278/TNL.V16I1.1975
  19. Robinson, C., & Williams, H. (2024). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Learnings from employing IPA as a qualitative methodology in educational research. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 939–952. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6487
  20. Sebastian, J., Aguayo, D., Yang, W., Reinke, W. M., & Herman, K. C. (2024). Profiles of principal stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates. Journal of School Psychology, 107, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101387
  21. Sepadi, M. D. (2025). Teachers’ understanding of implementing inclusion in mainstream classrooms in rural areas. Education Sciences, 15(7), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070889
  22. Tenerife, J. J. L., Peteros, E. D., Zaragoza, I. D., de Vera, J. V., Pinili, L. C., & Fulgencio, M. D. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions on their competence and the benefits of inclusive education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2605–2621. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7784
  23. Wang, X., Yang, L., Chen, K., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Understanding teacher emotional exhaustion: Exploring the role of teaching motivation, perceived autonomy, and teacher-student relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1342598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1342598
  24. Willis, R. K., & Harvey, S. (2025). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in applied linguistics research: A field-specific guide. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100279

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic