Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Pansariling Kakayahan ng mga Guro sa Filipino sa Pagsulat ng Aksyon Pananaliksik

Diomedes Beñas | Glenmar Biscarra

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

(English) This study determined the self-efficacy of DepEd Filipino language teachers in writing action research and explored their attitudes toward research as well as the challenges they face in the research writing process. Utilizing a multimethod approach, quantitative data were cokakallected through a survey questionnaire to describe teachers' levels of self-efficacy and attitudes, while qualitative data from interviews provided insights into the specific challenges encountered. Data analysis included mean, bivariate correlation analysis computations and thematic analysis. Results indicated that teachers generally rated their self-efficacy in writing action research as very good, although confidence in formulating research questions and applying action research methods was rated as good. The participants strongly agreed that engaging in research is valuable and beneficial to their professional development. Despite recognizing its importance, many teachers agreed that writing action research is challenging and can induce anxiety. Overall, there is a significant relationship between the self-efficacy of DepEd Filipino teachers in writing action research and their attitude toward research. The challenges identified included time constraints, heavy workload, limited experience and knowledge, difficulties in the research process, and resource limitations. The Department of Education should provide targeted professional development, improve access to research resources, and offer technical support to enhance teachers' research skills and engagement.



References:

  1. Abrenica, J. T., & Cascolan, H. M. S. (2022). Impact of action research in education: Experiences and challenges faced by teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 5(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5201
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000
  3. Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
  4. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2697821
  6. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
  7. Khanshan, S. K., & Yousefi, M. H. (2020). The relationship between self-efficacy and instructional practice of in-service soft disciplines, hard disciplines and EFL teachers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-0080-8
  8. Kula, S. S. (2022). The predictive relationship between pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy belief, attitudes towards the teaching profession and teaching motivation. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1068573
  9. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2408158
  10. Morales, M. P. E. (2016). Participatory action research (PAR) cum action research (AR) in teacher professional development: A literature review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 156–165. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105165.pdf
  11. Natividad, A. M., Mangulabnan, J., & Canlas, J. R. (2019). Self-efficacy, anxiety level, and research attitude of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.11.1.1
  12. Saro, J. M., & Taray, J. (2024). Teachers as researchers: Practices, perspectives, problems, and a plan of action (4Ps) for public school teachers in writing action research. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(3), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v3i3.3344
  13. Senler, B. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of attitude, anxiety and locus of control. Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116629807
  14. Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2623102
  15. Tekin, O. (2023). The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy in predicting teachers’ research attitudes. Teacher Development, 27(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2201579
  16. Tingabngab, M. F. V., & Binayao, B. S. (2023). Challenges faced by public elementary school teachers in conducting action research. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 8(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13
  17. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  18. Ulla, M. B. (2018). In-service teachers’ training: The case of university teachers in Yangon, Myanmar. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n1.4
  19. Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K. I. B., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teachers as researchers: Teachers’ perceptions, motivations, and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.4
  20. Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic