Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Critical Thinking Skills of Education Students in a State University: Insights and Implications for Curriculum Development

Carlito Asuncion | Olive Lorenzo | Jean Aguillon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

1 President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Zambales, Philippines * hadrienmathis@ gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 This study assessed the critical thinking skills of education students in a state university and examined how the findings may inform curriculum development in teacher education. Framed by Bloom's revised taxonomy and the national emphasis on 21st-century competencies, the study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design in which survey results were interpreted alongside students' open-ended descriptions of instructional strategies. Respondents were predominantly aged 20-22 years (54.10%), female (77.60%), mostly in the third year (26.50%), and enrolled in BEEd (34.70%), BSEd English (32.70%), or BSEd Social Studies (32.70%). Quantitative results showed satisfactory critical thinking across creating (WM = 3.18, SD = 0.574), evaluating (WM = 3.27, SD = 0.531), and analyzing (WM = 3.18, SD = 0.745), with evaluating emerging as the strongest domain. No significant differences were found across gender and year level in the three domains. Age showed a significant difference only in creating (F = 3.356, p = 0.037), while specialization showed significant differences in creating (F = 13.519, p = 0.000) and analyzing (F = 8.729, p = 0.000). Qualitative findings showed that faculty commonly used questioning, problem-solving tasks, gamified activities, collaboration, authentic assessment, inquiry tasks, projects, discussion, and feedback. These strategies help explain students' stronger evaluative confidence, while the comparatively modest results in creating and analyzing suggest that creativity and analytical depth require more deliberate, discipline- Critical Thinking Skills of Education Students, IJTMS, 2 (2), 703-715, 2026 704 specific scaffolding. The study recommends curriculum interventions that intentionally strengthen the creation and analysis of content through specialization-based projects, inquiry tasks, authentic assessments, reflective feedback, and structured opportunities to engage with multiple perspectives.



References:

  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/18824
  3. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Commission on Higher Education. (2017a). Policies, standards and guidelines for Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) (CHED Memorandum Order No. 74, s. 2017). https://legacy.ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CMO-No.-74-s.-2017.pdf
  6. Commission on Higher Education. (2017b). Policies, standards and guidelines for Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) (CHED Memorandum Order No. 75, s. 2017). https://legacy.ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CMO-No.-75-s.-2017.pdf
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
  8. Dupri, D., Nazirun, N., & Candra, O. (2021). Creative thinking learning of physical education: Can be enhanced using discovery learning model? Journal Sport Area, 6(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5690
  9. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244_Critical_Thinking_What_It_Is_and_Why_It_Counts
  10. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
  11. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  12. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
  13. Kobylarek, A., Błaszczyński, K., Ślósarz, L., & Madej, M. (2022). Critical Thinking Questionnaire (CThQ): Construction and application of critical thinking test tool. Andragogy: Adult Education and Social Marketing, 2(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15503/andr2022.1
  14. Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & von Korflesch, H. F. O. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
  17. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
  18. Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7), Article 155. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic