Integration of Technology in Teaching Araling Panlipunan and Academic Performance among Students
Rhodabelle Pallin | Wenie L. Nahial | Elizabeth Remigoso
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
1 Mambajao National High School, Camiguin, Philippines 2 Camiguin Polytechnic State College, Camiguin, Philippines * winenahial@gmail. com Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 This study aimed to investigate the extent of technology integration in teaching Araling Panlipunan and its association with the academic performance of Junior High School students in the Division of Camiguin during the second quarter of school year 2025-2026. A descriptive- correlational research design was utilized with 42 teachers and 1,353 students. Observance of research protocols and the use of appropriate statistical tools were employed at all times. The findings revealed that teachers integrate technology to a high extent (M=3.58) and students achieve a very satisfactory academic level (M=87.25). However, there was no significant link between the integration of technology and the grades of the students (r_s= 0.266,p > 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis test results indicated that the highest educational attainment was a significant factor in the integration of technology (p=0.036). But the respondents' utilization of technology did not vary when grouped by age, tenure of service, and specialization. Despite high teacher confidence, systemic barriers like unstable internet connectivity (M=2.55) and limited technical training continues to exist. These results suggest that while the digital transition is underway, the focus must shift from basic tool availability toward pedagogy-driven instruction to meaningfully enhance student learning outcomes.
References:
- Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs, and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
- Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emissions: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 11654–11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
- Aesaert, K., Van Nijlen, D., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., Devlieger, I., & van Braak, J. (2015). The contribution of pupil, classroom, and school-level characteristics to primary school pupils’ ICT competences: A performance-based approach. Computers & Education, 87, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.014
- Ahmed, V., & Opoku, A. (2022). Technology-supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 365–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10706-w
- Alruthaya, A. S. M., Khan, S., Saini, A., & Muthaly, S. (2025). Unveiling academic performance through digital technology engagement: UTAUT2 insights from post-pandemic Saudi undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 20, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100824
- Ancho, I. V., & Arrieta, G. S. (2021). Filipino teacher professional development in the new normal. Education and Self Development, 16(3), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.3.04
- Asio, J. M. R., & Jimenez, E. C. (2020). Effect of remediation activities on Grade 5 pupils’ academic performance in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). Pedagogical Research, 5(4), Article em0075. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8464
- Bhat, R. A. (2023). The impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes: A comparative study. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology, 2(9), 592–596. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4036/43b81f84ba462e64f61be9227495eb2d352b.pdf
- Bordoh, A., Eshun, I., Ibrahim, A. W., Bassaw, T. K., Baah, A., & Yeboah, J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of teachers and their formative assessment practices in social studies lessons. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.31586/ujssh.2022.459
- Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015/
- Department of Education. (2023). Guidelines on the implementation of the DepEd Computerization Program (DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_016.pdf
- Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105224.pdf
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
- Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st-century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 5–10. https://ijsrmst.com/index.php/ijsrmst/article/download/199/22
- König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
- Macario, R. P., Tabian, J., & Paguigan, J. (2026). Impact of digital learning platforms on senior high school students’ engagement in the Philippines. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.67161
- Mayantao, R., & Tantiado, R. C. (2024). Teachers’ utilization of digital tools and confidence in technology. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(5), 1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i05-16
- Mirasol, J. M., Necosia, J. V. B., Bicar, B. B., & Garcia, H. P. (2021). Statutory policy analysis on access to Philippine quality basic education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100093
- Msafiri, M. M., Kangwa, D., & Cai, L. (2023). A systematic literature review of ICT integration in secondary education: What works, what does not, and what next? Discover Education, 2, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00070-x
- Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of Education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664
- Nurhikmah, H., Ramli, A. M., Sujarwo, Bena, B. A., Arwadi, F., Syawaluddin, A., & Malik, I. D. (2024). Teachers’ readiness in online learning: Digital literacy, pedagogical competence, and management support. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(8), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.8.3358
- Samane-Cutipa, V. A., Quispe-Quispe, A. M., Talavera-Mendoza, F., & Limaymanta, C. H. (2022). Digital gaps influencing the online learning of rural students in secondary education: A systematic review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7), 685–690. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.7.1671
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
- Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
- Tiwari, K. R., & Magre, S. (2025). Trends and gaps in digital competency training for teachers: A systematic review of existing literature. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 26(S2), 1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.5144
- Viona, E., Danim, S., Medriati, R., Kristiawan, M., Susanto, E., Oktaria, S. D., & Macariola, J. S. (2025). Systematic literature review: Digital literacy in classroom teaching. International Journal of Learning Reformation in Elementary Education, 4(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v4i03.1217
- Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
- Wang, L., & Yu, J. (2024). Research on the reform of English precision teaching in colleges and universities facilitated by artificial intelligence technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0627
- Zaw, W. M., & Hlaing, S. S. (2024). Bridging the educational gap: The role of digital learning platforms in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v1i1.122
- Zamora, J. T., & Zamora, J. J. M. (2022). 21st-century teaching skills and teaching standards competence level of teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.12
- Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: Trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1562391. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391
ISSN 3116-3017 (Online)
ISSN 3116-3009 (Print)